It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neformore
Those two planes can pack enough nuclear punch to drop 12 military bases between them using cruise missiles while standing off a coastline...
Originally posted by FredT
reply to post by neformore
The only thing that bugs me is the near mythological status some New Soviet weapons systems seem to attian here in discussions.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
However the interception by Norwegian and USAF F-16s, makes me wonder if this aircraft is capable of making a low profile transatlantic flight in a real time operational scenario.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
...although the ability of the subpar hornet to actually intercept is a question mark).
Originally posted by kilcoo316
With regards westpoint's cruise missile argument:
Originally posted by kilcoo316
...but you can be sure it is not a big job to redesign for land attack duties, if variants do not already exist.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
The AS-15 Kent is a subsonic cruise missile capable of terrain following...
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The Superbug would not be concerned with a photo intercept, with proper warning a formation of Hornets on CAP with AIM-120Ds and the backing of SM-6 interceptors will more than suffice.
Yes, aside from that however there is not much else to help this missile avoid intercept. either in mid flight or in the terminal stage. And it is the main long range cruise missile the Tu-160 carries.
Sure there may be unconfirmed reports and speculation regarding missile X or Y but would the entire Tu-160 fleet be fitted with, certified, and ready to go with them tomorrow if need be?
Originally posted by FredT
The only thing that bugs me is the near mythological status some New Soviet weapons systems seem to attian here in discussions.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The Superbug would not be concerned with a photo intercept, with proper warning a formation of Hornets on CAP with AIM-120Ds and the backing of SM-6 interceptors will more than suffice.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
It kind of defeats the purpose to mention random cruise missiles that happen to be supersonic without mentioning their launch platform, missions, current status and range.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
I'm sure hypothetically it's possible for it to hit a stationary land target, but it still does not factor into the discussion.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Yes, aside from that however there is not much else to help this missile avoid intercept. either in mid flight or in the terminal stage. And it is the main long range cruise missile the Tu-160 carries.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Sure there may be unconfirmed reports and speculation regarding missile X or Y but would the entire Tu-160 fleet be fitted with, certified, and ready to go with them tomorrow if need be?
Originally posted by Darkpr0
Is that sort of firepower likely to be over at the poles, an international grey area?
Originally posted by Darkpr0
While an onslaught of massive White Swans is going to be highly visible on radar should they try an over-the-top or even over the ocean route, this is no longer the case.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
The message here is that the birds can get within arm's reach of the North American continent, and thus demonstrates that the amount of warning we'll have is much smaller than we might have anticipated.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
If we're dealing with an assault started by an opposing force, this problem is irrelevant since it will happen on their timetable rather than yours.