Originally posted by ludaChris
Well, be that as it may, why do we allow 9 judge's in Washington to settle all of our great social issues when we should be correcting them in our own states, counties, and communities? I myself am against abortion, pro second amendment, anti-gay marriage, but I have come to a point that I have realized it isn't up to me or you to decide what other people can or can't do, so long as they don't infringe upon anyone else's right to live their lives as they see fit.
This sounds like a strong states' rights position. I am on-board, as long as the court cases on the books now can be undone. Many of the social issues (abortion, marriage, property rights) should go to the states, as they were designed to be. This is Palin's view.
But you are right, she is only a VP choice. But at least there is someone on the ticket that I can support.


