Originally posted by Moegli
Instinct would no longer exist if one is aware of every minute detail of reality.
instinct (ĭn'stĭngkt') Pronunciation Key
- An inherited tendency of an organism to behave in a certain way, usually in reaction to its environment and for the purpose of fulfilling a specific need. The development and performance of instinctive behavior does not depend upon the specific details of an individual's learning experiences. Instead, instinctive behavior develops in the same way for all individuals of the same species or of the same sex of a species. For example, birds will build the form of nest typical of their species although they may never have seen such a nest being built before. Some butterfly species undertake long migrations to wintering grounds that they have never seen. Behavior in animals often reflects the influence of a combination of instinct and learning. The basic song pattern of many bird species is inherited, but it is often refined by learning from other members of the species. Dogs that naturally seek to gather animals such as sheep or cattle into a group are said to have a herding instinct, but the effective use of this instinct by the dog also requires learning on the dog's part. Instinct, as opposed to reflex, is usually used of inherited behavior patterns that are more complex or sometimes involve a degree of interaction with learning processes.
1. an inborn pattern of activity or tendency to action common to a given biological species.
2. a natural or innate impulse, inclination, or tendency.
3. a natural aptitude or gift: an instinct for making money.
4. natural intuitive power.
It has been theorized that if the brain can be aware of every subatomic particle and its behavior as it courses through space, the collisions, magnetic and gravitational influences etc, then one can be aware of fate/destiny.
The only question would be, how far into the future can you see? Time as we perceive it has an interwoven mechanism which ties directly to space.
Four dimensional awareness would therefore be mastery of time.
Of course if one is aware of anything, one can change its path in time.
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
reply to post by buds84
If you'd like to logically show me where I look dumb and where I've made a mistake then I'd be more than willing to admit it.
Originally posted by Moegli
You're trying to represent the properties of dimensions other than three, in a three dimensional physical perspective (therefore failing to comprehend whether they exist or not).
If anything exists in 1D 2D and 4D they wouldn't be 'objects' anymore.
In 1 dimension, it is a point of (NO) space and infinite energy/potential.
2D would be a flat plane or grid, if looked on its side
There is an outward progression of the way 1D (God existence) is expressed, by DETAIL. There simply wouldn't be as much possibilities that could be interpreted in 2D as much as in 3D, the more dimensions exist the more detail is perceived.
Once you reach infinity you'd find yourself back at ONE. Nothingness.
"Once you can accept the universe as matter expanding into nothing that is something, wearing stripes with plaid comes easy. " - Albert Einstein
Originally posted by buds84
reply to post by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Everything your posting = "because you said so"
models of large extra dimensions, the string and Planck scales become accessible at future colliders. When the energy scale is above the string scale or Planck scale a number of interesting phenomena occur, namely, production of stringy states, p- branes, string balls, black hole, etc. In this Proceedings, we summarize a recent work  on the production of black holes, string balls, and p-branes at hadronic supercolliders, and discuss their signatures. I. INTRODUCTION In a model of large extra dimensions (ADD model) , the fundamental Planck scale can be as lowas a fewTeV, which is made possible by localizing the SM particles on a brane while gravity is free to propagate in all dimensions. The observed Planck scale (∼ 10 19 GeV) is then a derived quantity. Signatures for the ADD model can be divided into two categories: sub-Planckian and trans-Planckian. The former has been studied extensively, while the latter just recently received more attention, especially black hole production in hadronic collisions. The fact that the fundamental Planck scale is as lowas TeV opens up an interesting possibility of producing a large number of black holes at collider experiments (e.g. LHC) [3–5]. Reference  showed that a BH localized on a brane will radiate mainly in the brane, instead of radiating into the Kaluza-Klein states of gravitons of the bulk. In this case, the BH so produced will decay mainly into the SM particles, which can then be detected in the detector. This opportunity has enabled investigation of the properties of BH at terrestrial collider experiments
The questions "where have the local baryons gone, and what are their properties?" are being answered with greater certainty than ever before. "We think we are seeing the strands of a web-like structure that forms the backbone of the universe," said CU-Boulder Professor Mike Shull. "What we are confirming in detail is that intergalactic space, which intuitively might seem to be empty, is in fact the reservoir for most of the normal, baryonic matter in the universe."
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth - Sherlock Holmes