It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I’ve been in Alaska only a week, but I’m already feeling ever so much smarter about Russia. [...]
An Arctic blast of action has swept into the 2008 race, making thinking passé
Two weeks after being thrown onto a national ticket, and moments after being speed-briefed by McCain foreign-policy advisers, our new Napoleon in bunny boots (not the Pamela Anderson kind, but the knock-offs of the U.S. Army Extreme Cold Weather Vapor Barrier Boots) is ready to face down the Russkies and start a land war over Georgia, and, holy cow, what business is it of ours if Israel attacks Iran? [...]
Like W., Sarah has the power of positive unthinking. But now we may want to think about where ignorance and pride and no self-doubt has gotten us. Being quick on the trigger might be good in moose hunting, but in dealing with Putin, a little knowledge might come in handy.
A week ago the question was: Is Sarah Palin qualified to be a heartbeat away from the presidency? The question today: What kind of president would Sarah Palin be?
It’s an urgent matter, because if we’ve learned anything from the G.O.P. convention and its aftermath, it’s that the 2008 edition of John McCain is too weak to serve as America’s chief executive. This unmentionable truth, more than race, is now the real elephant in the room of this election.
No longer able to remember his principles any better than he can distinguish between Sunnis and Shia, McCain stands revealed as a guy who can be easily rolled by anyone who sells him a plan for “victory,” whether in Iraq or in Michigan. A McCain victory on Election Day will usher in a Palin presidency, with McCain serving as a transitional front man, an even weaker Bush to her Cheney.
The ambitious Palin and the ruthless forces she represents know it, too. You can almost see them smacking their lips in anticipation, whether they’re wearing lipstick or not.
Throughout her political career, she has pursued vendettas, fired officials who crossed her and sometimes blurred the line between government and personal grievance, according to a review of public records and interviews with 60 Republican and Democratic legislators and local officials. [...]
Interviews show that Ms. Palin runs an administration that puts a premium on loyalty and secrecy. The governor and her top officials sometimes use personal e-mail accounts for state business;
It is not necessarily clear whether Mr. Palin is helping shape his wife’s agenda or simply advocating for it, nor whether he ever put pressure on lawmakers, but his role has not been the customary one of a governor’s spouse in Alaska.
That has made many people in government uncomfortable and often confused over how to react.
“My colleagues told me he was lobbying for the governor’s position on oil taxes,” State Representative Jay Ramras, a Republican who is chairman of the House judiciary committee, said of one instance last year when he saw Mr. Palin outside the legislative chamber before a key vote. “I think that when the spouse of an elected governor steps away from safe issues that are nonpartisan in nature, that it is bad for the legislative and executive branches, and Todd Palin would not be an exception to that.”
3. www.nytimes.com...
Throughout her political career, she has pursued vendettas, fired officials who crossed her and sometimes blurred the line between government and personal grievance, according to a review of public records and interviews with 60 Republican and Democratic legislators and local officials. [...]
Ohhhhh, watch out! She pursues vendettas!
The governor and her top officials sometimes use personal e-mail accounts for state business;
More compelling evidence that our media has been taken over by Obama fascists ...
Originally posted by '___'eed
Anyways, who cares if there is stuff made up about Palin. Didn't the republican party attack Obama for everything he had and blew stuff up out of proportion...
Both sides suck. When will you understand.
Originally posted by walkinghomer
Unbelievable, Obama has been dragged through the press on almost everything.
Originally posted by walkinghomer
Unbelievable, Obama has been dragged through the press on almost everything. How long was his pastor on tv for? how long did they talk about his wife finally loving America. Did you want Sarah to just get a free pass without the Citizens of the USA know who they are voting for?
I find the article amazing. It is biased but its sole purpose I believe was to dish out the dirt about Palin. So far people think she's a GOD sent but for the first time its coming out. Let truth rain my friend and when truth rains then the people can make an honest decision.
How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to “win”?
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?
Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy
-territorial integrity of Georgia
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
-NATO treaty
-Iranian nuclear threat
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran
-Al Qaeda motivations
-the Bush Doctrine
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]
That is what you seem to be missing here. The media is doing the exact opposite of that now. Instead, they are doing everything they can to play up anything negative about Palin or McCain. Its as if the media has become an extension of the Obama campaign. Maybe you cant see it, because its what you want to see.
Originally posted by loam
reply to post by walkinghomer
Originally posted by walkinghomer
Unbelievable, Obama has been dragged through the press on almost everything.
In other words, *they* did it to him, so it's OK to do it to her.
You demonstrate my point nicely.
Wouldn't the most compelling argument in favor of Obama's message of change be a repudiation of nonsense like these articles? I think you Obama supporters miss the damage this does to support he might otherwise find in the middle.
Not taking the high road and not focusing on the real differences on the issues does NOTHING but promise more of the same.
Congratulations, America.
[edit on 15-9-2008 by loam]
t's not that we're missing it, it's that we don't see ghosts...
They did everything to play up all the BS they "fabricated" about Obama.
In fact they spend weeks on NON issues about Obama.