Just the fact that this supposedly sources from the Kremlin, lends no credence to it whatsoever. Russia has enough problems with their Mainstream News Source, Pravda (which is an ever loving joke), let alone some unsubstantiated sources.

Originally posted by atlasastro

Originally posted by Reddupo
Can there please be some rule against posting Sorcha Faal articles in breaking news? It rips down the credibility and the usefulness of this forum.

Yes, ban it, and then lets look at the next target. Rense, or maybe Prison Planet. What about the BBC,Fox and CNN, did'nt they report something similar to the OP's source, that being that the USA Military and govt. believed that Iraq had WMD too. Lets Ban everything. Please....

There is more evidence for the existence of WMD's in Iraq than you obviously have knowledge of. Most of it was conveniently brushed under the carpet when much of the MSM became disenchanted with OIF. This article on the other hand reads like a Pravda Periodical where they claim they have more beautiful women on one subway car alone, than other nations have in their entirety.

Originally posted by MischeviousElf
...Nuclear weapons in a suitcase or not have a "shelf life" and need constant monitoring and looking after.

The suitcase nukes everyone fears are the Russian ones, given to their embassies in the cold war, however even the Russians admit they are now "out of date" and wouldn’t work anyhow.
...

This is true. They need polonium for their triggers to function, and they have to be replaced every 2 years, if I remember correctly.

Anyone remember any news stories involving polonium in the last two years?

Originally posted by snowen20
would a suit case nuke and a mini nuke be one in the same?

Often I hear sut case nukes referred to as dirty bombs.

[edit on 23-9-2008 by snowen20]

suit case / mini.. possibly the same yeah

dirty bomb is a bit different, ill give you a crude example below:

everyone knows a nuke.. big boom, cool lookin mushroom cloud, and burning flesh that no sunblock can protect against.

dirty bomb - itd be like exploding something thats radioactive.
no mushroom cloud, no burning skin. just a whole bunch of radioactive material (eg: nuclear waste) spread around an area, possibly some being carried away by wind.

Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Anyone remember any news stories involving polonium in the last two years?

*cough* putin *cough*

look back for when putin took office, you'll see pulonium poisoning is one way a few of his critics have passed over the years.
not easy stuff to obtain apparently, either. due to small quantities being produced each year.

just a quick question.
Why would a terrorist group try and take out the Pakistan leadership.?

Surely the only one who may have got anything out of this would have been those with an agenda to fight terrorism and needed the approval of the Pakistan leaders to enter the country.

Originally posted by 44soulslayer
I doubt that any CIA covert op would provide the Taliban with nukes... there is nothing for America to achieve by doing that

Ever heard of the New World Order?

They need an event, and it needs to be a big one.

Soorcha Faal has been known to be an enemy of America and off meds more than on.

Question. Why would you need a three ton truck to deliver a suitcase nuke.

It was on the order of the Murray bomb. Diesel/fertilizer. Sorcha needs sanctioned.