Originally posted by ULTIMA1
It states they are unable to respond within 20 days. Why do you have to twist or misquote post, its shows a lot of immaturity?
I guess he just misread, I also did the first time, their wording is not good.
But they do say the material exist don't they?
Yes, but your request is for "materials related to the intercept of Flight 93", it says nothing of any shootdown at all.
Let me be quite clear here, a document saying that Flight 93 was
intercepted does
not show that Flight 93 was
shot down. I just
thought I'd nip this in the bud as far as I am concerned in case this is the evidence you intend to present as proof.
I believe that the requirement for people to stop posting was to be decided by moderator, so perhaps we could get a pre-emptive judgement on what
exactly would count as evidence of a shoot down.
edit: I may have been mistaken as to the situation regarding fighter intercepts! I am no expert with Flight 93, so it may be that documentation
showing Flight 93 was intercepted may disagree with the current "official story". If this is the case then more debate might be needed! Don't take
my post above as being set in stone. It does look like I may have been mistaken, so it may not be appropriate to dismiss your claim based on this
criteria.
[edit on 25-9-2008 by exponent]