It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (CNN) -- He's the man Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin affectionately calls her "first dude."
Todd Palin was introduced to the nation at the Republican National Convention as a blue-collar oil worker, a laid-back father of five and a world-record-holding snowmobile racer.
Todd and Sarah met in high school at a basketball game and eloped in 1988, six years after graduation. Todd grew up in Alaska and is part Eskimo. He's an avid outdoorsman and champion of the Iron Dog snowmobile race.
He's worked in Alaska's oil industry and as a fisherman. But in recent times, he's had another role. Some call him the "Shadow Governor."
*snip*
CNN has seen thousands of e-mails released this year from the governor's office that show that Todd Palin was copied on hundreds of them. The topics of the e-mails ranged from public criticism of Sarah Palin to her meetings with corporate leaders.
Andrew Halcro, who ran as an independent against Sarah Palin for governor in 2006 and is a critic of the Palins, wants to know why Todd Palin was being copied on state correspondence.
Halcro wrote a blog post about Todd Palin called "Shadow Governor" and says, "Todd plays the role as kind of the fixer."
Even Halcro found himself the subject of e-mails that Todd Palin was copied on. He wants to know why.
"This whole process, and the whole string of e-mails, to me really raise some red flags," Halcro said.
He's not on the state payroll, but lawmakers say he is a central figure in his wife's policy agenda.
Stephen Branchflower is one man who certainly thinks so. Branchflower was hired by the Alaska Legislature to investigate Governor Palin's firing of the state's top cop - Walt Monegan - and whether the Palins pressured him to fire the governor's former brother-in-law, trooper Mike Wooten.
*snip*
Branchflower wants to subpoena Todd Palin because the governor's husband "has spoken to numerous government employees. ... He's such a central figure to the events."
Sarah Palin has denied exerting any pressure to have anyone fired. Todd Palin hasn't spoken publicly about the case, but his wife's attorney said Thursday Mr Palin would not comply with the subpoena request. The McCain campaign said the Legislative Council was no longer carrying out "a legitimate investigation because it has been subjected to complete partisanship and does not operate with the authority that it had at the time of its initial authorization."
The list of still-secret emails includes a series of messages that circulated on February 1, 2008, among Palin, Bailey, Frye, and Todd Palin "re Andrew Halcro." A former Republican, Halcro ran as an independent against Palin for governor in 2006, collecting only 9 percent of the vote. Since then he has been a blogger who often criticizes Palin. There is no telling what the emails said about Halcro. But in a July blog posting, Halcro asked, "why in the world is Todd Palin getting copied on emails [about me] that his wife's administration is classifying as confidential....These emails should be released to the public....after all Todd Palin has no standing to claim executive privilege. By including him in the email loop, the Palin administration has arguably breached any claim of executive privilege." And McLeod wonders, "What do emails about Andrew Halcro have to do with policy deliberations?"
The list of confidential emails includes a number of communications related to the Public Safety Employees Association, a union for the state's police officers and state troopers, and the headings refer to PSEA ads and a "PR campaign." Many of these PSEA-related emails were CC'ed to Todd Palin—and were also withheld under the deliberative process and executive privileges. (Recently, John Cyr, the PSEA executive director, told The Washington Post that Sarah Palin held a grudge against the state troopers and held down their salaries and other funding because her ex-brother-in-law-the-trooper had not been fired.) A separate email sent from Frye to Bailey and Todd Palin and headed "I may be in trouble here guys" was withheld because it involves a personnel matter. In April, a series of emails with the subject line "from Sheila Toomey" zipped between Sarah Palin, Bailey, Frye, other Palin aides, and Todd Palin. Toomey writes the "Alaska Ear" political gossip column for the Anchorage Daily News. These emails were also withheld under the deliberative process and executive privileges. And a string of emails titled "Racism on the Radio" that went back and forth between Governor Palin and her aides was blocked from release on the same grounds.
Originally posted by 27jd
So he can just "not comply" to legal subpoenas? Okay, I'll remember that if I'm ever recieve a subpoena since he's no more a legal part of the government than I am. McCain's choice for VP never ceases to amaze me.
Mr Palin has refused to comply with a subpoena issued over the investigation.
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
However, I don't think it uncommon for spouses to play some role in office, whether public (like Hillary and her health care initiative when her husband was in office) or private. It would be naive to think that a spouse's input doesn't affect to a degree the decision making process of the individual in office.
Originally posted by 27jd
I don't know if you work in an office, but if you do, is it common place there for management to copy their husbands/wives on company emails?? Do you think other employees who have worked there just as long as those managers appreciate it if somebody's spouse who doesn't even work there is making more policy decisions than they are?? I know Palin cans anybody who speaks against her, but if she was working for a major business she would not be able to do that. This is wrong on SO many levels....
Originally posted by rcwj75
I for one could give two poops about her husband reading her emails....and anyone who does makes no sence.
Originally posted by Sublime620
No. It is not common place, nor acceptable, in any business for a high ranking employee to carbon copy an email regarding official business to a person who isn't employed there.
Originally posted by 27jd
I was asking that rhetorically of the poster who said that was normal, lol. Guess I should have been more clear. [edit on 19-9-2008 by 27jd]
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This is the tip of the iceberg. But it's nice to see it's getting some exposure. Palin's entire staff have said that they won't be honoring the subpoenas.
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
My comment wasn't about 'cc'ing' emails and I stated that I did not agree with this pactice. I was making a generalized comment about spouses having influence in the decision making process, whether public or private.
However, I don't think it uncommon
The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorized and prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments.
No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by anti-virus software.
Originally posted by rcwj75
I for one could give two poops about her husband reading her emails....and anyone who does makes no sence. What a life...Hi I am your political represenative and now that I am in office will have no contact with my spouse about anything I do....yeah OK...yet more people making something out of absoulutly NOTHING!!!