It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ufo video, thoughts?

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 07:45 PM
link   
ive seen one or two ufos in my time with my naked eye...even caught one on camra, this to me looks like the video is not fake.. but it looks like a remote controlled plane with a neon hula hoop attached to it. I may be wrong... I hope I am . But it looks nothing like what i have seen.

In short a small a sun like object/ ball of fire, so i must remain skeptical.

hope it is the boys coming back to town thou.

do you get the feeling we need help right now?

I do.

love stef x




posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 08:25 PM
link   
I am an Avid RC collector...and I have had a few helicopters. Both battery and Nitro powered heli's have NEVER been able to hold a charge and/or have enough fuel to last 2 minutes...nevermind 5 + minutes of air time. Now...we only see 5 minutes of video...now factor in take off and altitude climb time, we are now looking at approximately 6 minutes and 30 seconds of flight time...far surpassing the 2-3(max) minutes of a normal flight time.

Now..it is possible that this "toy" is laden with extra batteries and or a large fuel tank...but with a larger vehicle...we lose fast aerobatics in flight. I would love to see a 747 do some stuff like that.

Just my 2 cents.

B/T/W...love the video, hate ignorant skeptics.




posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 09:41 PM
link   
NEVER been able to run a heli for 2 minutes, let alone 5? What kind of crap rc equipment are you running?



posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 10:16 PM
link   
This is one of the better videos I've seen on ATS for quite some time.

really good find!

The camera man isn't being hysterical and over reacting, he seems amazed and awe struck, much like I would be If i saw it.

He gave some really amazing reference points and when I saw the object go behind that house and then back up in the air I was sold.

I would say that not only is this some great footage worthy of attention from more knowledgeable minds than myself, it is one of the strangest UFOs I've ever seen on film.

I would debunk the RC helicopter thing for a number of reasons.
The reference points we have from the video would put the object at a HUGE size... I'm talking 747 Plane size...
I've never seen an object that can fly that high from the ground by remote control or move in the ways it does.
Is it possible it is a man made manufactured?
sure...
Do I think it is?

.... Well, if it is, I would start thinking bluebeam...
But I think it ET.

*Edited for grammar

[edit on 17-9-2008 by Odessy]



posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 10:45 PM
link   
reply to post by free_spirit
 


Thank you for saving me the time.

The way they have that site set up it goes automatically to random videos but that link worked.



posted on Sep, 18 2008 @ 07:56 AM
link   
i have video and pics just like that and i believe 100% thats real ..but?????.. real what? what is it? that is my question and when i filmed and took pics it wasn't dancing around..it almost just looked like a very very bright star but when on film it looked like this to the T . GOOD VID CALM DUDE... GOOD JOB!

later,
"justuserg2"


www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Sep, 18 2008 @ 09:43 AM
link   
Mrr you seem to be taking this personally, I am not debunking YOU I am debunking a hoaxer. Unless you filmed this yourself and powered the rc object you should not be taking this the way you are.


The below images are nearly identical one is from the video and the other is from the video of this hoaxers demonstration.



You are not the first person to think that something explainable was interesting..It has happened to me many times. as I said in another thread.. its no big deal.

[edit on 18-9-2008 by NephraTari]



posted on Sep, 18 2008 @ 12:47 PM
link   
It looks real. You can tell from the up and down of the camera motion. Also people don't realize that the human eye is better at seeing things in the dark, than those video cameras. I can't seem to take a picture with my camera as my eye takes on a full moon night.

Unless its some type of new street light, its the real deal. I have a habit of telling fakes from the real things. Although my art is based on old technology, the digital age is keeping me on my toes. Now I'm not certified, I'm just well practice to tell the fakes from the real.



posted on Sep, 18 2008 @ 01:17 PM
link   
Well i found this.


Thought it is similar.

www.ufoinfo.com...



posted on Sep, 18 2008 @ 01:25 PM
link   
I have one of the above stated XUFO RC toys, and I have to say 1.) It will not go as high as the object in the video due to transmitter restrictions 2.) At only about 20 ft. off the ground it becomes so unstable that it wouldn't even fly as long as the object in the video. This video looks accurate, and if you've ever read any on the propulsion systems of these things, you see that it is in fact very unstable close to the earth. The earth magnetic field is very unstable. This looks legit. Thanks for the post.



posted on Sep, 18 2008 @ 03:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Mrrrr
 


This looks interesting. Does not look like a scale model flier. No noise, and sound seems fine.

Here is the small scale flier to see how flight dynamics would actually be. It was just below the YouTube post too.

www.youtube.com...

The larger one in NephraTari's post would make a terrible racket, and as an airfoil, would need movement constantly to stay aloft. It could not hover.

This bears investigation. I wish the videographer would have reported to NUFORC or Mufon. The video would be analyzed if Mufon was consulted.

ZG





[edit on 9/18/2008 by ZeroGhost]



posted on Sep, 18 2008 @ 05:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mrrrr
Well i found this.


Thought it is similar.

www.ufoinfo.com...




In fact it's different, only the ring shape wich it's completely round at difference of the
RC Model but the mexican UFO was not flying, it was static in the sky with only small
movements like morphing and then dissapeared.

Check the video here.

www.youtube.com...

The difference is the mexican UFO event was real according to the investigation and
the California object was a RC iluminated UFO model as explained and proved.

This is the 2005 thread of the mexican UFO sighting with more information.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Sep, 19 2008 @ 09:14 AM
link   



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join