I received this message from an unnamed trustworthy source located deep in the bowels of DARPA.
You state that you received this message from an unnamed trustworthy source, yet if he is unnamed, how do you know that he/she is trustworthy? You
have no clue who it is?
You claim that you are being told by this person that:
The purpose of the LHC is to create a massive energy discharge that will attract any and all alien species within the galaxy to Earth
coordinates. The reason for this project is unknown even by my contact, but it is speculated that the energy display is standard operating procedure
for young civilizations to announce that they are ready for alien contact for purposes of boosting technological evolution.
That is a very bold claim for anyone, even well known scientists, to make. You, who claim to have just been informed of this from some “unnamed”
person, are very quick to begin defending this claim as if it were your own, with your very own claims, as if you are the “specialist” in this
particular claim.
Further on you claim:
We don't "know" to do this procedure, it is inevitable that all intelligent species experiment with the manipulation of energy on larger
and larger scales. Once a critical limit has been reached, those members of the galactic political body have agreed to make contact in one form or
another.
The way you say this, it sounds like you are now the expert on the subject, as if this information is out there as know fact. I assume that this was
also told to you by your “unnamed trustworthy source”.
This whole scenario also contradicts itself quite thoroughly.
… procedure for young civilizations to announce that they are ready for alien contact …
In knowing that this procedure is what is needed to make alien contact, means that an alien contact had to have informed you of said procedure, which
clearly concludes that contact has already been made, and that there is clearly no reason to have to make further contact.
You also pretty much admit that this is not even a claim, but is simply speculation.
… but it is speculated that the energy display is standard operating procedure…
So all in all, there is no proof, and you have already stated that. This whole thread is based purely on
speculation
Until there is proof, and not simply
speculation, I believe you should not be so bold as to make such claims as being fact.
Sincerely,
xmaddness