|
|
Topic started on 30-9-2008 @ 04:42 PM by Jim Marrs
|
Howdy All,
It is far easier for me to see a new Thread with a new question, than to look through all the older posts to find new questions. I would prefer you
just start a new Theme if you have further questions on an older theme if at all possible. I have missed a few questions thinking I had finished
answering the thought. Thank you all for your curiosity and questions. Each one of us is important in bring out into the open the secrets of
corporate elites.
Jim Marrs
[edit on 10/1/2008 by Jim Marrs]
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more The View From Marrs topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 20-10-2008 @ 01:09 AM by ipsedixit
|
Just a suggestion for the Mods.
Maybe this thread should be parked permanently at the top of the View from Marrs thread list. Apologies if it was already on the "to do" list.
Don't mean to butt in or act like a smarty pants.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-11-2008 @ 12:10 PM by ipsedixit
|

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall.
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
Bumpty, bumpty, bumpty, bumpty
Put Humpty back on the wall.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 04:01 AM by NovusOrdoMundi
|
reply to post by Jim Marrs
Hello Mr. Marrs,
This isn't really the typical question you get (at least I don't think it is), but: What are your views on Noam Chomsky?
I recently began reading his book Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance. This is my first time reading any thing of his,
and to this point, he seems well read on the subjects thus far written about in the book.
Having said that, I thought I would see whether or not you believe him to be a credible source of information?
[edit on 1/2/09 by NovusOrdoMundi]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 04:38 AM by dunwichwitch
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-1-2009 @ 11:56 AM by Jim Marrs
|
Howdy NovusOrdoMundi,
Seeing that Mr. Chomsky claims to be a near-anarchist "libertarian Socialist," yet disdains any conspiratorial aspects to either the assassination
of President John F. Kennedy or the attacks of 9/11, indicates to me that this distinguished academic is merely the loyal opposition.
Jim Marrs
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-1-2009 @ 12:44 PM by NovusOrdoMundi
|
reply to post by Jim Marrs
'Loyal opposition' is a great way to put it. That is the feeling I have gotten while reading his book. I, myself, have not read his views on 9-11,
but have heard from others that he doesn't question what happened.
To see him connect the dots the way he does in this particular book, and to see him question and seem as if he knows how the world truly works, only
to turn right around and not question 9-11 - that sends up red flags.
Thank you for your response
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:00 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
Hi Jim,
I'm busy reading your book Rules by Secrecy, after which I will read the Terror Conspiracy and The Rise of the Fourth Reich that I already purchased
in December.
While I'm also reading a book by Wesley Tarpley called Obama - The Postmodern Coup, and have purchased some books by Daniel Estulin, Alex Jones and
David Icke, I feel that your sources are the most reliable and do not go overboard, as you always only keep to the proven and reported facts.
How do you feel about the likes of Wesley Tarpley, Alex Jones and David Icke who in my opinion tell the truth in an exaggerating fashion that makes
people simply look down on them as fanatic conspiracy theorists?
Lastly, what is your opinion on the situation in the Taiwan Straits? I'm a European married to a Taiwanese, and live in Taiwan. It has become
apparent that President Ma is a pawn of the US, China or being pulled into two directions by both.
It is also not surprising that the ex-President is about to be removed from the political scene after he refused to follow the apparent agenda, and
preferred to call for independence instead.
It is also possible that the US is controlling Ma by holding information back that would ruin him if it were released to the media.
How do you feel on these matters? While it is easier to figure out 9/11, the Mumbai Attacks and the Middle East Crisis (thanks to Brzezinksi), the
situation in the Taiwan Straits is rather difficult to comprehend. Who really wants what out of Taiwan?
Thanks for your replies. I look forward to receiving your opinions on the situation in the Taiwan straits.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:13 AM by theindependentjournal
|
Can I ask you a question Mr. Marrs and make a point to boot?
JFK Assassination topic: Who could have performed the cover up particularly the Warren Commission Report and wouldn't this be the power that had
Kennedy killed?
Let me say up front that I have heard and believe and KNOW that Kennedy was certainly looking at ridding us of the Federal Reserve (International
Bankers) and that he ordered some Silver Certificates I believe about 4 billion worth if I aint wrong. These Silver Certificates of course were a
frontal attack on the Federal Reserve and their Fiat Currency/Note.
I hear people say Oswald did it, the CIA did it, the Mob did it, Castro did it and so on and so on. But the question I always come to is the one above
and here is what I think, tell me where I am wrong or your thoughts please sir.
The Warren Commission put out what has to be the dumbest and most ridiculous report ever by Congress ever, cmon a "Magic Bullet". But yet the
Commission and all its prestigious and up and coming political stars all signed off on this ridiculous idea of bullets turning around in mid air and
what not. So who has the power over these people or has something on them that they can use to blackmail them into the Warren Report? I can only come
up with one answer every time. I can not see Castro having any influence at all over this body, nor the Mob, nor do I believe Oswald had Magic Bullets
so this leaves the CIA and the International Bankers in my book. The CIA may have carried parts of this assassination out but I believe only on Orders
from the bankers. The Bankers in my opinion are the only ones with the power. authority, clout, whatever you want to call it to pull the whole thing
off. The CIA couldn't I don't believe have that kind of power over the Commission.
So there it is, I think when looked at in totality the only answer can be the International Bankers or Federal Reserve would have had the ability to
pull off the whole caper and no other group had the ability t pull the whole thing off. I think those Silver Certificates were Kennedy's Death
Order...
Sir, your thoughts? and Thanks for quoting me in your piece on Obama's Birth Certificate, sure it was anonymous but it was my post...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 11:32 AM by Mirthful Me
|
Please read...
Originally posted by Jim Marrs
Howdy All,
It is far easier for me to see a new Thread with a new question, than to look through all the older posts to find new questions. I would prefer you
just start a new Theme if you have further questions on an older theme if at all possible. I have missed a few questions thinking I had finished
answering the thought. Thank you all for your curiosity and questions. Each one of us is important in bring out into the open the secrets of
corporate elites.
Jim Marrs
[edit on 10/1/2008 by Jim Marrs]
And to facilitate this request... Please make inquiries via a new thread...
Thread closed.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|