It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Senior officials from the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany will meet here Friday to discuss the Iran nuclear issue, the State Department announced Tuesday.
The six countries will try to find new way to persuade Iran to halt its sensitive nuclear work, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said.
The U.N. nuclear watchdog showed documents and photographs on Tuesday suggesting Iran secretly tried to modify a missile cone to fit a nuclear bomb, diplomats said, and Tehran again dismissed the findings as forged.
Despite the main finding in the latest report from the International Atomic Energy Agency that it "has been able to continue to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran", the western media has focused on the issue of Tehran's lack of transparency over the IAEA investigation into recent intelligence allegations (Report, September 12). These involve missile re-entry vehicle projects and have been rejected by the Iranians, who have not even been permitted to see the documents upon which the allegations are founded.
This week the US Congress is debating two non-binding resolutions which, if passed, will greatly increase the likelihood of military intervention against Iran. They call on the US president to "increase economic, political and diplomatic pressure on Iran to verifiably suspend its nuclear enrichment activities", and demand "stringent inspection requirements" of all goods entering or leaving Iran and an embargo of refined petroleum products to Iran. Although both resolutions exclude authorisation for military action, the embargo will require a naval blockade. Such a blockade could result in skirmishes with the Iranian navy which could rapidly escalate.
The US is massing the largest armada of warships in the Gulf since 2003. Two aircraft carrier task forces are already there and a third was dispatched on August 22. French and British warships and carrier groups are also reportedly on their way. This has increased speculation that George Bush might authorise military attacks against Iran before the end of his term in office in January, or before the November elections to boost to the likelihood of a McCain presidency.
Stefan Simanowitz
Westminster Committee on Iran
TEHRAN, Iran - Iran announced Tuesday that it has put the elite Revolutionary Guards in charge of defending the country's territorial Persian Gulf waters in what appeared to be a hardening of its stance in the vital oil route.
U.S. commanders in the Gulf have in the past said they find Guards ships more confrontational than the regular Iranian navy, which until the new order was responsible for Iranian defenses in the Gulf.
Originally posted by logician magician
An international organization needs to be created that oversees, runs, and monitors all nuclear power plants worldwide.
It could be called the Nuclear World Order.
Originally posted by Reddupo
Originally posted by logician magician
An international organization needs to be created that oversees, runs, and monitors all nuclear power plants worldwide.
It could be called the Nuclear World Order.
Isn't that the IAEA and the UN?
Originally posted by mattifikation
Yes, I too wonder why Israel isn't going to be there. Are they just too good to do their own dirty work? That must be it. Why should Israel get their hands dirty, after all, they're the "chosen ones," right?
I also wonder why Iran won't be there. When you're dealing with people, and talking about the rights of people, you generally don't map out a plan for punishing them until the accused has had the opportunity to present its case.
These meetings are akin to a jury imposing a sentence before hearing the trial.
Originally posted by logician magician
Originally posted by Reddupo
Originally posted by logician magician
An international organization needs to be created that oversees, runs, and monitors all nuclear power plants worldwide.
It could be called the Nuclear World Order.
Isn't that the IAEA and the UN?
They just inspect nuclear facilities. I'm thinking of one that controls and staffs them full time. In other words, the country would pay the UN for energy. If the country screwed up or tried to go to war, they'd just shut off their energy supply.
That's probably why the U.S is trying to control all of the oil anyway....
UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The U.N. General Assembly opened the door on Monday to expanding the Security Council by calling for full-scale negotiations on adding new members to the United Nations' most powerful body.
After hours of talks that several diplomats involved in said nearly collapsed, the assembly unanimously passed a resolution approving "inter-governmental negotiations" on expanding the council to begin by February 28, 2009.
Several U.N. diplomats described the breakthrough as "historic", saying it greatly increased the likelihood that the council will become larger and more representative of the world of the 21st century.
Originally posted by mattifikation
Yes, I too wonder why Israel isn't going to be there. Are they just too good to do their own dirty work? That must be it. Why should Israel get their hands dirty, after all, they're the "chosen ones," right?
I also wonder why Iran won't be there. When you're dealing with people, and talking about the rights of people, you generally don't map out a plan for punishing them until the accused has had the opportunity to present its case.
These meetings are akin to a jury imposing a sentence before hearing the trial.