It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by argentus
Another observation: Most of the folks I've talked about this seem to be voting against someone rather than for a candidate. "I can't stand X; I'd rather have anyone but him."
Originally posted by HollowPointPeace
reply to post by Blueracer
I believe what she was trying say is that he does not care about anything past the dems race. You smack of trollism.
Originally posted by justxxme
reply to post by toasted
what I was referring to by "handful" was the number of candidates before the dem/rep candidates were officially chosen. Now it may be down to two, but those two were (supposedly) chosen by votes. ""
Look, "We the people" depend on a "free press" for info on whom to vote for, since the press is controlled, they get to cull the herd by how and who they cover...it is JUST THAT EASY.
The best candidate [ ron paul ] never got the coverage he deserved, it was a hatchet job by omission. Not to mention all the untrue rumors of him dropping out, not to mention the rallies for him that were not covered by our so-called free press.
So the best candidate was easily removed from being a threat to those chosen by the bildergerger crowd.
We got screwed again, and most folks haven't got a clue.