It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Cynicism may now represent one of the greatest threats to democracy, according to a research project at the London School of Economics.
Findings indicate that people are more cynical about politics than anything else, and that cynicism is a more important factor than distrust when it comes to whether people vote. Those who think politicians are liars will probably continue to vote, whereas those who are contemptuous of them are less likely to do so.
But what if politicians could measure the impact that their buzz words were having on the cynicism levels of different groups? The Syntony Research Team at the LSE is trying to develop a 'Cyndex' - a cynicism index. It would measure the emotional responses of cynics according to their age, race, religion, gender and socio-economic backgrounds - from mild frustration to violent anger.
Samson said the indications were that this was because politicians have a public face, making them more prone to criticism than faceless businessmen. The consequences of such cynicism are vast, the team believes. It can result in people disengaging from politics, turning away from major media, or boycotting products. It could also prompt people to join pressure groups or, in more extreme cases, to resort to direct action or violence. 'This has wide implications in the cohesiveness of society,' said Liasides.
...and love will be the ultimate crime.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by Zepherian
...and love will be the ultimate crime.
Heh, this jumped to mind when I read that...
www.abovetopsecret.com...'
Gotta start somewhere I suppose. :shk:
Originally posted by depth om
The realist will become the terrorist.
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
It is my experience that "cynical" people are more apt to be open to the truth, than "patriotic" individuals. They don't want you to be cynical, because once you get over the "us versus them" attitude in politics, you begin to see it for what it is: A false dichotomy, the hegelian dialect, problem-reaction-solution.
Originally posted by AceWombat04
I've always thought it ironic that often people who are fed up with, saddened by, or outraged by policies with which they disagree because of their own idealism and belief that we can do better (read: the opposite of cynicism) are called cynical. I think there should be a distinction made between the two (the frustrated idealist and the cynic,) but all too often, there isn't.
[edit on 9/15/2008 by AceWombat04]
Originally posted by Maxmars
reply to post by jsobecky
You are, of course, entitled to that opinion, but I disagree.
Cynicism is an expression of emotion.
Originally posted by Maxmars
To equate fatalism with cynicism is truly cynical.
Originally posted by Maxmars
The 'us v. them' mentality is not exclusive of cynics. In fact, it seems prevalent in all schools of thought. Including your own. That doesn't make it cynical. It makes it ironic.
'But our most important finding suggested that people who did not vote were more likely to be cynical about the government than distrusting,' said Samson. 'Usually, people focus on distrust, or lack of confidence, as the most important factor when it comes to disengagement. But in fact, it is cynicism.'