I have reached the conclusion that if Generals could see themselves as performing a blood sacrifice, they'd be far more agreeable to their job, IE hungry for war, and therefore hungry for victory (ongoing war).

I am saying the any General, regardless of denomination, can be convinced that his God wants to win, and that the price of victory, is blood, shed. It seems that war was actually aligned along these principles in "ye olde days" when soldier's job was to stand fast and take a bullet in the face.

I think the best Generals are the ones who are aware of what Rudolph Steiner called the "Occult Value of Blood". Blood really is very interesting, as he points out. It is the bodily elixer which transmutes bodily poison in the form of carbon dioxide out of the body and brings life giving oxygen into the body. I think death on an altar can be described a bit more abstractly, and that "in country" can become "on the altar".

Perhaps the next technology is to add religion into the highest echelons of the military in a ritualistic fashion so as to encourage a more aware perspective of the value of the blood in the veins of those troops under command.

Perhaps one very powerful and occult-aware general might see that to burn victims in a nuclear oven, would be similar to any other priest performing a burnt offering? Perhaps such a General could see nuclear fire as the ultimate offering to his God? Not a Christian/Muslim/Jew of course because THEIR god values life I guess, but some old Roman/Germanic/Pagan gods don't really value life and that pantheon is A: still secretly observed I think, and B: powerful in regards to war-making as Hitler proved.

By the way, did the Nazi's lose WW2? Weird how the whole thing just exists today as a stupid skinhead shadow of its 1939-1945 glory, eh? Surely none of Hitler's Generals felt they were purposefully sacrificing young men to Ares God of War, or Eulogia or some other Pagan/Germanic/Cultic god, of that I am certain. ...I think. Wait, now that I think of it, their most amazingly huge rituals were about dead soldiers... Hmm...

I think the General of the future, is aware of the veil between life and death, and I think such a person might even have the audacity/"clarity of vision" to make large sacrifices to his God. Therefore, this would be a better General, one who is determined, like Cain of bible fame, to win at all costs, so to speak?


smallpeeps

Hello and welcome back...(saw your other post...your right).

Very interesting thought. I've often wondered about this as I understand that true priests are laymen, most of the time not even realizing that's what they are, but this throws a new aspect, I haven't thought of. Thanks for your light...

I could easily see how this could be and to add to you, I believe many are officiating this post knowingly already, after all, God takes the first born of Egypt=Emitzraim=Mariamne=A meri ca...to die for country.

Good post and again greetings on your return....young grasshopper....lol...like your avy

Peace

I could easily see how this could be and to add to you, I believe many are officiating this post knowingly already, after all, God takes the first born of Egypt=Emitzraim=Mariamne=A meri ca...to die for country.

Yes so very true, and thanks for being aware of truth.

Yes, it is the tomb of the dead soldier which Germany worshipped under the National Socialists. Seems pretty obvious that this is just like any other child-searing altar of Moloch or whomever.

I think Generals are interesting characters. I mean, they know their men will die, and probably, the best general is the one who likes it that way --Though he may have to "upgrade" his mindset to become a "General of the Next Age" in which global control is paramount and body-counts are not as high.

The General of tommorrow would surely have to be aware of Ritualistic death and the idea that one person killed in a voluntary ritual, has more value than indiscriminate or low-tech killing.

I seem to recall that Michael Aquino was head of the OTO, which if you research their rituals, are very much built upon gay sex and the principle of the weaker and younger males being indoctrinated in the truest, deepest way possible, lol.

I guess "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" can take on a whole 'nother meaning on the sex/blood ritual level.

All I am wondering is about the "technology" of the General of tommorrow. If this were a video game like "Age of Empires" or something, I am saying there'd be an upgrade in the game from "General Commander" to "Occult Commander" and that it would come with a plus-3 modifier for victory because such a leader would see himself on a mission from God.

Or maybe Generals are just tools of the system? On whose doorstep do we lay the dead bodies from warfare, innocent or sacrificial victims? Seems like the Generals just pass the buck to the Chaplains or whatnot, but what if the two positions were to be merged?

[edit on 16-9-2008 by smallpeeps]

Interesting premise. According to the book "Twisted Cross", Hitler viewed the death of his own soldiers as well as the enemy soldiers as a blood sacrifice to his god. It is believed that Hitler himself was possessed by a particularly powerful demon.

I have friends who have protested outside abortion clinics. They report that often satanists show up as a counterprotest, saying that they view every abortion as a blood sacrifice to the devil.

You know that sorta ties in with some other stuff I have been looking into.



Can you all post as much research/links up as possible

Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand

Hello 7T
What is personified evil? Personal Evil or Evil with Personality? Do you mean "cult" figures of personality that are evil? What is evil since perspective is the scope for judgment? What is evil to you might not be evil to them, they,those....Sorry Confused...Peace

Good question. What I meant is that the idea that a person can be evil. Moreover in this case a person can actually be so morally compromised that they under the control or heavy influence of demonic agents.

Originally posted by KOGDOG
This is the hidden history of the human species. It is the basis for all of the sacrifices in the Bible. Adam and Even ate the "Forbidden Fruit". The FF was the "God Child". Jesus referred to the "First Sin" when He said...
He that eats my flesh, and drinks my blood, dwells in me, and I in him.
You sheeple better wake up. This is no joke. The Occult practicing leaders of this world know & practice this ancient ritual. Baaa.... baaaa.... baaaa... sheeple.

That's interesting KOGDOG, but I think the Adam and Eve story is multi-levelled. I do not think it was all about cannabilistic acts.

One thing many people do not know, is that US war makers (Generals) partnered with the enemies of the Comanche tribe, and that these indians were cannibals, apparently. Team up with the cannabils might involve munching some rump roast, lol...You know like that Far Side cartoon where the scientists dressed in ape-suits are being confronted by real apes with grubs and saying "We want to see you chug 'em" ...To gain the enemy of my enemy, would you eat baby parts? Hey, I suppose it depends on your desire to gain victory over the enemy. ...What Would Jesus Dig? Is what I usually ask myself in these conumdrums.

Well, Jesus dug rituals. Whatever and whomever he was, he was reconginized as being of kingly title to something as described in his entry to Jerusalem. But was he strategically foolish with such actions? Jesus dug sticking it to The Man (Rome), while also giving The Man (Rome) his due, as evidenced by his comment, "Render unto Caesar, what is Caesar's". Or in modern parlance, "Give the C-zar/President Whatever he says is his." I do not recall Jesus commenting on the use of smart bombs in industrially militaristic zones which have hospitals in them also. But hey, such is the requirements of todays General --Who surely is one step from being a king, one could assume. Even half a dozen nukes in the hands of a Napoleanic wardork could make him king, and I think some Generals must know that.

Now in regards to the last supper, I do not think Jesus was here initiating a cannibalistic ritual, so you'll have to explain that one to me.

But yes, I do believe there are people who do gather, and eat the parts of humans, and bond themselves in this way.

I think what happened with the last supper was this: Jesus sat his disciples down and said this:

"Okay now look, you may not know this, but cannablism is a very powerful way for people to bond." Surely some of the disciples present would be shocked to hear such a thing, others, not-so-shocked. Then he continued, "Yes in fact even some of those who called Jethro "Father" did sacrifice their little children to the lava-gods and feast on the flesh thereby. These ones Moses tried to placate, as they had done this for centuries and did not know how to leave the memory of their blessed little babies, which they had slain and eaten, when they were new to the beliefs of their fathers. To unite them all, Moses needed to give them the blood they valued so much, and in this way, the era of the Bull ended and the era of the Ram was breeched, for the Bull fell unto the knife as from the position of a god. And Moses gave them the code by which they would shed blood, and it was to align their souls toward a fond memory of their little babies --the first of their flocks, which they had given unto the lava god."

...and the disciples sat there stunned, and Jesus continued "Now that I have told you this truth, and ye quake within your hearts, I say unto you, it is ended on this day, where I assemble with you, my disciples. Can ye imagine giving the best of thine flock to god who asks it when ye have just begun bearing children? Imagine ye the grief of giving up a child, years which have been spent longing for? Think ye upon this as I pass you these next items. Think ye upon what it means, to give thy ounces of blood contained within the body of thy tiny, beloved child, unto thy god. Ponder now, the wisdom of Moses and his law, which I have explained to you, and fulfilled."

So I believe that Jesus understood many things, and that flesh and the consumption of it was one of those things he understood, and that the "Last Supper" was symbolic of these things, and the truths of the past, which placed him into power, though he did not take hold of that power, presumably.

Generals and Chaplains might be fine, but to combine the two is like creating a queen on the chessboard. So many more moves are open.

But how much did Jesus and his presumed ancestor, Moses, value Generals or Chaplains?


smallpeeps

Cain Able....Khanhabil....You are fruit of the spirit and eaten alive....you are devoured behind your eyes gaze. Have you never wondered what sustains "eternal life"?

[edit on 18-9-2008 by letthereaderunderstand]

While I understand what you're getting at, I think its a little shallow to include blood-sacrifices and Occult philosophy together.

Only a small portion of what is considered extremist and/or fanatical Occult practices even debate such topics.