Originally posted by slugfast
if Illuminati means "illuminated one" isn't that a direct reference to who we are talking about?
Isn't this kind of like the "Imminent threat" vs "immediate threat" argument? are there any differences b/t Imminent and Immediate?
are there differences in the illuminati words?
If we are talking about a secret society that is Illuminated with knowledge, isn't this the same Illuminati we are speaking of?
I would say “no”. One of the problems comes from confusion in semantics. As used on this forum, the word “Illuminati” may mean one of three things:
1. A collection of people who are somehow more spiritually or intellectually enlightened than the majority. This is the word’s actual definition, and
is why practically all philosophers, poets, and early scientists considered themselves “illuminati”. This class is not actually a “group”...they may
not necessarily intermingle or know one another. Instead, they have merely gained extra insight into the human condition, which results in
“illumination”.
2. Another definition of the term used here is in reference to a semi-secret society founded in Bavaria in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt and Adolph Von
Knigge. This society was originally called the Order of Perfectibilis, but Weishaupt changed the name to Illuminati in order to reflect the Order’s
teachings, which were inspired by the philosophy of the so-called Age of Enlightenment. One need not have been a member of Weishaupt’s organization in
order to meet the first definition of an Illuminos; nor were all members of Weishaupt’s Illuminati particularly illuminated.
3. Another definition as often used here is some sort of secret cabal that is hellbent on world domination. Evidence suggests that this “Illuminati”
is fictional, existing only in the minds of conspiracy theorists. The “Illuminati conspiracy threat” was actually invented by Bavarian Jesuits in an
attempt to discredit Weishaupt’s group, which was becoming very popular among the liberals and intellectuals of Bavaria at that period.
For example, I could say that Galileo and Copernicus were Illuminati. By this, I would mean that they were more enlightened than most of their
fellows, not that they were members of Weishaupt’s fraternity, or that they cared anything about world domination. Actually, anyone who wanted to
control the world and boss people around would be the exact opposite of the Illuminati, since dictators are, by their very nature, NOT very
enlightened.
All three of these definitions have been applied to Freemasonry. When I received the 32° of Scottish Rite Masonry, I received a framed certificate to
hang on my wall, written in Latin, declaring me an “Illuminos,” having received the degree at the hands of my “Fratres Illuminati”. All this means is
that, ideally, my Masonic degrees should have enlightened me to some extent, with the term “Fratres Illuminati” simply meaning “Enlightened
Brothers”.
As for the second definition: both Weishaupt and Von Knigge were Masons, and they recruited from the local Masonic Lodges who, at least theoretically,
were sympathetic to their cause. Mozart and Goethe are examples of a few famous Masons who joined the Illuminati. This organization was suppressed by
the Jesuit Electorate who controlled the Bavarian government, was disbanded, and its members either arrested or sent into exile.
This is where the third definition derives. The Church, who held dictatorial power in much of Europe, saw what happened in the American Revolution,
and began to show its fear. They did not want freedom of speech and religion legalized, nor a democratic government, because they knew it would spell
the end of their power. Even as late as the 1860’s, Pope Leo XIII, in is anti-Masonic Bull “Humanum Genus”, rants on and on about the “devilry” and
“wickedness” of a free society, which the “evil sect of Freemasons” have fought for unrelentingly.
The Illuminati, like Masonry, challenged people to think for themselves. When a man thinks for himself in such a situation, he will soon find he has
been deceived by his oppressors, in this case the Roman Church and its kings who owed it allegiance.
But such a tyrant also understands that the masses are uneducated and superstitious, and used this to their advantage in their slander campaign
against the Illuminati and Masonry. They found they could use a scapegoat (Masons and Illuminati) to create fear, and through this fear they could
control the people.
It is not surprising that this nefarious tactic worked in 18th century Bavaria, where most people could not even read and write, half of them still
firmly believing the sun revolved around the earth. What IS surprising is that such beliefs continue even today.
Fiat Lvx.