Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to post by Skyfloating
I have changed my order to include Mr Hancock's books once again. Thank you for reminding me that there are some posters who have negative views on
alternative history authors such as Mr Hancock. The order is waiting for Jim Marrs latest book to be released, so I have time to change the orders
back and forth.
When you get it, read what he writes about Pacal's tomb at Palenque.
He basically robs Von Daniken, claiming that the carving there shows a "spaceman" operating the controls of his flying machine.
Problem is, when that old con man Von Daniken wrote that, Mayan had not been translated.
When Hancock repeated the falsehood, Mayan had been translated.
Hancock never bothered to find out that the Mayans described what the carving shows.
It ain't no spaceman.
Read what Hancock tells you about "flash frozen mammoths."
It's based on an original hypothesis that dates back to the turn of the twentieth century.
What he doesn't tell you, and he apparently never bothered to look, is that the entire hypothesis is completely false. Everything in it is wrong.
Yet Hancock parrots the outdated and completely wrong idea as if it were true, never once even stating that there might be more to it than he
says.
The mammoth thing is one subject Hancock has had to back down on over the years since this travesty of a book was first published.
"Fingerprints..." is filled with such examples.
Read it and then search ATS on the various subjects if you want to learn how Hancock has lied to you and taken your money.
Or, find the book at a library and feel better about yourself.
Harte