|
reply posted on 1-10-2008 @ 01:26 PM by testrat
|
Ah, success. Bloated raccoon.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2008 @ 04:37 PM by Ravinsomniac
|
Yummy
Bloated Racoon
..it's what's for dinner...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 02:01 PM by susieseahag
|
Either way they're gross dead decomposing animals of some sort
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 09:49 PM by ravenshadow13
|
First one looks like some sort of seal or manatee to me.
Second... maybe a raccoon (we do have huge ones here in CT) but the tail looks weird. Do raccoon tails look like that?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 10:17 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 10:33 PM by Sonya610
|
Some of those "racoon" pics look awfully canine to me. And lets remember it is not nice to make fun of the dead, or specifically the pictures of the
dead.
We will all end up dead one day and chances are none of us will be all that pretty.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 10:36 PM by Good Wolf
|
Looks like a grabiod.
Had to be said.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2008 @ 08:13 PM by Clear Thinker
|
Whats in between both locations? Well that is the Plum Island Island Animal Disease research center. I find it highly suspicious that the carcass
suddenly disappeared. Shouldn't have this animal been identified?
Something smells fishy and its not a dead carcass.
Its not at all suspiciopus the carcass "suddenly" disappeared. It could have washed out to sea again, or more likely, it was disposed of by the
sanitation department. It was probablly transported tothe local rendering plant. Think about all the dead animals there are in cities. Dogs, cats,
pigeons and the like. They are not left to decay, at least not in large cities, instead they are taken to a rendering plant. Right now that carcass
has probablly been boiled, rendered and is now being trasformed into a tube of lipstick.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 03:02 PM by TheWalkingFox
|
The additional pictures where the creature is moved are really revealing.
That is, revealing in that all the identifying characteristics of the critter are covered with sand (the forepaws) or shot at an unidentifiable angle
or distance (the teeth)
It doesn't look fake to me. But it does look like someone's trying to make it more mysterious. I'm putting my money on raccoon, going by the digits
in the initial picture, what I can make out of the teeth, and the fur in the later pictures
If there were something to scale it by and it were larger, my next guess would be some unfortunate mutt with some mastiff / bulldog type mixed in.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 03:28 PM by billybob
|
reply to post by Zepherian
please don't tell people what not to notice and what not to talk about. it makes you a media censorship supporter, and turns you into the enemy you
are trying to defeat.
would you have the entire world wide web forced into focus on the issues YOU care about most?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 15-11-2008 @ 02:31 AM by Raustin
|
reply to post by Zepherian
Why don't you start your own thread then? I see your point, but it's irritating when you try to derail someone elses thread.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2008 @ 01:39 PM by Vixxeh__X
|
Looks like a chupacabra
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 05:54 PM by justyn
|
i lived in astoria for some time and sea lions are really common there and of course being a teenager i messed with them well anyway a friend of mine
had found a dead one and being the man that he is he took the head and had it defleshed what you should know is that the top pic is infact a sea lion
sorry but that is what they look like.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 06:12 PM by justyn
|
but seriosly i have no idea what the hell the second thing is that stumps me, i think you might have something there
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:13 PM by ravenshadow13
|
Probably a seal, we have lots of them in CT
Otherwise, I would have said manatee.
Could also be a part of whale blubber.
And the second one was either like a rotten dog or raccoon or a hoax. I remember that from awhile ago on these crypto forums. It's not a new
picture.
[edit on 11/23/2008 by ravenshadow13]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:22 PM by angel of lightangelo
|
Originally posted by bvproductions
*Shrug*
I still think it's some type of seal, though. Whoever could possibly think that carcass belonged to a raccoon is brilliantly incompetent...
The second pic has been proven to be a raccoon. I cannot find the site right now but it was loaded with pics of raccoon carcasses in different states
of decay and sure enough, take some flesh off the nose and they were all identical. It was not a close match to another pic, it was photo after photo
of either known raccoon corpses or UNMISTAKABLY raccoon corpses. I thought that one had been put to rest already.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:25 PM by iesus_freak
|
reply to post by testrat
that 2nd pic looks like sometype of dinosaur. the first one looks like a walrus
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-12-2008 @ 11:44 AM by theindependentjournal
|
I am very interested in Plum Island now, very good work linking all this. I don't know what the animals are but the second pic in the OP looks like a
Gargoyle to me.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |