It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Child sex ring at the White House

page: 5
14
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 28 2008 @ 05:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Phatcat
 


I have no problem believe that rich politicians can buy silence. Apparently you missed the front page newspaper article I posted referring to this? It was not kept quiet so that part of it is over with.

Secondly, this is not just some rich noname politician. This is the white house. The office of the most powerful man in one of the world's few super powers.

Seriously look at the scale of this. This is the white house, not senator john does summer home. I really do not understand why people keep mentioning government and money buying silence. It was in the paper. We are talking about it now. Apparently this is not the first thread on the subject. Silence was never attained. Unless they are going around and buying off each and every single person I tell one by one, that has nothing to do with it.

I am not asking so much why noone stormed the white house and raided it for kids. I am asking why we can all see this story, we can all read every word of it. It is too late to be silenced. Yet still, noone really cares?

I do not mean to sound combative, it is just that the idea of buying silence is not at all hard to believe. It just seems completely out of whack when discussing a story that was on the front page of the newspaper.




posted on Sep, 28 2008 @ 06:20 PM
link   
reply to post by MorningStar8741
 


You have to remember that judges, attorneys, etc are officers of the court.

They swear an oath to the court, not the people, therefore the people are not their main concern. You also have to understand that the courts are there for the corporations now, they no longer follow the law of the land.

I don't think you're being agruementative, just that you're not really looking at this particular subject with a completely open mind ( sorry, i don't mean to offend you).

I'm also afraid that i'm not a very eloquent speaker and may not be presenting these things to you properly. This is why i have given you the links so that you may read up on these things yourself and follow up with your own research.



posted on Sep, 28 2008 @ 06:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by MorningStar8741
The judicial system does not work in secret laws that magically get left out of court documents.


I'm sorry, but yes they do. They also work under the "color of the law" and people's ignorance of the law.

It's people's ignorance of the laws that are in effect that allow them to get away with what they do.

I don't expect you to take what i'm saying at face value, which is why i have provided links to the threads so that you may read the information on your own and do your own research.

If what i say seems to you to negate the case that i'm making than i'm afraid that is caused by an inability on my part to explain it correctly. Hopefully you will read through the threads and the information will be put forth in a better light than i can manage.



posted on Sep, 28 2008 @ 07:10 PM
link   
I found an interesting article about this topic from one of my subscription library cites I use for work. Sorry about the extended quote--which I know ATS doesn't normally like--but only people who subscribe to the site can see the article.
Source information : Snooping on Allies Embarrasses U.S.by: Timothy W. Maier - author. Magazine Title: Insight on the News. Volume: 13. Issue: 38. Publication Date: October 20, 1997. Page Number: 9+.


Outrageous as it may be to Americans who believe in openness and fair play, this sort of thing has been done regularly by the Clinton team. What is new is that APEC appears to have involved leaking of national-intelligence information for political fundraising. Many embassies of the targeted nations asked if Insight knew who was compromised by the child-sex ring. No senior political leader was involved -- it was "secondary" people, such as assistants to those responsible for cutting trade deals, intelligence sources say. It still is unclear who provided the boys to the dignitaries, but Insight has learned that the alleged sexual activities occurred in rooms at the West Coast Vance Hotel in Seattle.

When Pete Shimondale, the general manager of the hotel, was asked by Insight about the sexual allegations, he responded, "Oh God. I didn't start here until 1994." He said authorities have not been out to question him or review records of hotel guests but declined to comment further.

The boys are believed to have been 15 to 17 years old. As shocking as this may be, some say it's routine. A former Bush economic adviser observes, "The sex? That's done all the time. If a foreign diplomat wants a companion, the State Department provides it. It doesn't matter if it's a man or woman. They have a special fund set up for that." Another former NSC official who requested anonymity says other countries also do it. "I was offered every sexual favor you can imagine. I turned it down all the time. After a while they left me alone and stopped offering me."

Government agencies alleged to be involved in this spying responded to Insight with carefully crafted half-denials and artfully dodged a series of questions with noncommittal answers. Confronted with questions about whether Navel Intelligence purchased or used electronic equipment from private consultants and suppliers for the operation, the first response by Navy spokesman Lt. Joe Walker was, "I don't know." But later Walker insisted, "The Navy was in no way involved in the bugging of hotels or restaurants. We did not purchase equipment."

The FBI, which first declined to comment, insisted after the story broke that "we used no physical surveillance at hotels or restaurants" and "we used no microphones" but repeatedly refused to say whether wire tapping or wireless surveillance took place. And the FBI says information regarding its agents taking kickbacks has been forwarded to the Bureau's national security office for investigation. Pressed to answer whether the FBI is denying that the operation happened, an informed agent replied, "Listen, I don't want to go to jail."

Told about the half-denials and vague responses, Insight's intelligence sources say that was to be expected. "But the bottom line," says a high official in the alleged operation, is this: "The FBI is lying. The FBI was there. Period. They used microphones."


The article continues after this but moves on to other covert operations using FBI surveillance during the Clinton Administration, so the above is the relevant information. If anyone wants the last few paragraphs of the article though i can add it if requested to do so.

[edit on 28/9/2008 by xtradimensions]



posted on Sep, 28 2008 @ 11:07 PM
link   
Going a little further back OT

I read this thread and am equally stunned at the lack of public awareness after reading many of the links and I remembered an incident from when I was living in New York City last year.

Someone a few posts back made excellent reference to the fact that these kids would now be 30's-40's and wandering around muttering about being raped by Reagan. One day on my morning commute to midtown on the A train two homeless guys were talking and one was talking about how there was a group of wealthy business men that would pay him to lure guys from the homeless shelter to a location where they would torture and murder the victim for their own amusement. He said it was really sick what they would do but they paid real well.

You know, I normally would have dismissed those types of stories but the more I thought about it the more plausible it seemed. I mean the homeless are societies invisible people, they could kill as many people as homeless as they want and nobody would every believe the stories of a homeless addict.

I guess my point is people seem to be able to believe there are sick 'lone nut' perverts but cannot accept that this horrid practice could be institutionalized and the scope of it seems too 'out there'.



I also had another thought on the tie in with drugs, organized crime and politicians. I read a book on money laundering where it said often obscure antiques are used to launder money because they can move through customs unnoticed. The average joe at any customs stop wouldn't know a $50 rug from a million dollar person heirloom. The same could be said for kids. The people moving these kids around may be effectively bartering with them. They are using them as human capital. As awful as it sounds these children have a moneytary value once pressed into these rings. If they claim to be traveling with Aunts and Uncles it would be very easy to move them around unlike large sums of cash.



posted on Sep, 29 2008 @ 08:14 AM
link   
I fear these perversions where part of what causes Democracy to fail.

When a guy gets elected, and partakes in these kind of things, he's compromised and has to swing their way or the pictures get released and he's toast.

I'm guessing, much to my dismay, that these kind of practices are rule rather then exception.

As to why they're not still remembered, I have but one explanation.

Media.. they control what most people think about. Not what they think per sé but the topics are all laid out for us. When they want a story buried, all they have to do is omit it from the homepage.

Maybe it being released had a political agenda, maybe the reporter and redactor came to the conclusion they had to rapport this or lose their integrity, and where cut short after it made the papers one day by management?

It can even still bé in the newspaper, on page 32, right next to the obituaries, but people as a whole tend to focus only on the cover, not the book.. sad but true in more then one respect.



posted on Sep, 30 2008 @ 01:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Phatcat
 


I agree with all of that, I really do. I just wish I knew why when I show it to people or tell people about it, they can even pretend to be shocked for a moment before letting it slip away. Surely the media has nothing to do with private conversations, so how did everyone get so brainwashed as to worry about Britney Spears mom's new book, and just let this slide away?



posted on Sep, 30 2008 @ 01:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by MorningStar8741
reply to post by Phatcat
 


I agree with all of that, I really do. I just wish I knew why when I show it to people or tell people about it, they can even pretend to be shocked for a moment before letting it slip away. Surely the media has nothing to do with private conversations, so how did everyone get so brainwashed as to worry about Britney Spears mom's new book, and just let this slide away?



Because people are willfully ignorant, they like being distracted or they’d have to actually do something about a horrid thing that is not currently affecting them—far as they can tell. And sadly many groups that are in the public eye that are trying to tackle the sex slave issues and child sexual abusers in America refuse to even address such topics. They too fear stepping on the toes of the men who put up the red tape, so even the most influential well known groups are of little help to people wanting to expose such atrocities taking place within our government.



posted on Sep, 30 2008 @ 01:15 AM
link   
reply to post by rapinbatsisaltherage
 


Yeah, I guess I was just hoping someone might lie to me and say something with a little more hope to it.

anyway, to CHISE,

I have read that other thread before and I see what you are saying. My point was simply that CPC can come take my kids any time they want and I would have to prove that I deserve them back. That is how I live and most folks I know that have ever given it any thought feel pretty much like they have the right to come take them if something is suspected. So that is why I do not see the need for special wording about birth certificates and marriage liscences to further give them the right that they have already established having anyway. Know what I mean? Either way it is scary though so it really does not matter does it.



posted on Oct, 16 2008 @ 10:05 PM
link   
I'm coming over to this thread, because I didn't know it was here when I posted mine and it is so horrid, all the information is. I can't believe that God will allow it for much longer,
but, at the same time, people wonder how He can send anyone to hell.

I haven't even looked over all the links on these pages(I have most of them!), but, it's enough for me to be (almost) overcome with sadness and anger. Thank God that we still even have ANYONE in our leadership that try to do good and help people, because the evil could be more widespread.
I've read so much tonight that my mind is sort of numb. This thread and the one by sizzle about the missing children.


Remember David and Goliath? That is what this sort of represents!
In the meantime let's pray for these children's lives and for those involved to have a TOTAL change of heart and let them go free and safe. To GIVE their LIVES for one last good thing! Don't hesitate, do it!


