It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
University of Florida mechanical and aerospace engineering associate professor Subrata Roy has recently applied for a patent to build a circular aircraft that can hover in the air like a helicopter without any moving parts or fuel.
The saucer will hover and propel itself using electrodes that cover its surface to ionize the surrounding air into plasma. Gases (such as air, which has an equal number of positive and negative charges) become plasma when energy (such as heat or electricity) causes some of the gas's atoms to lose their negatively charged electrons, creating atoms with a positive charge, or positive ions, surrounded by the newly detached electrons.
Originally posted by Amniodarone
In addition, the EFD can only operate in mediums where there are enough atomic structures to allow for ionization. That means that it is absolutely useless in the vacuum of space.
Originally posted by Amniodarone
Think of it as a "skimmer on oil".... If you continue to pour oil in front of it, you continue to go. The "sucking" of the atmosphere would have to be enormous to provide any ionization at all... and you need something to move against. An expanding sphere of molecules in the vacuum of space would not allow sufficient ionization to propel anything. In fact... all the researches specifically state that this propulsion will not work in a vacuum. So, surrounding your "spacecraft" with molucules would not yield anything.
Originally posted by RichardPrice
Dont get your hopes up - the patent office these days doesn't do its job, you can find all sorts of real rubbish in there including perpetual motion machines, antigravity machines, teleporation devices, free energy machines and a lot of propulsion systems.
This is simply another one to add to the list.
Originally posted by firepilot
Its not the patent office jobs to determine how workable a concept is, or if it is even valid. They issue patents based on an idea being unique, not on if it works.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
what if you recycle the air-plasma? You only need it in front of you to make the ship stop or slow down. In zero gravity the gas cloud turned plasma would be where you put it. And if you have enough energy from let's say a cold fusion plant, you could create a strong magnetic field around the ship holding the plasma in place. And what about dark matter? Will we one day learn how to make propultion and energy out of what they say are the most abundant elements in the universe? In the vacuum of space you don't need continous propultion, you just need a push in the right direction, and the ship will accelerate into cosmos until someone step down the break pedal.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Then how do you explain how the universe seems to be expanding and how this expansion is accellerating even? Where there is no friction as in the vacuume of space there is nothing stopping an accelerating object from accelerating further. In the vacuume of space, if I throw a ball, what will stop it from further accelerating? Nothing, because of stored kinetic energy, it would keep on accelerating until the object turned into pure energy, and still it would continue accelerating in longer and longer, broader and broader waves, changing colors from ir, through red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet and uv, through the radio active wavelengths (or maybe reversed or mixed order) until it turns into, well, not much at all, perhaps a cosmic wall, end of the road, shell of the universe, or cosmic radio noise or even dark matter. Even Einstein was wrong at one point in his famous theory of general relativity. For speed of light isn't really constant. Photons move at different speeds at different wavelengths.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
In the vacuume of space, if I throw a ball, what will stop it from further accelerating? Nothing, because of stored kinetic energy, it would keep on accelerating until (snip a complete load of twaddle)
Originally posted by Amniodarone
You must be mistaking the "stored kinetic energy ball throwing" scenario with the high school physics demonstration of throwing a ball on earth.