posted on Nov, 13 2008 @ 02:10 AM
Originally posted by easynow
first of all i am not here to defend anything about this case and with me having a neutral stance about it, speculating my theory's about why these
events occurred the way they did are only guesses and won't prove anything just like your speculation and guesses.
If you're not defending the case, why do you dismis possible explanations criticising Meier's actions? That's not being neutral. And as Aspie
already pointed out you have a tendency to attack and ridicule those who have a negative opinion of Meier. That happend many times in thread. As Aspie
also pointed out you dismissed Derek's website but pointed out Horn's and Deardorff's as a reasonable source. Neutral means that you don't take
sides. Your contributions in this thread indicate otherwise. I think you have to be careful here Easynow, some people don't see you as 'neutral'
and some might even begin to think you're liar as well.
i will say that i surely want to know the truth but both sides enforcing their conjecture based agenda's will amount to zero in the end.
Searching for the truth means you have to question the knowledge. Test the claims that are being made. Investigate, verify, corroborate. It's lenghty
and difficult process, especially in the world of ufology.
You make it sound like I have an agenda which fell out of thin air. Let me tell you something Easynow, my "agenda" or point of view on Meier evolved
over a decade or so. That's right, I've been reading up on him for many years. At first I even saw him in a positive way but over time after reading
much information that changed to the negative. I can explain my motivation in great detail. Can you?
so ,unless some damning or affirmative new evidence is presented about the story line there is really no point to keep going at each other with these
guesses but if you think something conclusive can come from that then i will keep considering yours and others, conjecture based viewpoints. and the
answer to your accusation that i have not offered an explanation of why the photo developer's name was never released is unjustly because the
speculative answer is in my last post to you
You know Easynow, I've 'been around the block' with these discussion forums and sometimes it's easy to see what kind of reasoning or strategy the
other poster uses. I see posts as thoughts - thought-patterns someone sends out. If you look closely enough you can always see what someone is doing.
You can see a person lure people into a debate, evade hard questions, blame other posters to various degrees while washing their hands in innocence.
People often if not always leave a trace of their actions. Those actions show what these people are all about...
and just to be clear on this i am not ruling out your side of this discussion at all.
I hope you realise that there's a major difference between 'talking the talk' and 'walking the walk'.