posted on Sep, 19 2008 @ 06:33 PM
I really liked the first part of the documentary about the collapse of the three buildings. I also liked the part about the Pentagon. A lot of valid
questions were raised that are, as of yet, unanswered.
However, When it came to the part of the Hijackers and Osama Bin Laden, they were all over the place.
Case in point:
First of all, they deny that quite a few of the alleged hijackers were involved and turned up alive. (Which may be true, but I was not convinced
because of the lack of evidence presented).
Then they allude that they were not fundamentalists (but provide little to no proof), that they were probably paid by a US governmental body (CIA? to
instigate these atrocities. Again, only anecdotal evidence is presented albeit from semi-reputable sources.
They give the example of the unscathed passport of one of the alleged hijackers. This is where they totally lost me: Do you know that at Lockerbie,
the manual of the cassetterecorder, that was part of the explosive devise, had been found UNSCATHED (a one page manual at that) in a field by a
She presented this manual to the crash site investigation team, only to find that mere scraps of it remained when the lockerbie trial commenced and
she was called to the stand. They never gave a plausible explanation for the delapidated state of the evidence. However, initially it was untouched.
It flew from the suitcase the bomb was in and, although it had a few scorch marks around the edges, it was completely intact.
Then they go on and say that the FBI and CIA were informed of an imminent attack on several targets in the US and with Aircraft by a terrorist group,
but that they ignored these warnings. To their detriment as we all know.
They exhonorate Bin Laden from any responsibility, or so it seemed to me.
I don't know the answers and I know that a lot of lies have been spouted and fed to us as the official truth.
It is blatantly obvious that these truths are as substantial and honest as a Twinkie. A total fabrication.
However, we must stick to facts and only facts and that is where Truthers, in lack of a better name, fall short.
The facts alone are enough to make scientists and experts scratch their heads and go..."hmm hold on here, this smells of BS" and could swing the
tide for all of us wanting truth.
Then for documentary makers to resort to conjecture really does let the side down and ultimately does not help this cause.
Their conjecture and reaching can discredit any good work they may have done in the past and blemish their reputation.
I feel ambiguous towards this documentary. It was very good up till part 5. After that, don't bother. For that alone I am very disappointed.