Hubble Finds Unidentified Object in Space, Scientists Puzzled, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 111 times


reply posted on 15-9-2008 @ 08:36 PM by Alter-Ego
reply to post by Ecidemon



Well put, I was thinking the same thing...stared and flaged though because of the sheer peek-a-boo factor. I feel there may be more to this event than we're being told, a little digging is in order.


reply posted on 15-9-2008 @ 08:56 PM by Anonymous ATS




reply posted on 15-9-2008 @ 09:15 PM by reject
reply to post by LostNemesis

Wow! the mother of all unidentified flying objects

Could've been a portal to an impossibly far point in the universe or to another dimension altogether; maybe heaven or hell.

starred


reply posted on 15-9-2008 @ 09:32 PM by kdial1
reply to post by ArMaP




Could be a wormhole that was opened up by an advanced civilization in order to travel to our galaxy. 100 Days..... Move the fleet in.....close it up.

-Kdial1


reply posted on 15-9-2008 @ 10:18 PM by ProfEmeritus
Novas, Supernovas and indeed quasars usually show strong 6563 Angstrom absorption lines. Note however, the paper states:
However, there is no significant H (6563 °A) emission
or absorption, which would be expected for the presence
of strong H and H features. (Although there is
slight evidence for emission at 6563 °A in the Keck spectrum,
this is not seen in the VLT or Subaru spectra

Other anomalies in the absorption lines seem to eliminate virtually every other known phenomena. Therefore, there are two possible explanations, as I see it:
1.) We have encountered a new previously undiscovered phenomena, which may be distinct, or merely a subclass of a known object
2.) At least one of the readings is in error.

I prefer item 1.)
A similar experience happened in 1993:
The second brightest supernova discovered in modern times, SN 1993J, was found in the beautiful spiral galaxy M81 on 28 March 1993. From archival images of this galaxy taken before the explosion, a red supergiant was identified as the mother star in 1993 - only the second time astronomers have actually seen the progenitor of a supernova explosion (the first was SN 1987A, the supernova that exploded in 1987 in our neighbouring galaxy, the Large Magellanic Cloud). Initially rather ordinary, SN 1993J began to puzzle astronomers as its ejecta seemed too rich in the chemical element helium and instead of fading normally it showed a bizarre sharp increase in brightness. The astronomers realised that a normal red supergiant alone could not have given rise to such a weird supernova. It was suggested that the red supergiant orbited a companion star that had shredded its outer layers just before the explosion.

source:
hubble.esa.int...
In that case, it was helium that raised the red flag, that something didn't fit the known repository of information. I suspect a similar revelation as time goes on. After all, this paper is so recent, that there has not been much time for further analysis.


reply posted on 15-9-2008 @ 10:47 PM by TheAgentNineteen
Originally posted by nerbot
Came across this from
SkyandTelescope.com


more in above link....must stop...head hurts...

-----
Mod Edit: Added 'ex' tags
Mod Note: External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 15/9/2008 by Badge01]


LOL, yes that is QUITE a bit of number cramming and jargon tossing. Let me know if you want some help in clarifying any of it. Sometimes you just get people who love to toss around fancy terminology, but it proves little in terms of their actual knowledge.


reply posted on 15-9-2008 @ 10:52 PM by PammyK
reply to post by LostNemesis

Your posts are always great. This one led me to a photo that Hubble made, recently, that stunned me! Thanks for a great post, and the images they are looking at just might be our aliens. Lets hope so.


reply posted on 16-9-2008 @ 12:07 AM by TheAgentNineteen
Originally posted by Grock
i may have missed this in the discussion, but have they said EXACTLY what coordinates this location is? i may have been scanning a little too fast and seem to have missed it.

Great Thread btw


Here are the coordinates as listed in the report:

The transient was discovered in the fourth epoch and is located at (Alpha) = 14h32m27s.395,  (Delta) = +33◦32′24′′.83 (J2000.0), corresponding to galactic coordinates l = 55.528943◦, b = 67.345346◦ and ecliptic coordinates  (Lambda) = 13h24m9s.067,  (Beta) = 45◦21′46′′.06.


Ecliptic Coordinates follow the path of the Sun's orbit as seen from Earth, over the Period of One Solar Year. (Basically tracing its route through the Sky). This is used as the Plane upon which this Coordinate System is based.


(Lambda) Represents Longitude.
(Beta) Represents Latitude.



Galactic Coordinates center on the Sun, and follow a Linear plane extending through the Center of the Milky Way Galaxy. This is done yet again from the perspective here on Earth, and is quite simple, seeing as it follows what you witness in the Night Sky. Picture the Milky Way "Cloud" as seen in a truly dark environment, and how it extends across the sky in a line. That is the Plane for this Coordinate System.


l Represents Longitude.
b Represents Latitude.



The Equatorial Coordinate System is based upon the Earth's Equator. Imagine viewing the Night Sky, and super-imposing the Earth's Equator and North, and South Poles into the Night Sky. Also remember that this is inclined in respect to the Ecliptic Plane, since the Earth has a 23.5 Degree Inclination in regards to such.


(Alpha) Represents Ascension (Longitude).
(Delta) Represents Declination (Latitude).

NOTE: Ascension is technically labeled as: Right Ascension (RA). This follows an Eastward Path emanating at the Vernal Equinox (Where the Sun passes Directly over the Equator in Spring for the Northern Hemisphere, and Fall for the Southern Hemisphere).



As for an "Epoch", it is a term used to reference a set period of time during which the observation was made, and it is a base point from which all future predictions and estimates are calculated. The "Fourth Epoch" is one of Twelve Total during which this "Anomaly" was under observation (Nine of those from the HST (Hubble Space Telescope)). The Date in accordance with the "Fourth Epoch" of this Observation is: 02-21-2006.

J2000.0 represents the date in Julian Years, from which the Observation Based Epoch was measured against, so as to calculate where the Reference Frame will be at any given Future Date.

J2000.0 Represents January 1, 2000, 11:58:55.816 UTC.

The reason for all of these fancy Numerical Systems is so Astronomers can plug them into equations, and thus reach Universal Conclusions (ie, a Worldwide Standard).
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 5 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 26 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 22 member flags
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags