It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why hasn't this video received more attention?

page: 4
66
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 25 2008 @ 11:32 PM
link   
This $700 bailout,er,robbery, is at least $5 trillion plus one bank alone has $90 trillion in bad derivitives (morganchase)plus the ones it bought dirt cheap from WAmu today.There is no oversight allowed on this deal. It is like Henry Potter(elitists) telling George Bailey(us) he can save the bank & trust (401ks,pensions,etc) if he would only accept this deal.
George had the good sense to reject the deal and we need to react in kind or we are freaking doomed(Mogambo).Say NO to the bailout and NO to George Bush/pals
Vote for Ron Paul if it makes it that far;thats why the used-car salesmen want this deal now ,before the elections.
Tell everyone you know about what is really happening ;not what the MSM spoon feeds us(except for Dodd).Rise up and throw the bums at the Fed (not federal,has no reserves) out now,even if it takes a crowd with burning torches to do it. If this deal goes through they will control every aspect of our lives.

[edit on 25-9-2008 by seabisquit]




posted on Sep, 25 2008 @ 11:41 PM
link   
Thanks for posting this full interview - I'd never seen it although I've heard Russo interviewed by Alex Jones on the radio several times. I was taken aback when I heard Russo articulate the Libertarian trio of "violence, theft or fraud" as the only valid reasons to interfere with another's liberty.

I'm going to share this video with 700 or so Missouri lawyers tomorrow afternoon and maybe one or two of them will actually watch it. The great thing about spreading truth is that you never know who you're going to inspire...

Jazzyguy is right, kcfusion, your cry for change must be directed inward in order to be most effective. If you get a chance, read "As a Man Thinketh" sometime. It available online for free.

The only way to improve the Country is for each one of us to sacrifice what we can of our personal lives by working for the cause of Liberty. Freedom isn't free, they say. That is why I'm running for State Representative.
kcfusion, I hope you live in Missouri's 39th District so you can vote for me!



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 12:05 AM
link   
Thanks op for posting this video. It confirms a lot of what I've been reading in other ATS threads. All this is very interesting and eye-opening but I seldom have the time (work/kids) to dig stuff like this up so I really appreciate all those on this site who have brought things like this to our attention. Thanks.

starred and flagged



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 02:13 AM
link   
Great video, it was my first time seeing it.

My brother and I observe a lot of this stuff and we are quite open to these truths.

This video does help encourage me to expose truth to others. At least to open to their eyes to what is possible.

I had a conversation with my dad about it and he laughed and didn't believe it. Every question he asked was answered in the videos.

Even though I want to reach out to them, I must accept that he can't accept it. He's my dad and he's used to the way the world is. I don't believe i should bother him about it, he would much rather just live his life by enjoying being with those he loves.

There's something that's been wandering in my head. I want to ask opinions from my aunt and uncle about these things. My uncle is an FBI undercover agent who has done some missions in iraq and my aunt is military intel who has done some undercover missions in iraq. I just want to know what they think of it all.



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 02:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by Electro38
Amazing to me how everyone just buys into something without any discrimination, only because it supports or perpetuates their beliefs.

- Wrong! I have only seen this video lately and have been doing my research Aaron is reconfirming what I already believe.

So we're all supposed to believe every word this guy Russo said? Why?

- Why would he lie?

He seemed to be a very smart, talented guy. He made some great points about government and the banking industry/fed bank.

- Exactly see my above question.

If we're just going to jump on board with someone's beliefs without being discriminating or critical, only because it seems to support our own beliefs, then how can we even begin to find the truth?

Im not jumping on board his beliefs, Im reconfirming my own.

I personally believe they are all full of crap. I don't think this guy was telling the truth. Maybe he "thought" he was, but that's still not "the" truth.

Listen this guy was best friends with a rockefeller and as you said he is a very intelligent person. I believe he had the brains to decipher the truth from BS. Man believe what you what to believe, if videos like this cant open your eyes, how the hell I am supposed to.


It was a very interesting video. My thanks to the OP for posting.

No problem.

P.S. Can someone spell check this posts headline. It's receive. "i before e except after c." Not "recieve". And the apostrophe is placed where the missing letter "o" would go. Hasn't, not has'nt.

Yeah foolish me, I started this thread when my brain had not yet woken up and did not realise I could not edit the thread title. I have asked a mod to fix already but no sign. Thanks for the spell check.




[edit on 25-9-2008 by Electro38]



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 04:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by T0by
1/2 way through the video, gtg back to work now.
But I have a question.

Why would a Rockefeller tell Aaron these things considering he had made the video 'Mad as hell'.

Edit: At work now. = ) Can't wait to get home to watch the rest.
Anyway hope someone can answer my question. Maybe it'll be answered itself once I watch the rest of the video.

Aaron made Mad as hell before he spoke to a Rockefeller ( That's my understanding )

Having watched 'The money changers' just yesterday, the whole supposed history of the bankers and various families involved such as the Rothchilds and Rockefellers, it seems very very out of character for any of them to mention any of this to anyone without good cause or reason.

- They could have mentioned this to him for a number of reasons because as Aaron says they wanted to recruit him to their side, he was best friends and who knows what was talked about over drinks especially with Aaron being interested in what is actually going on the government. It could easily come up in conversation. Why would he tell him, maybe because he is so confident that there would be f all Aaron would be really able to do.


ESPECIALLY to:
Someone who has produced films, has somewhat of a celebrity status
- has the means and knowledge to spread the message, if he does not like what he has been told by the Rockefeller.

and is nearing an old age and has less to lose than others may
- increases the chance of him choosing to spread the Rockefeller message

- Look at video Aaron tells you why. Its up to you if you believe him or not. As I have said before why make up such lies.

My critical thinking ( yes, Aaron told me to use it ) tells me a Rockefeller would not speak of these things to such a person.

- I encourage you to use your critical thinking. Question everything and you find the answers your looking for. I dont think your assumption of whether or not they would tell him is a bad one. Use your sense of judgement based on his character and the ease at which he talks about things. He is most certainly not telling lies imo.

That being said, i still believe what Aaron says is true. I have more reason to believe than not to, once I have weighed up the whole situation.

Good man, always ask questions and then make your mind up for yourself


[edit on 25-9-2008 by T0by]



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 04:26 AM
link   
Over 6000 views of the thread, hopefully this means that the message is getting out there. Makes me feel all warm inside



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 05:09 AM
link   
reply to post by kcfusion
 


Yeah I finished watching the rest of the video and you're probably right.
And yes I still believe he is most likely telling the truth.
I'm just surprised the Rockefeller spoke of it so openly. Hmmm

One thing I've realized though...... how should I put this......

Some people think there is a grand master plan which has been going on for years. I'm not so sure.

With every new generation of elites we have to remember, yes there are some main strategies they have been using and they don't deviate from them. There has always been the goal of staying in total control via the banks. That struggle continued for a few generations at first until it was solidified in their favor.

What other goals did they have apart from this? Was it merely at first to only stay within financial and political superiority?
Who is to say their ultimate goal was decided upon 200 or even 100 years ago?

Somehow i get the feeling that as time goes on, and society evolves, so do their plans.

I'm sure that with the technological advancements we have had this century, the plans and goals for them have also changed.
50 years ago, a chip being planted within civilians would probably not have even been dreamt of by these people.

You know what the scary part is? The technological advances we have had in the past 50 years, and the ones which will be made in the future,
If in the wrong hands and directed the wrong way, would take slavery and oppression to whole new levels not achievable in the past.

What's even scarier is that with the way the world is today, and the technology we now hold....... the timing is almost ripe to move away from simple financial and political control and take things to a whole new level.

---Edited to add: IF they choose to do so. That's the thing. We don't know how far they will take it.
They could be a) Wanting to merely keep society in check, whilst causing us occasional pain and suffering in order to keep their power
b) Working towards actual big brother domination of the entire world.

Another scary thing is, it would only take one generation of truly evil elites, for option B to take effect.---

We don't really know which elites are running things these days. They may have a completely different set of objectives to that of their forefathers.

[edit on 26-9-2008 by T0by]

[edit on 26-9-2008 by T0by]



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 05:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by T0by
Yeah I finished watching the rest of the video and you're probably right.
And yes I still believe he is most likely telling the truth.
I'm just surprised the Rockefeller spoke of it so openly. Hmmm


Yes that does seem strange. Plus the Rockefeller was visiting Aaron's house and discussing this stuff. How hard would it be to catch a recording of it? And why didn't that happen? If you believed someone has an evil plan for world domination (or any evil, criminal plan for that matter) why not gather evidence of this plan when this person hangs out at your house and tells you all about it?

Plus this business of them using a magic vaccine that sterilizes people in Africa, well if that is in fact happening the population should be affected really soon now huh? Yes it should, and is it? I haven't heard anything about that. Until we see a big drop in birth rates (in at least some areas) I don't believe one WORD of it.



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 06:19 AM
link   
No idea about the Africa thing. But just because they may have been mislead on one thing doesn't mean the rest isn't true.

Was it Alex that brought up the africa thing, or Aaron saying it was the Rockefeller? I think it may have been Alex.

True about the recording thing. But remember, he hadn't spoken with him since 9/11 and who knows how long before that. The full severity of the issue may not have sunk in until after that time, by then it was too late.

During their conversations he may not have had any intention of taking things to this level, i.e interviews.

I'm not really defending, i'm offering alternative options.

I think i've actually argued against something I believe to be true in a thread somewhere. Only because it was an alternative point not brought forth yet.

[edit on 26-9-2008 by T0by]



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 06:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by T0by
No idea about the Africa thing. But just because they may have been mislead on one thing doesn't mean the rest isn't true.


The interviewer in the video briefly mentioned something about vaccines in Africa being contaminated the AIDS virus, if I recall correctly. I would think their dry sex practices, prevalence of open sores from STD's, along with extreme promiscuity is enough to spread the disease pretty effectively without outside help.


Originally posted by PhatcatLike in Africa, where children being inocculated where chemically made sterile in the process.. it barely got mentioned anywhere but it's genocide avant la lettre comitted by the loving doctors of the UN!


This is where the sterilization thing was mentioned. I say the proof is in the results, and until we see results I won't believe a word of it.

[edit on 26-9-2008 by Sonya610]



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 06:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sonya610

Originally posted by T0by
No idea about the Africa thing. But just because they may have been mislead on one thing doesn't mean the rest isn't true.


The interviewer in the video briefly mentioned something about vaccines in Africa being contaminated the AIDS virus, if I recall correctly. I would think their dry sex practices, prevalence of open sores from STD's, along with extreme promiscuity is enough to spread the disease pretty effectively without outside help.


Originally posted by PhatcatLike in Africa, where children being inocculated where chemically made sterile in the process.. it barely got mentioned anywhere but it's genocide avant la lettre comitted by the loving doctors of the UN!


This is where the sterilization thing was mentioned. I say the proof is in the results, and until we see results I won't believe a word of it.

[edit on 26-9-2008 by Sonya610]


I think the African issue is seperate, and may or may not be true. Since alex mentioned it, who really cares. As people on this board often say, he can't be completely trusted. I'm sure he gets fed alot of bs along with occasional truths. So you can't blame him if he gets things wrong sometimes.

Even so, I know there is alot of info out there on that topic. If you haven't read up on it, maybe you should check it out.

Everything Aaron himself said seems very convincing to me.
Especially the part about the womans liberty (?) movement, having an outwardly good motive but ulterior motives ultimately benefiting their finance.
This ties in so so well with how they operate and coincides with everything I have read over the past week ( I've done lots of reading ). But that's the first I've heard of it.

Of course he could have done his homework and made it up to give his story some weight. But damn..... that really is how they do things, so perfectly.

And a reminder, this man has no reason to lie whatsoever. I'd love to hear of any reasons someone may have.

But until then, if you boil everything down and research what he's said, if you come to any other conclusion than at least LEANING towards the 'its true' side, you truly do have a closed mind and I doubt anything will convince you.

[edit on 26-9-2008 by T0by]



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 06:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by T0by
Even so, I know there is alot of info out there on that topic. If you haven't read up on it, maybe you should check it out.


It is a good video. I have never paid attention to the conspiracy theories on the topic because so many seem to mention the Bush administration, and in my mind it is simply unbelievable to think they are smart enough to plan such a thing (and act honestly surprised when it happened).

But linking it to intelligent people, and implying Bush and most others are clueless puppets, well that adds a whole new twist.

And yes the women's lib part was very interesting. I believe if this is all true then their efforts are targeting certain "demographic elements" in our world as they could cause the most problems if the masses decide to resist.

On the question of why he didn't record any of the convos, okay the illusive forewarning of 9/11 may be to vague to have taken seriously. But if a Rockefeller started rambling on about chipping people and being able to control all credits/debits I would take THAT stuff seriously considering the source. That idea has been around for a long time, and if one of the richest, most powerful men in the world starts talking about it, it would have to be seen as more than a joke, though maybe it was a joke because supposedly Rockefeller kept telling Aaron he would have a chip that marked him as untouchable, KMA for example, and considering Aarons age it does not seem realistic in his lifetime. Surely Rockefeller would know that. But if Aaron heard it and BELIEVED it that would be reason to gather evidence if it indeed happened.


[edit on 26-9-2008 by Sonya610]



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 08:33 AM
link   
reply to post by T0by
 


Interesting take on it and to honest I think your right on the mark. Who knows how much their plan have changed since its conception. They might have started with great intentions for the world however who knows how much this plan has changed with sons moving up the ranks each one with their own views on what the "plan" is. I think it is very scary that they have such power at their finger tips and thanks to Aaron we get a glimpse of how this generation of the Elite thinks. It does not bode well for the world.



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 08:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by silo13
The problem is - once awake?
What can we do about it?


I used to ask myself the same question, but I believe its all about bringing the truth to the people. If the information about how the world really works is explained to the sheeple and presented with unbiased fact Then those people tell others and so on and so on. Potentially the world could change overnight, after all we 'slaves' are the ones that hold the key to all of this.



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 08:49 AM
link   
I mostly believe what i've read and heard about this topic, except one thing draws me down and puts abit of doubt into my mind.
It's just all too perfect, they are so good at this, it's almost beyond genius.
I suppose it's possible to come up with the perfect plan again and again but really, can they be that good?
I suppose they've had centuries of practice, but all of that accumulated knowledge would have to be passed down and actually studied by each one. On top of that they would have to always be highly intelligent.

It makes you wonder how spread out the planning and decision making is. Apparently they do have meetings, which would help I guess....

I know one thing they've definitely learnt though...
It's how easily people can be controlled and made to believe things. I guess if you have the money and power and know how to apply it, and have the patience, perhaps what they've done is achievable.

It seems like it's only being going on in its present form on and off, in certain countries for a few centuries, but they've certainly had a good run. And the grip only seems to be tightening. I think we've had our chance and lost it. It would take alot to remove them now.



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 09:47 AM
link   



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 10:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by T0by
reply to post by kcfusion
 


Yeah I finished watching the rest of the video and you're probably right.
And yes I still believe he is most likely telling the truth.
I'm just surprised the Rockefeller spoke of it so openly. Hmmm



Look at Paulson's original bailout bill. Who in their right mind proposes something like that, exempt from oversight even from the courts? And he was surprised that it didn't pass without question. So there's definitely a level of arrogance involved. The assumption that we're just too stupid to figure it out, even when it's right in our face.



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 10:26 AM
link   
I don't think there is so much variation in the general plan, tbh.

Create an incident.
Make sure the incident gets total overexposure.
Having innocent people suffer makes sure you got the sympathy vote.
Blame it on your 'adversary' , and call anyone suggesting otherwise traitors.
Before common sense has a chance to set in, be sure to have your troops on the ground and a lot of dead 'enemys'.
Commit atrocitys all you want, just don't get caught with a camera doing it.

and last but not least: true Independant newsgathering on the battlefield leads to failure. Thruth and War are incompatible.



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 10:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phatcat
I don't think there is so much variation in the general plan, tbh.

Create an incident.
Make sure the incident gets total overexposure.
Having innocent people suffer makes sure you got the sympathy vote.
Blame it on your 'adversary' , and call anyone suggesting otherwise traitors.
Before common sense has a chance to set in, be sure to have your troops on the ground and a lot of dead 'enemys'.
Commit atrocitys all you want, just don't get caught with a camera doing it.

and last but not least: true Independant newsgathering on the battlefield leads to failure. Thruth and War are incompatible.


Those are tactics, not a plan.



new topics




 
66
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join