Iran touts "Israel should be eliminated from the universe"

page: 5
1
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 22 2008 @ 06:29 PM
link   
reply to post by UmbraSumus
 


"Israel sitting on an undeclared Nuclear stockpile having never had a weapons inspection , threatening another nation over a POTENTIAL weapon .
In a world of such double standards ..........i worry for our future. "
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh dear! Thats a bit hit and miss Isn't it? Israel may have nuclear weapons but it Isn't threatening anyone with them is it?
Iran are actively seeking a nuclear programme and at the same time are calling for Israel to be wiped off the map. You don't have to have a PHD in astrophysics to work out who would be in the crosshairs if Iran ever did get their hands on a nuclear weapon.




posted on Sep, 22 2008 @ 07:39 PM
link   
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


Oh, I get it. Splitting hairs is an academic exercise that really has little practicality. You sound like a lawyer. I think we've all seen our legal system go tits up over technicalities and this particular behavior pattern of considering nuance and hair splitting.

Ask yourself this. If this radical Islamic country is even trying to obtain nuclear technology, and it has made numerous threats, and it refuses inspections, then do you not see a problem with this?

Without any evidence of attack, Hitler could have been stopped cold in 1938, and even early in 1939. But since no one had any "proof" of his intent, he was allowed to continue to pursue his production objectives.

If he had been addressed in 1939, there may have been as many as 500,000 casualties. Is 500K casualties good? Of course not. But by not stopping things when they began to smell, 52,000,000 people died over the next five years. Which is better? 500,000 deaths today, or 52,000,000 spread over the next five years?

That's what nitpicking will get you. That's what waiting for the perfect time will get you. That's what linear thinking will get you.

Hesitation is ruin. Hesitation is another word for cowardice. Cowardice is another word for prey. Prey is another word for dead.

Yeah. I get it.



posted on Sep, 23 2008 @ 03:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Mintwithahole.
 


I hear your concerns , and its not like i`m on a bullhorn for Ahmadinejad , i was just playing devils advocate . Listening to people make throw away statements like "nuke em"" bomb em all & and let Allah sort em out " ".... glass car park " etc etc it really upset me.
There have been some very dangerous precedents set over the last 8 years . Extraordinary rendition / suspension of Habeas Corpus and the preemptive doctrine , whats to stop other nations following suite ?

Is it too much to expect every nation to follow the same rule of law ?

Do you think Iran would begin a nuclear exchange with Israel ?
Correct me if i`m wrong , but hasn`t that alleged "wipe Israel off the map" been proven to of been incorrect ?
Will Robbie score a derby hat-trick ?:


Edit; add sentence.

[edit on 23-9-2008 by UmbraSumus]



posted on Sep, 23 2008 @ 04:28 AM
link   
reply to post by UmbraSumus
 


ummm re-read? i didnt say that now did i ..... time to say sorry and look at your feet for a while while you decide what to do next

i understand why you said it your just poiting at the wrong person


[edit on 23/9/08 by noobfun]

Dooper the problem with the snake analagy is it isnt on your door step ... its in a field behind yourhouse and the kid next door keeps poking it with a stick, and it keeps poking the snakes friends too

and when the snakes get annoyed the kid runs around screaming "they are gona bite me for no reason help me help me help me"

what would you do stop the kid from poking the snakes or get him a bigger stick as your suggesting?

Iran isnt the one threatening to invade everyone read the words, its shouting to keep the worlds eyes on iran so if they get sneak attacked it wont be brushed under the carpet. if we are attaacked, when we are attacked .........

if iran get the bomb chances are they will use it in self defence, i know i must be an evil terrorist right? its had the chance to use its chem weapons before and didnt everyone said india has the bomb soon as pakistan does its meltdown ... its a power balancing act mutually assured destruction despite the rhetoric iran isnt any more willing to wipe its self off the map then Israel is

Israel is scared its the only hold it has in the middle east its a bully and as soon as one of the other countries gets as big as him he is scared his ass is gonan kicked for shoving everyone around

this gives israel an itchy trigger finger on those nukes it has and wont allow to be inspected and the chem weapons and its bioweapon stash too.

if iran getting a nuke starts a nuke war my moneys not on them bieng the one to fire it off first

and the only differance between those nationalists waving ak's and shouting death to "insert country here" and the nationalists waving AR-15's and deer rifles and chanting death to "terrorists" is they have a clear idea who thier enemy are

but yes lets demand iran is inspected lets see exactly what it has, then lets do the same with israel lets force our way in and go look around

[edit on 23/9/08 by noobfun]

[edit on 23/9/08 by noobfun]



posted on Sep, 23 2008 @ 05:53 AM
link   
reply to post by noobfun
 


Originally posted by Fathom
reply to post by noobfun

No you didn`t say that noobfun !
As it says , it was originally posted by FATHOM , in a reply to you.

