reply to post by Darkpr0
Sorry I got cut off before I could finish the post:
I do agree that the notion of an SU-33 etc, going 2 times the speed of sound a low altitude is nonsence period.
THe aerodynamics alone do not allow this airframe to overcome the friction of the air. The top end for aircraft is always achieved at high altitude
and in a clean configuration for less drag. The record breaking F-15 "Streak Eagles" even went without paint for weight savings.
Also most aircraft's top speed is in a full afterburner dash anyway and they are unable to sustain that speed for extended periods secondary to fuel
consumption. Airframes that could were in effect huge flying fuel tanks like the XB-70 or the SR-71 / A-12
So unless the CBG is sitting 20-30 miles off the cost of Iran its unlikely its going to get that close.
