It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Gov. Sarah Palin wants a state board to review the circumstances surrounding the dismissal of Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan -- taking the unusual step of making an ethics complaint against herself.
...
The lawyer, Thomas Van Flein, also asked the state Legislature to drop its own investigation into the Monegan matter. He says the Personnel Board has jurisdiction over ethics.
A senator running the investigation immediately refused.
Originally posted by DCFusion
What I don't get is if Palin is truly innocent of any wrong doing, why is she not pushing this investigation through herself.
It would also make the Dems look bad for sloshing this thing around when there really was no grounds for it.
Originally posted by ppskylight
Palin allies sue to halt trooper probe
www.cnn.com
Allies of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin asked a judge Tuesday to halt the state Legislature's investigation into the firing of her public service commissioner
Originally posted by ppskylight
Palin will not be cooperating with the investigation.
Originally posted by ppskylight
I have to agree with commentators on CNN earlier today who had mentioned that this probe is being stalled, prolonging it until after the election is over for the benefit of one candidate.
Originally posted by Keyhole
Sounds to me like the same sort of thing Bush has been doing in the White House.
Aides to Gov. Sarah Palin won't comply with subpoenas issued by state lawmakers investigating the firing of Alaska's former public safety commissioner because Palin "has declined to participate" in the probe, her attorney general says.
...
"As state employees, our clients have taken an oath to uphold the Alaska Constitution, and for that reason, they respect the Legislature's desire to carry out an investigation in support of its lawmaking powers," Attorney General Talis Colberg, a Palin appointee, told the investigation's manager in a letter released Wednesday.
Palin initially denied that anyone in her administration or family had pressed for action against Wooten, whom she has branded a "rogue trooper." But in August, two weeks before her nomination as a vice presidential candidate, she acknowledged that members of her staff had contacted Monegan's office nearly two dozen times about the trooper. An aide was suspended after being taped telling a state trooper lieutenant that the Palins were concerned that there had been "absolutely no action for a year on this issue."
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by mabus325
The Alaskan State constitution, which is the law in Alaska, prohibits this kind of investigation.
Hi, and welcome to my world, confused as usual.
Impeachment and investigation are two entirely separate issues. Obviously you can't instigate impeachment proceedings without first performing some type of investigation. Preferably by a bi-partisan group ( which we appear to have). So, having any type of investigation, which in many cases would be to prove that no wrongs were committed, would seem to be clear legal proceedings.
Also, many legal proceedings are initiated at the request of citizens of that constituency, as is their right under the US Constitution. Policy makers are subservient to the people, not the other way around. Playing legal mumbly-peg just makes them look bad. Can't wait to see how this plays out.
(did I wander off topic? sorry, but I'm still confused.)
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I thought subpoenas were a demand to appear.
subpoena
noun
1. a writ issued by court authority to compel the attendance of a witness at a judicial proceeding; disobedience may be punishable as a contempt of court
subpoena [(suh-pee-nuh)]
An order of a court, a legislature, or a grand jury compelling a witness to be present at a trial or hearing, under penalty of fine or imprisonment. Subpoena is Latin for “under penalty.”