It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Battleline
I have a thought for all of you that think the shootings at the colleges is a reason to ban guns.As horrable as these shootings are the fact that a gun iis used limits the collateral damage and if there were some (qualified) person at the schools with a weapon avaliable to them, it would limt shootings even more.
Here is my thought;what if a determined person had no gun so got themselves a TRUCK (big 4x4 1 ton)with a very large brush grille(you know the type on most SUV's),waited tell class let out and drove up and down the walkways, grassie areas hitting people tell he had enough our ran out of gas or the PD finelly showed up.How many people due you think this person would kill before it was over!!?? Sick?you bet but the point is there will always be humans like this so to take away a person's felling of security(Gun Ban)just because some think it will stop the Killing is a sad sences of your own security but you take the rest of us with you.
If you don't want to own a gun, fine,but leave the rest of us who are willing to stand and deliver in a time of need alone,it just might be your life we save,or your child..
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by matttheratt
You need an assault rifle to defend your house?
For the fiftieth time, no. Only an imbecile would use a rifle, any rifle, (with the possible exception of a PCC) for home-d. That's not the point.
Originally posted by bknapple32
I posted the stats up a little earlier in the thread. something like 10,000 out of 15,000 murders came from a gun.
[edit on 27-9-2008 by bknapple32]
Originally posted by TrueHusslin
Hey, nice sandals dude... I bet that picture was taken at some kind of Obama/save my sorry ass from my mangina rally huh?
People are going to kill one another with black market weapons anyways, no matter what kind of restrictions they put on legitimate gun owners... one of the reasons why there are restrictions on gun owners is because the politicians need a visible wiping boy, is to appease *SNIP*
Originally posted by TheHunted
The "Protect Ourselves From The Government" card is obsolete now. The Second Amendment was written during a time where there was pretty much a level playing field. The people and the government possessed the same type of weaponry. In this day of age the playing field is uneven, the government has the upper hand with their weapon technology not to mention the eyes they have in the sky. No matter what firearm you own, it is no match for the hell they could leash on us if they liked. So claiming that you want to own these Assault Rifles for for self defense against the government is irrelevant. If you want to feel safe you should invest your money wisely in Tanks, Bombers, and WMD's....
Originally posted by boaby_phet
Your going to run to somwhere else because you cant own a gun? that seems a bit silly, and i never really understood why americans make such a big deal about gun ownership..
noone needs guns!, guns are nasty little machines, simply developed to kill and hurt people or animals ( no, im not a veggie or against hunting!)
really, what do YOU need a gun for? and why does it upset you that you cant own a gun.. something that can only be used to harm someone.
on guns, america needs to stop living in the old times, this is 2008 ! not 1908.
guns are bad!, and the politicians are spot on with what they say , why they HELL does ANYONE need an ak 47 lying about their house unless their actualy at war and in genuine danger of someone shooting at the, ?
[edit on 25-9-2008 by boaby_phet]
Originally posted by bknapple32
simple... if the amount of deaths due to a gun matched that of some nut with a truck, then id agree to ban both. but fortunately thats not the case. I posted the stats up a little earlier in the thread. something like 10,000 out of 15,000 murders came from a gun.
Originally posted by bknapple32
Originally posted by TrueHusslin
Actually the picture was taken at the Kennedy Space Center. Yet another person without a picture attacking someone elses. I can see how you have so many negative points. Look forward you your post being removed.
Mod Edit: Snipped offensive comment carried over in quote
[edit on 27/9/2008 by Badge01]
Ha, good call! Great mods here at ATS....
I agree totally on everything you say. It's called logical thinking! Thanks for keeping it real.
What really bothers me about this thread is how people use statistics to justify lost lives. I don't care if the AWB saves just one life to me, thats worth the ban. I'm more interested in the lives saved by this ban then the stupid statistics people be tossing around.
Al Gore one the the 2000 election with the most votes and still lost. So statistics and numbers don't me jack to me. Ban all AW's! Ban all AW's! Ban all AW's! Ban all AW's! Ban all AW's!
Originally posted by PrepareForTheWorst
reply to post by TheHunted
So you are saying that if we ban all "assault weapons", lives will be saved? I keep forgetting that murders first came about with the debut of the "assault weapon"...silly me.
I just find it odd you saying "ban assault weapons" with an avatar of what I am assuming is you holding an M-16.
Originally posted by boaby_phet
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
noone needs guns!,
... guns are nasty little machines, simply developed to kill and hurt people or animals ( no, im not a veggie or against hunting!)
really, what do YOU need a gun for? and why does it upset you that you cant own a gun.. something that can only be used to harm someone.
on guns, america needs to stop living in the old times, this is 2008 ! not 1908.
guns are bad!,
... and the politicians are spot on with what they say ,
... why they HELL does ANYONE need an ak 47 lying about their house unless their actualy at war and in genuine danger of someone shooting at the, ?