World War 3 will commence soon with/without some form of bail out being passed, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 29-9-2008 @ 05:08 PM by baseball101
Read it and think about it. I have no sources but it is extremely logical. The U.S. is having issues with the middle east, then out of no where the economy is doing horrible ... and a plan is developed that will increase the nations debt a lot. It's a perfect set up if you think about it ... growing hate in the U.S. for the middle east by feeding the citizens hate propaganda towards the middle east ... obsession ring a bell? Soon after the bail out is passed (which some form of it will be) the U.S. will have an amazing increase in inflation, and the citizens will complain more and more until there is a terrorist attack that will be lead by Osama some how and their money and supplies will have come from Iran/Palestine/maybe North Korea somehow. This is the >perfect setup... the people are looking for a way out of economic turmoil ... then a terrorist attack 'magically' happens and the U.S. blames it on the ones it wants to go to war with .... and the people will follow thus boosting the economy and the filthy 'war lords' pockets....


What do you think? how long do you think it will be til we see the beginning of WW3 after the bail-out is passed?

edit: i was thinking it could also happen before any bail out is passed if it takes too long the U.S. will just do the terrorist attack then will blame it on some countries go and fight them .... "boost the economy and the filthy war lords pockets" and skip the whole thought of a bail out....

[edit on 29-9-2008 by baseball101]


reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 05:30 PM by ninthaxis
reply to post by baseball101



Well, I guess maybe no one told you this, but the bail out failed. There is no passing so there can be no WW3 right? Unless you are talking about a new bailout or something.



reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 06:51 PM by Now_Then
Originally posted by memememe
reply to
post by baseball101



WW3 started on 9/11/2001.


Well by that logic you may as well say there has only ever been one world war... 1914 - present day.


reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 07:24 PM by Universal Light
Originally posted by Now_Then
Originally posted by memememe
reply to
post by baseball101



WW3 started on 9/11/2001.


Well by that logic you may as well say there has only ever been one world war... 1914 - present day.


I think at that point it's semantical. You could say it's been 4,000 years or 300,000 years depending on view point.

IMO WW3 started 9/11/2001 but we're all agreeing to the same thing


reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 07:25 PM by Universal Light
Originally posted by Now_Then
Originally posted by memememe
reply to
post by baseball101



WW3 started on 9/11/2001.


Well by that logic you may as well say there has only ever been one world war... 1914 - present day.


I think at that point it's semantical. You could say it's been 4,000 years or 300,000 years depending on view point.

IMO WW3 started 9/11/2001 but we're all agreeing to the same thing
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Did NASA "bomb" the moon to hide something?
  Posted 1 days ago with 65 member flags
Is Planet X Approaching After all? How Much Evidence Do We Need?
  Posted 19 days ago with 18 member flags
New Plasma Battery Technology Probably Powering Stealth Sattelites
  Posted 14 days ago with 17 member flags
Nick Pope Interview on ATSLive, Got a Question to ask?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags
Will Planet X be visible during the eclipse on May 20th?
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama and the Card Game Illuminati
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags