Anonymous Hack's Palin's Yahoo Email, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 03:48 PM by d11_m_na_c05
reply to post by nyk537


Privacy ? You mean i cant look at her email but she can watch mine? Hmmmm

We lost that "right" why do i care if she has it ? Heck every email sent in the last few years is sitting on a server somewhere to be used against me if needed .

Privacy....humph Not so fun now that the shoe is on the other foot eh?



reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 03:49 PM by nyk537
reply to post by d11_m_na_c05


I'd like to see some evidence that Sarah Palin is watching your email account please.

I'd also like to see some proof that all of your emails are sitting on a server somewhere waiting to be used against you.

I'll wait....


reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 03:50 PM by Blaine91555
reply to post by d11_m_na_c05


I'm not buying it. If I broke into your house you would be pissed off. You might even shoot me.

Yes government documents should be an open book. No, private emails should not. These were private email accounts, not .gov accounts.


reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 03:52 PM by Blaine91555
reply to post by ATruGod


I know one thing. You are going to get this thread closed. There are other sites for gossip and smear campaigns.



reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 03:55 PM by shipovfools
Originally posted by nyk537
reply to post by d11_m_na_c05

These were her personal email accounts. These were not official government accounts. They contained personal information and pictures.


I think the concern is that she was using a personal account to conduct government business, hence avoiding the kind of transparency and accountability which one would expect. But since the Wikileaks page doesn't give us the full text of all her email correspondence, we can't say for sure - maybe it was purely personal. I'm not sure what kind of regulations exist for government email accounts but I believe all messages would be archived for a lengthy period of time.

As for the whole partisan issue, I'm fine with the mudslinging on either side of the aisle because I don't believe you can be a serious candidate for any high-level office without having already "sold out" to interests hostile to the general public and the ideals of freedom. I'll be happy to see anyone bringin' down Obama, Biden, McCain or Palin...now there is a veritable ship full of fools!


reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 03:56 PM by ATruGod
reply to post by Blaine91555


So I am not allowed an opinion? Thats all it was.

No really how in the heck is my opinion going to get this thread closed?


reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 03:57 PM by Blaine91555
reply to post by Harvestfreak


To all the Anons:

May you be caught soon and prosecuted. Get a job. Get a life.

To the underage Anons:

Slap your Parents for not raising you better


reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 04:00 PM by shipovfools
Originally posted by ATruGod
reply to post by Blaine91555


So I am not allowed an opinion? Thats all it was.

No really how in the heck is my opinion going to get this thread closed?


I honestly don't know! The point you raise is exactly what the Wikileaks page mentioned...that this is a concern not because it was a "personal" account but because she was using it to avoid the transparency that comes from using the official government email accounts. Granted it may be mostly speculation, but given the facts, justified to some extent....even if politically motivated, your comments did not constitute a smear attack IMO.

Just to clarify...I didn't start this thread with any intention of Palin bashing. As I said in my last post, I don't care for any Repugnantcan any more than the Democrap. I just thought this was a rather interesting story.

Apparently Max Headroom pwns Palin (see the other post about the latest Anon vid )


reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 04:05 PM by Sublime620
reply to post by nyk537


I never made it partisan, you did - which is why I am a little confused over that decision. Let me explain:

1) Why would the media saying, "Palin's account hacked" backfire on the Obama?

2) Anyone who watches the news (conservative news especially) knows that saying anything to do with Palin will "backfire" on Obama. It's a glorified buzzword.

3) Nothing happened. Someone did something illegal and you discussed how it's going to hurt Obama.

You turned it from a hacker into Palin v Obama. That's all I was responding to.

*Edit:

Example: Google search on "Palin Backfire"

Google

But hey, they can censor me all they want. I don't mudsling, never have, never will. I advocate against it, which is why I had to call you out on your buzzword "backfire".

[edit on 17-9-2008 by Sublime620]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^