So would you like to revisit your statement....
noobfun; re;
" ummm re-read? i didn't say that now did i ..... time to say sorry and look at your feet for a while while you decide what to do next "



posted on Sep, 23 2008 @ 07:00 AM
link   
reply to post by UmbraSumus
 



the highlighting shows my name

with a quick read it makes it appear i said it

quick edit would be appreciated



posted on Sep, 23 2008 @ 08:34 AM
link   
reply to post by UmbraSumus
 

"
Do you think Iran would begin a nuclear exchange with Israel ?
Correct me if i`m wrong , but hasn`t that alleged "wipe Israel off the map" been proven to of been incorrect ?
"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I honestly think they would! You have to remember from everything that has been said and the way Iran seems to be baiting America to attack it, it is clear that old "Dinnerjacket" Isn't playing with a full deck! Iran could benefit hugely from America who is holding out the hand of friendship and offering it's help yet all Iran wants to do is antagonise the west. Dinnerjacket is clearly insane.
As for the second part of your question. Not only has it not been debunked but, If I'm right, he's threatened Israel more than once.



posted on Sep, 23 2008 @ 08:42 AM
link   
I think the best approach to Iran is to let our Europeans FRIENDS know that we will for the time being no longer worry about Iran. That is up to them to confront Iran. Iran is a bigger threat to Europe than us at this moment. I think we should then turn around and let Iran know of our intentions to lay back and give them this warning, if you Iran threaten us, harass or attack our ships, sponsor any terrorism against us we will be willing to respond in kind with everything we have if necessary. I think we should then tell Israel that they have the right to defend themselves but that if they go into Iran they are on their own. If we did this I am sure that the Europeans would take a different approach to Iran and Israel wouldn't have to worry about Iran's threat. As it is now Europe is using us to be the bad guys while they continue to do business as usual with Iran. It is time for them to take the lead. Iran with nukes could affect Europe more than us at this time.



posted on Sep, 23 2008 @ 08:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by jam321
I think the best approach to Iran is to let our Europeans FRIENDS know that we will for the time being no longer worry about Iran. That is up to them to confront Iran. Iran is a bigger threat to Europe than us at this moment. I think we should then turn around and let Iran know of our intentions to lay back and give them this warning, if you Iran threaten us, harass or attack our ships, sponsor any terrorism against us we will be willing to respond in kind with everything we have if necessary. I think we should then tell Israel that they have the right to defend themselves but that if they go into Iran they are on their own. If we did this I am sure that the Europeans would take a different approach to Iran and Israel wouldn't have to worry about Iran's threat. As it is now Europe is using us to be the bad guys while they continue to do business as usual with Iran. It is time for them to take the lead. Iran with nukes could affect Europe more than us at this time.



Wow! I wish you were president. Thats the problem Isn't it. Since when has America ever kept their nose out of other peoples business? America see's itself as the rulers of the earth- or earths police force. Sometimes its a good thing, usually its bad! Its simply not in their nature to take a back seat and live and let live. If you can't do the bombing then nobody else can either, which is evident the way that America refuses to let Israel defend itself for fear of upsetting the other wealthy arab nations, especially Saudi Arabia, who are lining Bush and his cohorts pockets with gold!



posted on Sep, 24 2008 @ 01:58 PM
link   
Bomb a country that hasn't attacked Israel.. thats great more murders.. remember you can't fight fire with fire.. if Israel goes thru with this the repuccussions would be severe for Israel.. Israel is surround by Arab nations and Russia would back Iran...even if the U.S got involved.. so essentially what you are calling for is a nuclear war... and the chances of Israel being wiped off the map would be considerably higher if Israel attacks.. Be careful what you wish for... for you just might get it.



posted on Sep, 24 2008 @ 07:03 PM
link   
reply to post by dooper
 


reply to post by dooper
 


No I don't think you get it. America is in the biggest financial crisis since WW2 and the two conflicts we have been involved in have contributed greatly. Now you want a 3rd conflict in the near east just to teach big mouth Ahmenijhad a lesson? You can't be serious at all.

If it means life and death for Israel then go ahead and bomb them but I think america needs to keep out of it. We simply can't afford more conflicts without solid evidence that Iran posses nuclear weapons and is ready to use them. The evidence must be 100% convincing this time.

Go ahead Israel and defend yourself. You certainly have the firepower and waiting for a "green light" from washington is probably unnecessary. Why wait any longer? Are you ready to accept responsibility for whatever happens next? I doubt it!



posted on Sep, 24 2008 @ 11:55 PM
link   
Friend, there's no such thing as 100% certainty until it's too late. And most of our costs have been oriented toward setting up the infrastructure in these two countries. Believe me, we won't be rebuilding a cotton-picking thing in Iran.

Right now our military is getting lots of practical war experience, we are gaining thousands of battle tested NCO's, we are getting real-world feedback on our weapons systems, and we are already in the neighborhood.

I'll be perfectly honest. Our generals, unlike Israeli generals, don't know their trade. Our generals are administrators and logistic specialists which we could get from Wal-Mart or UPS. Our generals can't lead a battle. They aren't anywhere near a battlefield. All they can do is point. A military is supposed to be a war machine, which means quick, overwhelming force of arms. No niceties, no such thing as the term "collateral damage." The military is not a police force, nation builders, ambassadors of goodwill, and certainly not to be tasked with winning hearts and minds. You want their hearts and minds, you grab 'em by the gonads, and you have everything you need.

If we had performed in a military manner, immediately after the fall of the Iraqi military, we would have disengaged and maneuvered in the distant desert, ready to strike if necessary.

(Same thing in Iran. Properly outfitted and supported by air, 20,000 men can run amok throughout the large country of Iran, and make the 10,000 of Zenophone look like amateur hour.)

This roaming army in the distant Iraqi desert would certainly have threatened Syria, and scared the crap out of Iran. For good reason.

No, Israel can do it. Russia won't lift a finger because it will be over before anyone has a 100% proof that Israel is going to do anything. Besides, any nuclear weapons targeting Iran, properly dispatched, cannot be traced back to any country of origin. After all, it could have been an in-country nuclear accident! Or Sunni versus Shia, or Moderates versus fundamentalists. You don't have to take them out head on. Sneak around where no one is looking and take the back of their head out.

Did you notice a while back when a number of nuclear weapons were being transported across the country, and accidentally discovered? Could un-inventoried weapons be launched from a tramp steamer in the Indian Ocean? And then abandoned? You better believe it. Who fired these nukes? Take your pick. But as you seem to determine is the defining criteria, no one could prove this with 100% certainty.

Besides, if there is truth in the Old and New Testaments, then Israel is here to stay. No matter what enemies array themselves against them, no matter how powerful. I know I'll get crap over that, but it's as plain spoken as day.



posted on Sep, 25 2008 @ 01:57 PM
link   
reply to post by noobfun
 


NEWS FLASH: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad doesn't hate Jews!!

I've found a speech he gave in Iran talking about the same letter he sent to George W. Bush asking how he and his administration can claim to be Christian while doing things that are in polar opposition to the teachings of their Messiah. And he goes on record (in front of his countrymen and women) as NOT being anti-Jewish, how the Jews and Muslims are “the only ones who believe in all Divine Prophets” and that those claiming to be Jewish while committing atrocities in Palestine are not Jews but “a bunch of corrupt criminals”.

Watch this:


www.youtube.com...



posted on Sep, 25 2008 @ 02:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Abu Issa
 



Yeah, glad you raised the issue, Abu Issa

because there are many .. and I'm one .. who believe Amadinajad is not anti-jewish/israel at all ! In fact, there's every reason to believe he's working for jews/israel and is of jewish extraction himself.



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 03:19 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 12:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Fathom
Interestingly enough Reuters has a different translation for what was on the banner:

Trucks drove past bearing large slogans reading "Down with Israel" and "Down with USA."

www.reuters.com...

I wish we had an Iranian ATS member that acually saw these banners and could tell us what they really said.


Yeahh hopefully the Iranian would say the banners said stop posting racist bile fathom!You want to bomb them, you dispicable racist.
I hope you sprout your murdering BS out in the real world,and someone teaches you the errors of your way in person(fn big smile)

If I said I wanted to bomb america or my country I would expect in these modern days the boys in blue to come round and feel my collar.shame the Iranians cant send round some of their boys to sort you out.Perhaps they can!Go on my persian friends,shut the racist up





posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 10:33 PM
link   
reply to post by noangels
 


Iran's days are numbered. By their own determination. They want nuclear weapons, and by God, they're going to get them.

They want war and the destruction of Israel, and it will be their destruction that they bring down on their own heads.

It' just lucky for Iran that I don't have my finger on the button.



posted on Oct, 22 2008 @ 04:49 PM
link   
Yawn

Had fun saying that


Hey you got a few stars from ATS racists,who would have thought that!

If only my finger was on a button that could wipe you out Like you want to with Iran,wouldnt give it a second thought my racist friend



posted on Oct, 22 2008 @ 04:56 PM
link   
Hahahaha if Israel does attack Iran then say goodbye to Israel. has everyone forgotten that Russia backs up Iran and most of the middle east as well??

im not choosing sides. if Iran wants nuclear weapons let them build them. Why shouldn't every country have nuclear weapons.



posted on Oct, 22 2008 @ 06:33 PM
link   
reply to post by noangels
 


Now why do you want to make that personal?

And let me point out one glaring element of ignorance you seem to have a problem with.

A racist is someone who prefers his own race, or hate those of another race.

Since Persians are white, and I'm white, there can be no racism.

I just hate the bastards.





top topics
 
1
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join