posted on Nov, 11 2008 @ 02:59 AM
reply to post by skeptic1
The shroud input is fine, but it ignores the evidences pointing to it being the real image of Christ.
There is a napkin that matches the shroud face in Spain that came from Christ, also.
There is no mention of the plastic-forming bacteria that has coated the shroud fibers, either, changing the date of the shroud.
The studies of the pollens and images on the shroud of specific plants only found in and around Jerusalem are not mentioned.