Serapis - a genetically engineered Hybrid?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 44 times


reply posted on 24-9-2008 @ 10:46 AM by kidflash2008
reply to post by Skyfloating



I have just finished reading Colin Wilson's book "Atlantis and the Kingdom of the Neanderthals". I know, it sounds like a title to an Indiana Jones movie. He states that civilization may be hundreds of thousands of years older than previously thought. He gives evidence in the measurements used worldwide and ancient sites that were built on even older sites. He doesn't go into the ancient astronaut idea of Von Daniken or other ET theorists, but there is a lot of info in there about ancient Egypt.
I have ordered Graham Hancock's Fingerprints of the Gods to read more on this subject for an alternative view.
I have starred and flagged this thread.


reply posted on 24-9-2008 @ 12:35 PM by Skyfloating
reply to post by kidflash2008



Colin Wilson is always recommended.

But if you can, try to get hold of some of the Daniken books that were either

a) Taken off the market or
b) not officially published in English (look for unofficial copies)

This List shows me that his most important books werent even published in English.

See if you can find a copy of the book "According to the Evidence".


reply posted on 24-9-2008 @ 04:49 PM by letthereaderunderstand
reply to post by Skyfloating



I just wanted to say, that I have seen these "Hybrids". They are spiritual beings. They appear to morph into different things and are exactly how the Ezekiel describes them being part animal and human, woman and man. One moment it's a human face, the next a lion, the next an alligator, although I don't remember seeing wings on the ones I've seen. They are quite awing and can be very frightening. It also appears as if they are "spinning" like a whirlwind.

Peace


reply posted on 25-9-2008 @ 11:53 AM by kidflash2008
reply to post by Harte



I have ordered Mr Hancock's book to read his take on the aspects of civilization being much older than previously thought. I know conventional wisdom is that civilization began 8,000 years ago, but that can change as new findings are found.
P.S. all myths and legends are based on some type of fact. To state that Atlantis is a total myth IMO is wrong. You are entitled to your own opinion, and that is fine.

[edit on 9/25/2008 by kidflash2008]



reply posted on 25-9-2008 @ 12:10 PM by Skyfloating
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to
post by Harte



I just canceled the Hancock book until I can do more research on him. Thank you for the up and up about him.



It would be better if you formed your own opinion rather than being swayed just because some anonymous internet-poster says something.

Make up your own mind.


reply posted on 25-9-2008 @ 12:21 PM by kidflash2008
reply to post by Skyfloating



I have changed my order to include Mr Hancock's books once again. Thank you for reminding me that there are some posters who have negative views on alternative history authors such as Mr Hancock. The order is waiting for Jim Marrs latest book to be released, so I have time to change the orders back and forth.


reply posted on 25-9-2008 @ 12:34 PM by Harte
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to
post by Skyfloating



I have changed my order to include Mr Hancock's books once again. Thank you for reminding me that there are some posters who have negative views on alternative history authors such as Mr Hancock. The order is waiting for Jim Marrs latest book to be released, so I have time to change the orders back and forth.


When you get it, read what he writes about Pacal's tomb at Palenque.

He basically robs Von Daniken, claiming that the carving there shows a "spaceman" operating the controls of his flying machine.

Problem is, when that old con man Von Daniken wrote that, Mayan had not been translated.
When Hancock repeated the falsehood, Mayan had been translated.

Hancock never bothered to find out that the Mayans described what the carving shows.

It ain't no spaceman.

Read what Hancock tells you about "flash frozen mammoths."

It's based on an original hypothesis that dates back to the turn of the twentieth century.

What he doesn't tell you, and he apparently never bothered to look, is that the entire hypothesis is completely false. Everything in it is wrong.

Yet Hancock parrots the outdated and completely wrong idea as if it were true, never once even stating that there might be more to it than he says.

The mammoth thing is one subject Hancock has had to back down on over the years since this travesty of a book was first published.

"Fingerprints..." is filled with such examples.

Read it and then search ATS on the various subjects if you want to learn how Hancock has lied to you and taken your money.

Or, find the book at a library and feel better about yourself.

Harte


reply posted on 27-9-2008 @ 08:22 AM by Hanslune
reply to post by Skyfloating



The message was to you in particular the comments on how to improve your presentation and make them more believable.

Why no comments about myths? So what is the sun? What do the myths tell us?



reply posted on 27-9-2008 @ 03:22 PM by TheWayISeeIt
reply to post by Skyfloating



Sky - Manetho was a historian.


He was indeed. To highlight your point I will quote from wikipedia where they repeatedly state that modern mainstream archaeologists and Egyptologists rely heavily on his writings and consider it the final word on many fronts.

Impact of Aegyptiaca:

It is clear, however, that when it was written, it would have proven to be the authoritative account of the history of Egypt, superior to Herodotus in every way. The completeness and systematic nature in which he marshalled his sources was unprecedented.


Most modern scholarship that mentions the names of the pharaohs will render both the modern transcription and Manetho's version, and Manetho's names are even preferred to more authentic ones in some cases. Today, his division of dynasties is universally used, and this has permeated into the study of nearly all royal genealogies through the understanding of succession in terms of dynasties or houses.


LINK

Interesting that he is considered to be have written 'the most authortative account of Egytian history', yet when he chronicles that which does not suit the conventional view of current academia his authority goes out the window.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 6 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 3 days ago with 80 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 14 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 15 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 10 days ago with 21 member flags