It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bodrul
without Air support and navel support
destroying everything first and weakening the defending side
the US army isnt all that.
Originally posted by bodrul
if it went one on one
it would be a diffrent ball game
Originally posted by bodrul
also its foolish to compare the Iraqis to Iranians
Originally posted by bodrul
yet they get their asses handed to them on a silver platter by
Iraqi resistance and terrorists in Iraq
and terrorists in Afghanistan
Originally posted by bodrul
yeah right the US armed forces is nothing without first getting full control of the air, sea first
Originally posted by bodrul
unless you state that the US armed forces alone could take on another armed force without having its counter parts in the air force and navy completely causing havoc on the other side first before going in.
Originally posted by bodrul
Modern war fare my right side
Iraq and afganistan has shown that already
Originally posted by bodrul
reply to post by WestPoint23
yeah right the US armed forces is nothing without first getting full control of the air, sea first,
unless you state that the US armed forces alone could take on another armed force without having its counter parts in the air force and navy completely causing havoc on the other side first before going in.
Modern war fare my right side
Iraq and afganistan has shown that already
Originally posted by bodrul
reply to post by theblunttruth
yet they get their asses handed to them on a silver platter by
Iraqi resistance and terrorists in Iraq
and terrorists in Afghanistan
[edit on 18-9-2008 by bodrul]
yet they get their asses handed to them on a silver platter by
Iraqi resistance and terrorists in Iraq
and terrorists in Afghanistan
What does having a dictator proove you won't have a good Army, it's all about training, and good weapon systems.
Originally posted by ANNED
Head to head they were about equal to Saddam's Iraq troops.
And you seen what the US did to the iraqi army.
A country with troops under a dictatorial regime seldom has troops that do good in combat.
Mostly because they have no reason to fight for the regime.
While there may be special units that are good, Most of the countries troop are subpar.
Don't judge the troops of a country by a few special units these would be the first target hit.
When the US went into Iraq the iraqi republican guard units were targeted for elimination first.
You do know that they Taliban is winning, and it's a matter of time before the overrun the U.S. Foces right?
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by bodrul
yeah right the US armed forces is nothing without first getting full control of the air, sea first
This post is comical. Do you know how difficult it is to dominate in every dimension of warfare? And you're faulting the US Armed Forces for being able to do this?
Originally posted by bodrul
unless you state that the US armed forces alone could take on another armed force without having its counter parts in the air force and navy completely causing havoc on the other side first before going in.
First of all the term US Armed Forces is the proper term to describe the US military. So stop misusing it by referring to US ground forces with it. And once again that is a pointless question to ask and one which I will not attempt to answer.
Originally posted by bodrul
Modern war fare my right side
Iraq and afganistan has shown that already
Iraq and Afghanistan has shown that conventional war is the bred and butter of the US military. And as has been known for millennia, occupation and stability are the most difficult aspects of any conflict. In any case, our forces have performed remarkably well. There is no current military power in the world which could do what we have accomplished since after 9/11 to the present day. And you can take that to the bank.
[edit on 18-9-2008 by WestPoint23]