It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Woman Gets Life Sentence For Sex With 5 Year Old Boy

page: 4
2
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 02:02 AM
link   
You know, I usually respond to these with the standard "I just threw up in my mouth a-little" type of reply, I have a 6 year old grandson and I just died a lot tonight.
I'd want the woman dead.
My God, How are any of you thinking that this might in some fashion be O.K.?
That poor child. His life is shot.




posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 02:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
...My take is the woman accused, has and most probably is still under some form of mind control. ...


Yes, because those that have vaginas between their legs can NEVER, EVER be evil people, or do evil things, can they?

I am absolutely so sick of our society giving a free pass to women who do horrible and evil things. "They must have been abused!", "They were afraid", "They didn't know it was going on", (and on here) "They were mind controlled"

Get this through your thick heads: There are women who KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY do evil things, just as there are men who do the same. Quit excusing them.

And to those who think that woman got a harsher sentence than a man would have: Look at all these female "teachers" lately that have been screwing their students. Look at how easy the system goes on them.

One more thing: When an underage female has to pay CHILD SUPPORT for a child that resulted from her molestation, THEN we can talk. There has been case after case of very young men being molested by women, they end up pregnant, and the kid has to pay CHILD SUPPORT.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 02:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by MatrixBaller04
Actually, now that I've read this thread and thought about....How does a woman rape a 5 year old boy? Like, how is it physically possible?


yes i too wondered this - if the boy isnt pubescent there is NO WAY he could have done anything with her... so it was all her doiing and i hope that this boy is mentally and physically okay!

well... facing the death penalty?
the islaamic punishment for a rapist is stoning to death...

and don't worry, that husband did NOT get off lightly...
he died a disbeliever and is currently being tortured in his grave for every sin he ever committed, and that is untill judgement day when he will be thrown into hell for eternity!
if they kill her i assure you, i swear by God, she will NOT get off lightly!



you know what's sickening,
i know of a foster mum who took in a baby of about 4 months who had been rapes by a member of her family...
she was destroyed!
did that guy get life or death??? pfff

like the rest of you have said - sick double standards!



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 02:32 AM
link   
Good, that's disgusting, anyone who abuses a child is nothing, but trash and deserves worse. Hopefully that kid gets adopted to a good family.

[edit on 20-9-2008 by laiguana]



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 02:33 AM
link   
hmm killing someone over their heinous crime doesn't make you a better person but really just lowers you to their standards. Plus people don't live in luxury when their own freedom is taken away with time in prison. Sure it's better living than the poor. But I wouldn't want to be in lock-up for 20 years of my life.



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 02:50 AM
link   
reply to post by sir_chancealot
 


Emotional babble.

Open minds remember? Conspiracy site?

So you've read up on mind control and who is behind it, and how it operates?

Z



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 04:01 AM
link   
reply to post by MatrixBaller04
 



What I hate is they never ask the vicitim if it was consentual. Did that boy agree to it? Did he ask first and she agreed? Did he enjoy it and watned it to happen?


Before I ask you if you’re out of your ever living mind - I’m going to take a step back and think on this a minute.
My conclusion?
You’re begging to get flamed, to receive a rash of attention, or you’re just too ignorant to even visualize the scope of the absurdity of your post.
So I’ll let it go.
I refuse to *feed* such absurdities.

****************************

It’s harsh, her sentence, but not harsh enough.
Death she deserves and death she should get.
I wonder if the *life with no parole* has something to do with the videotaping for profit?
I would assume that plays a part in it for sure.
But most of the posters here seem to share my opinion that male pedophiles, (who in my own opinion) perform much more horrible acts - get less prison time.

It makes me wretch, the whole thing, especially when there’re people out there how would even question - even consider!!! - such an act possibly being *consensual*.




...metal pole. gas. wire ties. match. last smoke on their way out...



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 04:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by MatrixBaller04
What I hate is they never ask the vicitim if it was consentual. Did that boy agree to it? Did he ask first and she agreed? Did he enjoy it and watned it to happen?

There's just so much more that people don't get the answers to.

For all we know, the kid enjoyed it and it was consentual. So why the life in prison? For having sex with someone? That's rediculous.


That someone was FIVE years old. A child. A minor.

I suggest you go seek help, seriously.



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 04:15 AM
link   
Not thinking of the crime, or how horrid this human being is. What I really want to know is, why did the garbage man view the tapes they had been thrown away? Is your garbage considered public domain? Not to say I don't think this woman should be in prison, but what are the rules on garbage diving?



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 04:20 AM
link   
This woman gets life in prison for frotting a five year old.

With a half-decent lawyer, any one of us could get fifteen years for murder. Probably less!

Think about that for a second, folks - especially you stupid psychos demanding death and mutilation of this woman.

This chick did something stupid, illegal, and possibly, potentially psychologically damaging to a kid. Okay, hey, punish her, she broke the law, no problem. But to give her a harsher sentence than would have been doled out if she cut the kid's throat?

