A Strange Find, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 27-9-2008 @ 10:10 PM by Perseus Apex
reply to post by atzmaz



You should do a DNA check on the hair sample at your local Crime Scene Investigation Unit. Whether foul play was involved or not, I'm sure the descendants would be more than happy to pay you for a lost treasure. It should at least pay for your CSI examination. You win either way and perhaps some 'closure' if due is finally achieved. I would do this if I were you.

[edit on 27-9-2008 by Perseus Apex]


reply posted on 28-9-2008 @ 06:32 AM by Sonya610
Originally posted by Perseus Apex
You should do a DNA check on the hair sample at your local Crime Scene Investigation Unit. Whether foul play was involved or not, I'm sure the descendants would be more than happy to pay you for a lost treasure. It should at least pay for your CSI examination. You win either way and perhaps some 'closure' if due is finally achieved. I would do this if I were you.



Wow, I am amazed at these comments. Some people spend way to much time watching CSI type shows and apparently NEVER bother to read about real crime or real crime investigations. You guys are totally out of touch with modern day reality.

In reality about 65% of murder cases in the U.S. are solved. Most of the time the cases are solved within the first 2 weeks by standard methods, and if they drag on much longer they are ignored (unless it is high profile).

In the U.S. most states only collect dna from convicted criminals, though the feds now collect it from anyone arrested for a federal crime as of a few months ago. But the fact is the U.S. dna database is NOT that good (though if you happen to have relatives in prison the match may be close enough to put suspicion on you).

The fact is usable dna is often not that common (a fair amount of rape victims will NOT have usable dna on them from their attackers) and even if they find good dna at a crime scene there is a very good chance they won't have anything to match it too.

Now in the future it will be a lot trickier, the Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007 and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008 are designed to allow the collection of dna from all newborns. So 30 years from now the DNA database may be pretty darn good, but right now it is not. The world will be more complicated for serial killers in 30 years, but right now dna is still a relatively minor worry when it comes to getting caught.



[edit on 28-9-2008 by Sonya610]


reply posted on 30-9-2008 @ 02:51 PM by atzmaz
Originally posted by fox_3000au
I have a couple of questions:

1. Why post them on your Flickr account?

2. Why post the same pictures on your Flickr account, once in 2003, then in 2008?

3. Why is there no Exif data?

4. Why are these pictures taken at the site?

5. Why are there no close up pictures of the items you have found (that are discernable)?

6. Are/Why were these pictures taken at night?

7. Why do you keep trying too lead people towards thinking that these items have either an occult meaning or that they are connected with death/murder?

I have many more questions, hope you get around too explaining the ones asked above.

Cheers, Fox.


To answer your questions:

1. Why post them on your Flickr account? I don't normally use flickr. I actually use kodak gallery for my personal photos and tried flickr briefly but just don't like the interface. I saw that it did have some abilities that my other account didn't have so I downloaded them from one site to get the original sizes I uploaded.

2. Why post the same pictures on your Flickr account, once in 2003, then in 2008? As I said before I don't really use flickr, but had tried it briefly back in the day. Now I only put things there for ATS and for identification of rocks and minerals I find.

3. Why is there no Exif data? These were the pictures I downloaded from my kodak gallery repository. Perhaps I can find the originals on my network drive to get the Exif data for you.

4. Why are these pictures taken at the site? I brought my camera because the scenery from up there is amazing. The high cliffs, the water and boats and bridge below, and the beautiful sunset. We were actually sitting on the cliffs when I noticed the box half buried behind me.

5. Why are there no close up pictures of the items you have found (that are discernable)? I think its pretty discenable what they were. You can clearly see the tiles, the glove, but my camera wouldn't focus on the hair or chain clearly due to the diminishing light but you can see them if you zoom in. I tried several others that just didn't come out due to the flash washing them out.

6. Are/Why were these pictures taken at night? These were taken at sunset. We were there to watch it.

7. Why do you keep trying too lead people towards thinking that these items have either an occult meaning or that they are connected with death/murder? I'm definitely not which is why in my original post I gave no specific bend on what I thought they were. I do watch CSI and other shows like that quite a bit and didn't want to be swayed. I was just wondering if anyone else saw significance in these objects or a box of this type. Personally like I said it gave me the creeps, but maybe that was just me. To someone else they might have been happy to find it. I don't think we may ever know the answer but its something I felt would be appropriate to ask here in this forum.

Thanks for your questions, I will search for the originals to provide EXIF data.


reply posted on 1-10-2008 @ 09:45 AM by fox_3000au
reply to post by atzmaz


Thanks for the reply...

I am looking forward too what the rest of ATS thinks.

Hope you find what your seeking.

Cheers, Fox.


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 03:42 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Perseus Apex



neat idea.. expanding on that it might be cool to contact a local college and let the forensic students run with it


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 07:44 PM by BlueOx
reply to post by hotbakedtater



I'm an active geocacher and I have to say that we tend to use containers that are protected from the enviornment. Also the person who hides the cache is also suppose to maintain it. Meaning they have to continuously check up on the cache to ensure it is good condition. Another point I want to add is that all containers usually have some type of marking stating it is a geocache on the container or it has a sign in log inside with a brief description of the hobby. So, in other words, if the box was not marked or didn't have a log in roster inside it then it is not a geocache.

Maybe it is a time capsule or something of that sort.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Paranormal photos: separate the wheat from the chaff.
  Posted 7 days ago with 67 member flags
What the hell is this next to my son....?!?
  Posted 19 days ago with 42 member flags
Shared Dreaming Experiment
  Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags
To those who can have OBEs
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags
My Ghost Radar Predicts a Mega-Quake on June 15, 2012 at Noon!
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags
Bompa
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags