New FAST System Sniffs Out Suspects (New), page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 24-9-2008 @ 06:49 PM by newagent89
Last year, New Scientist revealed that the US Department of Homeland Security is developing a system designed to detect "hostile thoughts" in people walking through border posts, airports and public places. The DHS says recent tests prove it works.

Project Hostile Intent as it was called aimed to help security staff choose who to pull over for a gently probing interview - or more. Commentators slated the idea that sensors could spot people up to no good from their pulse rate, breathing, skin temperature, or fleeting facial expressions. One likened it to the "pre-crime" units that predict criminal behaviour in the movie Minority Report. However, last week, the DHS science unit gave an update on the project, now dubbed the less-hostile-sounding Future Attribute Screening Technologies (FAST) programme. And, if DHS claims are to be believed, the research appears to be getting somewhere. At an equestrian centre in Maryland, 140 paid volunteers walked through a pair of trailers kitted out with a battery of FAST sensors, including cameras, infrared heat sensors and an eyesafe laser radar, called a Bio-Lidar, that measures pulse and breathing rate from a distance.

Some subjects were told to act shifty, be evasive, deceptive and hostile. And many were detected. "We're still very early on in this research, but it is looking very promising," says DHS science spokesman John Verrico. "We are running at about 78% accuracy on mal-intent detection, and 80% on deception." That sounds incredibly high at such an early stage in the research - but only tests on vast quantities of real people, rather than eager volunteers, will present any real test. Questions remain, however, as to how secure the system is. The machines could reveal health conditions like heart murmurs and breathing problems as well as stress levels - which would be an invasion of privacy. But Verrico says FAST has been through stringent privacy controls (pdf) and that the data is never matched to a name. It is only used to make decisions about whether to question someone, and then discarded.

The trial technology was installed in a trailer because it is planned to be easily transportable, so that FAST trucks can appear at any sports or music event as required. They look set to become as regular a sight at such events as mobile toilets and catering trucks. But is going to make a real difference? Or will bad guys learn to play the system and render it another piece of what expert Bruce Schneier dubs "security theatre". Given that the FAST approach is not much different to the long established - and long established as unreliable - polygraph, that certainly seems plausible.

www.newscientist.com...



Here is an Department of Homeland Security Visual Overview of the FAST system
.
www.newscientist.com...



Cool or Scary? Personally, I think it is cool, but unnerving.


reply posted on 25-9-2008 @ 01:06 AM by newagent89
reply to post by Grey Magic


To fool it, take mind altering drugs like anti-depressants before you pass through. They will find a way around and we will not feel any better. I am frustrated for the people who work hard to bring about this technology.


reply posted on 25-9-2008 @ 02:07 AM by newagent89
reply to post by baffledon911


Asking your opinion: If there is no conspiracy concerning 9/11 on America's part and it was simply Muslim terrorists linked to Al-Qaeda responsible, what measures should be taken to ensure American homeland security from future attacks? Should they do this? People only coming from a viewpoint of conspiracy on these topics is not a conducive means of promoting stimulating conversation. Future posts, try to at least provide your opinions, in part, from the viewpoint of no conspiracy. Or just post what you feel.


reply posted on 12-11-2008 @ 07:00 AM by spikey
reply to post by newagent89


Of course this won't work!

Pure propaganda technology, basically a psych weapon.

A gold star goes to anyone who can tell me in rational terms just how such a system is going to be able to differentiate between some furtive, evasive would be bomber, and someone who:

1) Is late for his/her flight or train or whatver and is anxious.
2) Someone who is at a clandestine meeting with say an illicit lover or similar.
3) Having a bad day, argument with wife/husband.
4) Been fired from their job.
5) Marriage breakdown
6) Kids driving you bannanas.
7) Mislaid or had stolen property, wallet, phone, laptop, briefcase etc etc

The list could go on and on as i'm sure you lot could come up with loads of these examples.

So, this system cannot work as described. It would produce at least an equal number of false positives and real ones.
Or maybe that is exactly the whole idea. Use it indiscriminately, then everyone, guilty or otherwise will be subjugated by the technology. As we all know...you can't argue with a machine can you. If it SAYS your guilty, then you're guilty, right?

spikey.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Sno-Trains..A short History..(with short video)
  Posted 13 days ago with 16 member flags
Pictures: Civil War Sub H.L. Hunley Finally Revealed
  Posted 7 days ago with 5 member flags
Neuroscience the new face of warfare: experts
  Posted 3 days ago with 5 member flags
Congress Passes Bill That Opens US Skies To Unmanned Drones
  Posted 2 days ago with 4 member flags
The Latest in Terminator Tech
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags
U.S. Navy to test 32 megajoule EM Railgun in the coming weeks
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags