It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by adrenochrome
wow some brother you've got - i wouldn't keep secrets from my brother... but then again i have no use for power over others, so i'd never be a mason...
So why is that the topic of your thread? You know, the bit of the subject line that reads "My brother is a member of mason society"? You didn't lead off with "My brother teaches a school of occult magick, who wants to know more"... The ties you make with any of this thread to Masonry are tenuous as best, as many have noted. Your brother is a Mason, your brother teaches magick. These two don't necessarily have any bearing on each other. And there are plenty of people on ATS who are interested in magick, and there are plenty of Masons on ATS too. And even a handful of Masons on ATS who are interested in magick. But you still haven't given us any meat.
Originally posted by Occult_Science
As I said, I know no details about his masonic activities (by which i mean social and political activities of secret society in which he is a member) except for his regularly advising presidents of several countries.
"The major function of secrecy in Washington is to keep the U.S. people and U.S. Congress from knowing what the nation's leaders are doing. Secrecy is power. Secrecy is license. Secrecy covers up mistakes. Secrecy covers up corruption."
John Stockwell
-former CIA agent
On the second part, secrecy is only a problem if the substance of the secrets is bad. You hold secrets - if you'd like to claim otherwise, immediately post your social security number and credit card numbers along with your full name and address. What, you won't? AH HA! Your keeping secrets, and that must mean you are using it to gain power!
Originally posted by adrenochrome
...and Hitler waged war against freemasonry because he wouldn't bow to the will of the higher-up masons wanting to control him, so he then foolishly thought he could start killing freemasons to make a point. boy was he a stupid puppet who became drunk with power...
...otherwise, what reason does your lodge give you for Hitler attacking the freemasons?
My lodge doesn't give any reason for Hitler to hate Freemasons. Mein Kampf does shed some light, though... Because Freemasonry is tolerant of many religions, Hitler mistakenly assumed it was under the control of the Jews.
Originally posted by adrenochrome
...and Hitler waged war against freemasonry because he wouldn't bow to the will of the higher-up masons wanting to control him, so he then foolishly thought he could start killing freemasons to make a point. boy was he a stupid puppet who became drunk with power... otherwise, what reason does your lodge give you for Hitler attacking the freemasons?
To strengthen his (the Jew's) political position he tries to tear down theracial and civil barriers which for a time continue to restrain him at every step. To this end he fights with all the tenacity innate in him for religious tolerance-and in Freemasonry, which has succumbed to him completely, he has an excellent instrument with which to fight for his aims and put them across. The governing circles and the higher strata of the political and economic bourgeoisie are brought into his nets by the strings of Freemasonry,and never need to suspect what is happening
Only the deeper and broader strata of the people as such, or rather that class which is beginning to wake up and fight for its rights and freedom, cannot yet be sufficiently taken in by these methods. But this is more necessary than anything else; for the Jew feels that the possibility of his rising to a dominant role exists only if there is someone ahead of him to clear the way; and this someone he thinks he can recognize in the bourgeoisie, in their broadest strata in fact. The glovemakers and linenweavers, however, cannot be caught in the fine net of Freemasonry; no, for them coarser but no less drastic means must be employed. Thus Freemasonry is joined by a second weapon in the service of the Jews: the press. With all his perseverance and dexterity he seizes possession of it. With it he slowly begins to grip and ensnare, to guide and to push all public life, since he is in a position to create and direct that power which, under the name of 'public opinion,' IS better known today than a few decades ago.
...
The general pacifistic paralysis of the national instinct of self preservation begun by Freemasonry in the circles of the so-called intelligentsia is transmitted to the broad masses and above all to the bourgeoisie by the activity of the big papers which today are always Jewish. Added to these two weapons of disintegration comes a third and by far the most terrible, the organization of brute force. As a shock and storm troop, Marxism is intended to finish off what the preparatory softening up with the first two weapons has made ripe for collapse.
Mein Kampf, ch 11
Mein Kampf was edited by Jesuit Father Staempfle
All he had to do then was to develop the NSDAP, to promote subservient, ambitious, megalomaniac, ready-to-all servants, like Goebbels, Goering, Heydrich, Himmler and Hess, and mutate Hitlerian pseudo-philosophy into Nazism out a slight of hand. Then to the suggestion of Gregor Strasser he decided to put all this glibish talk into a book that he pompuously titled "Mein Kampf" (My Fight) whose original version was a collection of rambling, almost incoherent expressions of political commonplaces : there were passages taken from Houston Chamberlain and Lagarde, men whom Dietrich Eckhart used to quote in his writing and conversations. It was so poor and ridiculous that it had to be completely edited by a religious named Father Staempfle, a priest of brilliant intellectual attainment who twice rewrote it for Hitler, making it readable and coherent. Father Staempfle was murdered on the "Night of the Long Knives".
"Mein Kampf" was ghost-written by a Jesuit priest named Father Staempfle. Hitler the dunce was the tool of much more cunning men... Hitler had only one talent: he was a good public speaker and knew how to harangue the masses. As the son of a Civil Servant, Hitler could have obtained a good job in Vienna had he been inclined to work.
Originally posted by adrenochrome
well it's getting late, so i'll explain more later for those too closed-minded to do the research on their own, but do the Crusades ring a bell???
Originally posted by adrenochrome
and please, spare me the stereotype of some young, ignorant know-it-all - i'm just a truth-seeker researching his way through all the dirt and rubbish; i have nothing against normal, every-day freemasons - just secrecy.
cool thanks for proving my point! i sure am using those items as a means for advancing personal power - without them and the secrets they hold, i would be powerless in this corporate system i'm forced to live in! ...no thanks to you material freemasons...
Originally posted by adrenochrome
it's doubtful that those are even his own words... Father Staempfle, a Jesuit, was responsible for most of Mein Kampf.
There is nothing BUT normal, every-day freemasons. There is no other type.