That's stupid.

Demanding her torture and dismemberment and god knows what else? That's also stupid. You all look even more perverted than her right now. I realize this is all a combination of Christian bloodlust and the necessity to out-extreme people on the internet, but goddamn, get a grip, you stooges.



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 05:19 AM
link   
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
 


You need to remember that there are a lot of moms and dads reading this topic, and to them, torturing and raping a smile child is WORSE than any act of murder to an adult. Don't like it? Tough, because you'll never change their minds.

I do agree about the overreaction in this thread, though, but again, there's really nothing you or I can do about it other than to ignore the thread and move on.

[edit on 9/20/2008 by SonicInfinity]



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 05:26 AM
link   
This world is just foked up, i never even knew there was paedo's before i was around 21. When i heard about it, i could not believe it, but this is sick.



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 06:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by MatrixBaller04
Who the hell knows if they can or not. have you ever sat down with a young child and asked them if they wanted to have sex and see what they say? No. So how are you so sure?


Uhhhh...now some of us are wondering if YOU have asked a 5 year old if they wanted to have sex. So have you? And what did they say?

That is just twisted.



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 06:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Hypntick
 


The law generally is if it is in the trash at the curb it is public property. Anyone can look through your trash: garbage men, homeless people, even police. I also wonder what the guy was hoping to find by watching the tapes but I'm glad they got this scum off the street.



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 06:50 AM
link   
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
 


It is odd to think death is a fitting crime for this when the same penalty would have been given for murder. Is this just as bad as if she had murdered the child? No, I don't think so! I can't imagine anyone agreeing to that, so yes you made a valid point.

The thing is this women is clearly broken. And people like her, broken like her, repeat and repeat and repeat these kinds of evils.

So... do we let her out in 5 years to do it again?...

10? 11?

30? 40?

2 months in rehab?

Her soul is not working man. I think it might have left her.

[edit on 20-9-2008 by Lucid Lunacy]



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 07:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Yeah, but as a female, I have to say I think it is sexist.

Not that she doesnt deserve that, but male sex offenders and pedophiles rarely get that kind of sentence.

Some data on sentences in Texas which is not known for its soft and liberal treatment of criminals.

www.window.state.tx.us...



Between 1991 and 1997, the number of sex offenders in Texas prisons increased by 130 percent. The average sentence length for sex offenders increased from 13.9 to 15.1 years, mainly because of increased sentence lengths for sex crimes against children. The average sentence length for sexual assault of a child increased from 16.5 to 18.6 years.


Again, before I get flamed all over the place, I am NOT saying that she didnt deserve the punishment. I think she does. I am saying that ALL pedophiles deserve that sort of punishment. And that I believe that the females get harsher treatment because it violates our sense of "women as the protectors of children," while we almost seem blase when it is another male pedophile.
There is no way to tell this sexist. The judge chooses the sentence and remember sentences aren't placed within strict rules or regulations. Sometimes judges deal with cases on a personal level, but as a woman you should know that women are taken overly serious in court I've seen it many, many times. I've seen women make up a lie to get their husband, or boss, or neighbor in trouble. The court usually leeways to the women when they are the supposed victimized. I'm not denying what you are saying, but women have more power or better chance in court systems. My guess would be that the judge was absolutely disgusted with the crime and handed her a nice fat sentence.



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 07:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Lucid LunacyThe thing is this women is clearly broken. And people like her, broken like her, repeat and repeat and repeat these kinds of evils.


Well actually in her case she was in all likelihood doing it at the bidding of her (now dead) husband. I doubt if she is likely to repeat the act on her own, however she is obviously so weak willed and easily influenced she COULD possibly hook up with another nutcase and commit more heinous acts.

She sounds like a very out of touch and not too bright individual. Anyone that has a clue, or knows anything about child pornography, would know that posessing those videos was a FELONY. Not only did she make the tapes, and keep them for years, but she threw them in the trash WITHOUT destroying them first.

She didn't think about that because she does not take a personal interest in child porn, she is a stupid woman that went along with the sick ideas of her husband.


[edit on 20-9-2008 by Sonya610]



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 08:25 AM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


The victim doesn't remember the act? Well, that pretty much throws the "she ruined his life!" bit right out the window. And many of you people want her hurting the rest of her life or dead? Who's the sick one now?



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 08:25 AM
link   
blah

[edit on 20-9-2008 by flyindevil]



posted on Sep, 20 2008 @ 08:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by flyindevil
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


The victim doesn't remember the act? Well, that pretty much throws the "she ruined his life!" bit right out the window.

Repressed memories rarely stay repressed.. the fact that he can't remember it might suggest it was blocked out because it was too traumatic to remember so it might still resurface and ruin his life. Regardless it does not make it any less of a crime.

[edit on 20-9-2008 by riley]




top topics



 
2
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join