I have a thing about posting questions, huh?!

For mainly all you Brits. My dad and I are getting a telescope, going 50/50, but what's a good one under £100? I've been looking on Amazon and found a really good one for £102 (with P&P), apparantly the scoop on this one says you can see Mars clealy, Jupiter with its rings etc...

So, just wondered who has one and good plazes other than amazon.com, ta!

Emmy

I borrowed my Brothers telescope and being a total noob , I have to say that try to get one with as big a lens as possible for the money. My Bro's one's only got about a 2 inch lens and that cost him 350 quid coz it's motorised and it's enough to see the moon . Not really close though but you can see the craters and shadows. One night I was even able to spot another planet, not sure which one but I seem to remember is had 3 small spots / moons if I looked close enough, Venus maybe ?.( looked like a really bright close star with 3 small bright dots- quite nice actually).
Anyways it also pays to invest in some extra eyepieces for it, as they help magnifying the image as well as buying a bit ( like a sniper scope with crosshairs) that lets you 'target' the thing you want to look at, when I was trying to find the moon with the borrow TS I had to roughly point it in the right direction then look for the brighter area .
Also don't forget that the image is back to front I found that out whn I moved the scope to look at the other planet and had to realign it against the moon to start again
Like I tell other people try to buy big numbers for little cash, the bigger the lens the 'closer' the object.
Good luck in buying .
Not much help I know but there will be others with more clue on what to look for

I am not British, but I recently done a lot of research about telescopes and feel I can add. When it comes to telescopes, you really do get what you pay for. The more expensive is usually better because the larger the primary mirror, the more light you are able catch. There are numerous plans running around also on building your own...the primary mirror being the most expensive part. The other day I found a 4" Newtonian at Sams Club going for $199 (about $110 GBP). Would have been a good deal, but I am saving up for a 16" primary mirror.

Also, I do know that you can modify a cheap webcam to connect to your telescopes eyepiece very easily. I did this with the cheap-o-one I borrowed from my cousin and it was able to increase the magnification significantly.

But in all honesty, if you want to be able to see Mars and Jupiter clearly, your probably better off saving a bit more money to invest in a much larger one.

Slightly off topic but is there a telescope that can be plugged into say a laptop, so the image can be projected onto the screen?

Just my two US cents:

I was thinking about buying a telescope and did some research (reviews and all). Being a gear afficionado (I collect vintage electronic gear), I came to the conclusion that it's better to wait a year and save more money, rather than buying a cheap device. I made this mistake before in different situations. At 100 pounds, you'd be scraping the bottom of the barrel in terms of quality.

OK, thanks for the input, will try convince daddio to pay out for more, might try aim for a £200 mark!

Thanks

Heya Paul, thanks for the advice. Didn't think I had to take so much into consideration! Ah, I'm sure we'll find a good beginners one!

Thanks again, much appreciated!

I have a 675x power “Reflector” telescope made by Science Tech, and last night I was aimed at our moon. I was getting a pretty good image of it, but I notice that the smallest movement of the telescope would throw off the image, however my question is how difficult would it be for me to find a planet or a star that I can line it up so i can get an image? I’ve tryed numerus times before and still have not found anything, its just a black image. So if you have any tips or suggestions that would be much appreciated.

i know lots abuot telescopes i am nto british but have ben into astornomy since i was 10.. iam 33 now.
Those rings of saturna nd belts on jupiter, yuo wil not be able too see, unless yuor reflector telescope is at least 8 inches in diamter. Anything less than that, will jsut show saturn as a yellow blob with 2 ears kinda, and 2 belts on jupiter, not the many that biger scope woudl reveal.
and as for deep sapce stuff, even the largest telescopes on earth, will not show any color at all.... thats film.. light builds up on film over atime, along witht he object being tracked acorss the sky, on an equatoral base..thast how yuo get all those colros in deep space photos.. but iwth planets, their still clsoe enough, so yuo can see alot..
aim for 8 inches or more. Refractors, give teh clearest views, to an extent, but in refractors(long skinnyt ubes) the images are uspide down.. whcih cna be correctted, with a diagonal lens. refrators only go up to 6 inches are VERY expensive..
reflectorrs are huge, but worth the money and cheaper
Get a few eyepieces too..a 7.5 mm, a 12 mm and 24 mm do nice

I'm afraid I must take issue with what you have said:

Originally posted by ziggy1706
Those rings of saturna nd belts on jupiter, yuo wil not be able too see, unless yuor reflector telescope is at least 8 inches in diamter. Anything less than that, will jsut show saturn as a yellow blob with 2 ears kinda, and 2 belts on jupiter, not the many that biger scope woudl reveal.

I have seen the rings of Saturn and the belts of Jupiter very clearly with a 4.5 inch reflector, moreover these features are certainly visible in a 3 inch refractor!

Originally posted by ziggy1706
aim for 8 inches or more. Refractors, give teh clearest views, to an extent, but in refractors(long skinnyt ubes) the images are uspide down.. whcih cna be correctted, with a diagonal lens.

For people starting out 4-6 inch reflector will give spledid views of many objects. Moreover it is not just a refractor which gives an upside down image, reflectors do to! If you use a star diagonal then you also get a mirror image swap as well (i.e. following becomes proceeding etc).

[edit on 20-10-2008 by timelike]

I have a celestron starhopper 6" on a dobsonian mount. The starhopper series has been discontinued but Orion telescopes has an equivalent. Its the XCT series I think. One thing to bear in mind when looking at a scope: its not the power that gives you good views, its the light gathering.

When you do finally buy a scope, take the time to learn it inside and out before you take it out in the field. Learn how to collimate it (align the lenses and mirrors). This will make a HUGE difference in what you can see. If you don't know how to use it, all the money in the world wont make your experience any better.

A brief note on the size of the scope. To the gentleman who claimed you couldn't see much with anything less than 8": I beg to differ. There are many wonderful objects that can be viewed through a smaller scope. Charles Messier himself used a scope that had the capabilities of today's 3" scopes. And his catalog of observable objects is a foundation for amateur astronomers everywhere.

Also remember that location plays a huge role in observing as well. The university in my town has a 20" compound telescope that is practically useless at its current location. There is simply to much sky glow sound the campus to make it worthwhile. A few weeks ago the astronomy club I am part of hosted a large open session and we were joined by several astrophysics students from the university. They were amazed at what I was able to do with my small primitive (no guidance systems) scope compared to all of their fancy equipment. Because they never bother to pack up their Meade LX-200s with the fancy computers and drive 10 miles out of town to get away from the light pollution.