MY God is big enough for ANYTHING if we believe it!
That's all I will suggest for now, that and post here.
BTW,
I once knew a woman when I was a teenager with 11 personalities and she told me of satanic abuse and her being a young (13 years old) prostitute. I didn't know what to say to her and I didn't know of any of this. She didn't go into it in detail.



posted on Oct, 17 2008 @ 09:33 AM
link   
You know what?
I think it's appalling that a thread like this only gets a measly 11 FLAGS!


Maybe, people see this thread and go, "They're Bush-bashers."
NO!!! It involves Both democrats and republicans!

Maybe, it's not glamorous enough for some or it's too serious.


You know, when you go in wal-mart and you see the missing children on the wall, does that include 'runaways' from orphanages or foster homes?
Do 'runaways' get that kind of effort outside of their loved ones?

Does anyone here have experience with CPS taking children WITHOUT good cause, that took a long time to resolve or wasn't fixed at all?
Thank God, my only knowledge of DFACS or CPS was for good cause and they got their children back, but, at least one girl was molested. I took care of the four children, when the husband got them back and I was paid by DFACS for their care. The mother had been locking them up without food or toilets while the husband was at work!

[edit on 17-10-2008 by Clearskies]



posted on Oct, 17 2008 @ 10:13 AM
link   
I've never heard of the Reagan administration being involved with anything like this but I have heard rumours concerning George Bush senior and children. David Icke is always going on about it. In fact, he recently told Russell Brand on his radio show about the Bush's involvement with kids.

www.davidicke.com...

If this was ever proven I can't think of a better excuse for bringing Bush to trial.



posted on Oct, 17 2008 @ 08:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Mintwithahole.
 

Well, I don't fully agree with David Ike.
I haven't even read any of his stuff that I know of, but the whole reptilian thing put me off.
Here is a legal blog about the Alish Owens case. It's from September!
It says that Wadman fathered Alisha's child and then he sued the CHILD for reimbursement on the paternity test!
You know the woman Alisha Owens who got convicted for perjury and got 5-15 years in jail. In Conspiracy Of Silence, it said she was put in solitary confinement for an unprecedented 3 years or something, a first in Nebraska for a woman!
Is that right?


[edit on 17-10-2008 by Clearskies]



posted on Oct, 17 2008 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Here's a realtime amber alert site.
Operation Find a Child
Here's the website by Noreen Gosch, Johnny Gosch's mother.
The Johnny Gosch Foundation.
That woman is heroic!

Here's a Myspace page dedicated to finding missing people internationally.
Here
Friend them!


[edit on 17-10-2008 by Clearskies]



posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 06:30 AM
link   
Well CS yes i finally read it and to be honest this is no suprise considering most of DC is covered in satanic symbols and monuments. I think I heard about the Cathy Obrien case where she was molested by Hiliary Clinton but that was a long time ago.

What evil is is it's a complete deprevation of grace which means love. It's replaced by (lust) which infest the soul and so if it's true then those people are literally gievn themselves over to evil.

CS one thing we can look forward too, is that Jesus put goodness in the human soul. Good does exist, justice exist, and so that goodness comes from God and he will not let this go on much longer.

If the prophecies are correct we shall hit WW3 soon, and then antichrist, and then one world government, and then finally we will have Christ come back and bring peace.

Like alot of these people said, everybodies in the dark, they don't know what's going on, they see the surface, yet they are too shallow to actually do some reading and search for the truth, so most of the world will go along with antichrist and most of the world couldn't possible believe the government could actually do such a thing.


This is what we should do. FAST and pray for the government. Pray for their souls. I know when I was younger my grandma prayed for me and I was ruthless. I changed around and found love because of prayer and jesus.

you know that. So you never know how much prayer can help these souls and maybee if enough people fast and pray for the gov. they could possibly change around.

Evil makes me sick as hell. But there isn't much you can do about it except pray.

Pray beyond measure.



posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by JesusisTruth
 


Right Jesusistruth! Thanks!
Prayer is most important! Then action!
That link to Noreen Gosch's webpage and the other ones have pictures of missing children, who need to be found!



posted on Oct, 20 2008 @ 01:11 AM
link   
This clip shows a guy,state representative James Fagin(sp) a trial lawyer, on the House floor
saying that if his client was accused of molestation, that he would destroy that child that ACCUSED him!
What really makes it worse, is that he was against Jessica's Law.
DISGUSTING that he uses OUR GOVERNMENT as a advertisement for despicable legal defense!


WHAT would JUSTIFY his attempt to DESTROY a 6 year old?





[edit on 20-10-2008 by Clearskies]



posted on Oct, 21 2008 @ 12:36 AM
link   
I've never seen this before.
Inside Bohemian Club. shaky graphics, but you have to admit this guy has got guts!



posted on Oct, 21 2008 @ 11:34 AM
link   
Just bumping this thread,
trying to spur discussion.
Here's the documentary, Sex Crimes and The Vatican;

Father Flanagan founded Boy's Town, where a lot of allegations came from in the Franklin case and others.

Google Video Link





[edit on 21-10-2008 by Clearskies]



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join