It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by italianfreelancer74
And about my former category in Italy, at least I did somenthing in the past: as correspondent during a press conference I talked to former premier M. Gorbachev, and I asked him about his conversations with R. Reagan about a possible alien threat to mankind.
Did you the same as reporter in your life?
Originally posted by salvatore
***Translated with GOOGLE***
Dear Friends:
I sense that "MoonWalker1966DELTA" do not lie, I have communicated with him for the first time on April 10, 2008 and told me he is the CMDR of Apollo 19.
After the TLI (TRANS LUNAR INJECTION) a stroke of a meteorite wrong failure of telemetry, and the BACKUP just another flight of APOLLO MISSION, (and I will expose the name of that mission) using the simulator could bring to Earth.
As far as my concerns ... I already know who is Moonwalker1966delta.
I do not expose your identity without written permission from "MoonWalker1966DELTA."
So I support the investigative work of my friend Luca, even if there are details on the videos are not real.
This does not reject APOLLO 20, on the contrary, these people deserve to be Understood and Addressed in their desire to make known Hidden Truths, and I will make public they have my total and absolute support.
Greetings
Salvatore Valentin Carta
Originally posted by rush969
Hello. I´m new to this site and would like to contribute an oppinion. Hope it´s usefull.
The photographs HOAX. Need to say more?
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by kidflash2008
I still have numerous reports and reasons to believe that an unaccounted for shuttle(enterprise) was launched from Vandenberg AFB along a polar orbit to spy on russia and launch early keyhole surveillance satellites. And people say those couldnt have happened either.
Then there are the numerous atolls in the pacific or alaskan bases that can be used for launch and recovery in a pre-google earth world.
Just because it was big doesnt mean it wasn't launched somewhere else.
Originally posted by General_Salazar
For those who seem to have trouble seeing the image, here is the link to to the original from the archive that NASA uses...
www.lpi.usra.edu...
The object is to the right of the double/conjoined craters in the centre and it is very visible.
The only good thing to come out of the Retireafb postings was that he made people aware this thing was here in the first place.
As I said previously all this Reteiredafb / Apollo 20 guff has totally distracted from the one good clear unambiguous piece of evidence of something on the moon, we have seen, other than the usual muddled lumps of rock that are usually presented. I think that was his goal and he has succeeded.
If you do some searching on the web for the "derelict" most of what comes up is a discussion about Retireafb and the consequent dismissal of the original NASA stills as they have now become inextricably linked with his hoax.
So far Retireafb has submitted two visually distinct and conflicting images of what is supposed to be the same object, as can be seen where the CSM footage looks like a a concept maquette for the more elaborate colour flyover material (the second half of which seems to be shot in 3D - as evidenced by the green and red round the edges), there are the various lift-off shots and the "City" and "Mona Lisa", there is no footage of their EVA to the derelict (which should obviously exist if they boarded the derelict). Obviously a lot of time, money and research has gone into the hoax but it distracts from the original and very real NASA stills.
If the NASA stills are faked then questions need to be asked as to why NASA is faking what looks to be artificial constructs on the moon.
We need to stop giving Retireafb any more attention.
Originally posted by rush969
Well Mint. Glad we agree on somethings. But what you say about technology I´d have to disagree. I´m shure that THE MOST ADVANCED technology was put on the APOLO missions. Why? The U.S. was trying to beat the soviets in getting to the moon!! It was an ALL OUT gamble.
What happens is that in hindsight that techno looks really backward. We´ve come a long way, that´s for shure, but as I said, you can bet, THAT was the very frontline on technology at the time.
Saw a couple of the "videos". The one about the "city" is reportedly a HOAX being a copy of an illustration by an artist by the name of Bruce Pennington. I wonder if anyone here could provide a photo of that lunar city by this painter.
What I haven´t seen is the estimated size of the supposed spaceship.
Does anyone have that number? Thanks.
Originally posted by rush969
What I haven´t seen is the estimated size of the supposed spaceship.
Does anyone have that number? Thanks.