Where did all the evolutionist go???

I guess they evolved a brain and figured out they were wrong....or perhaps they are out hunting for intermediate species in the "fossil record"

More likely they figured out this is a useless debate like a couple blind people arguing over the color of the car that just hit them....it doesn't matter.
Neither side can be proven right.
Evidence just does not exist to prove evolution as a fact of science by scientific methods. The same goes for religious beliefs.
Where the biblical argument wins out though is because it is faith based and does not necessarily need to be proven.
Evolution is science based and does need to be proven.
Till that time kids have fun with a no win situation

Originally posted by BUYthepeopleFOREthepeople
Where did all the evolutionist go???

I guess they evolved a brain and figured out they were wrong....or perhaps they are out hunting for intermediate species in the "fossil record"

More likely they figured out this is a useless debate like a couple blind people arguing over the color of the car that just hit them....it doesn't matter.
Neither side can be proven right.
Evidence just does not exist to prove evolution as a fact of science by scientific methods. The same goes for religious beliefs.
Where the biblical argument wins out though is because it is faith based and does not necessarily need to be proven.
Evolution is science based and does need to be proven.
Till that time kids have fun with a no win situation

Or perhaps they all went to bed? Don't worry, they will come back full force. Do not think you have won.
I'm still here but I usually watch the debate, helping "evolutionists" here and there.
Just to clarify a few things out:
Gravity is a fact. Gravity Theory and General Relativity are theories to explain the fact.
Evolution is a fact. Evolution theory that explain the evolution.

Originally posted by BUYthepeopleFOREthepeople
It's not my theory....it's yours and I just used it against you.
I used the "evolutionary time line" of frogs to show how little your friend knows about his own theory.
Sorry you lose, thank you come again.
The "it just needs more time for macroevolution" time line just keeps getting shorter and shorter.
Its not looking good for you and yours.

I see you still are too much of a coward to respond to my posts, and instead are rambling on about how little someone knows about his own theory (irony!).

Everyone can see your ignorance and your total lack of any coherent, logical argument. At this point we might as well be arguing with a brick wall.

[edit on 26-9-2008 by SamuraiDrifter]

Originally posted by BUYthepeopleFOREthepeople
I used the "evolutionary time line" of frogs to show how little your friend knows about his own theory.

We weren't talking about the actual evolution of frogs! You postulated the idea of frogs evolving into man (this is stupidity on your part), and I gave you a time frame for that kind of change, not meaning how long frogs became frogs.

So stop taking my words out of context!


I also tore up your plagiarism, I don't see you taking that on though, no all you can do take my completely unrelated statements completely out of context. Some arguer you are.

[edit on 9/26/2008 by Good Wolf]

as soon as code is found such as dna any natural cause can be ruled out.......For information to originate from a non intelligent source or randomly has never been observed anywhere in the universe,luckily for evolution it only deals with change and not origin,,,,,,people argue that we share dna with animals but every creature on earth was created by god from earthly materials,,,,,,so naturally we would share some dna,,,,the big problem for evolution is the proof of complex info being stamped into each dna strand by non intelligent source and nothing creating something ,,,,,,,,,,is a big hurdle for evolution to survive in our modern world.......... since the finding of dna as the building blocks of life and coded with information,,,,,,,,it clearly points too intelligent design,,,,,without the beavers dna incoded to build a complex damm,,,,,,no workshop needed,,,,,,its hard to argue this ability to evolution and a fluke of nature,,,,,,,,this shows a very complex and intelligent trait.......stamped by god on the beavers dna,,,,,,,to say evolution was responsible,,,,,,,would be like throwing notes randomly on a peice of paper and having a masterpiece appear,,,,,,thats how complex the dam design is in nature,,,,,information to be considered info must have a intelligent origin,,,,,or its just noise kinda like space noise,,,

Since we discovered the possibility that evolution is going on should christians not also believe that it is part of God's plan?
I come from a varied religious background heavily influenced by christian and pagan beliefs. Several times I've had discussions with religious leaders of various groups about this topic. This is my idea;
If you believe that God created everything and He rested on the seventh day (however you interpret that) what did God do after that? Stop? I don't think so and see no reason to believe otherwise. I believe that God continues to create and that is evolution, evidence of God being active in creation to this date. Why not? On a lighter note to my fellow religious leaders I added; since when does a man ever create something in his workshop and NOT continue to tinker with it? :-)