It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by lee anoma
Murder?
Not sure what problem you have with that use of the term. We kill them against their will. You can talk food-chain that is fine. But it's still murder. I am not even trying to say it's immoral in a general sense, but it's still murder. They are being killed against their will. How do you define murder?
n.
1. The unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice.
v., -dered, -der·ing, -ders.
v.tr.
1. To kill (another human) unlawfully.
2. To kill brutally or inhumanly.
To kill brutally or inhumanly.
Originally posted by lee anoma
If animals are killed in a humane fashion by humans for the purpose of consumption it isn't considered unlawful or murder.
By your definition eating vegetables is murder unless the plants have consented to your consumption of them.
Originally posted by lee anoma
By extension that would make anyone that eats vegetables a murderer unless they can be absolutely positive no animal or insect died during the cultivation and harvest.
So what then do we eat with "clean" hands?
- Lee
-Well planned vegetarian diets, particularly those including milk and/or eggs, can provide all essential nutrients for good health and for a high level of sports performance.
-Indeed, in one recent study of resistance training in older males, omnivores had a bigger gain in muscle mass than vegetarians.
-More research is required!
Well, in comparing an omnivorous diet (meat containing) with a vegetarian diet, Campbell et al (1995, 1999) demonstrated that strength gains and body composition improvements are impaired when meat is removed from the diet.
In their studies, subjects weight trained for twelve weeks while consuming a 2300kcal diet consisting of 70-90gP (12-15%), 267-317gC (49%), and 82-87gF (7-11%). The only difference between groups was the fact that one group ate a meat-free diet while the other group ate meat. At the end of the twelve weeks, the meat eaters lost 2.8lbs of fat while gaining 3.74lbs of lean tissue. The vegetarians, on the other hand, lost no fat weight and lost 1.76lbs of lean tissue. Bottom line, meat seems to be an essential part of the diet.
Originally posted by DevolutionEvolvd
In the end, what it basically boils down to, in my opinion, is for you to do what you feel is right for you. That's it. There is plenty of information on the subject. Don't afraid to do a little research guys. It won't hurt. I promise.
-Dev
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by lee anoma
Look at murder as a transitive verb on online definitions. Hell, look at your own post. Notice v.tr.2:
To kill brutally or inhumanly.
To kill? Check. Brutally (in the event of factory farms)? Check. Inhumanly(same, factory farms). Check.
If animals are killed in a humane fashion by humans for the purpose of consumption it isn't considered unlawful or murder.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Originally posted by lee anoma
By extension that would make anyone that eats vegetables a murderer unless they can be absolutely positive no animal or insect died during the cultivation and harvest.
So what then do we eat with "clean" hands?
Food you grow yourself comes to mind.
I know it may not be totally realistic in this culture with the way we live today, but, maybe we werent meant to be this disassociated from our food.
We murder one another. We beat children to death. If we cannot get the egocentric human animal to deeply recognize inhumanity to other humans and cease it, what chance do you really have of convincing another that it is cruel to eat a species utterly unlike itself?
Originally posted by DevolutionEvolvd
In the end, what it basically boils down to, in my opinion, is for you to do what you feel is right for you. That's it. There is plenty of information on the subject. Don't afraid to do a little research guys. It won't hurt. I promise.
-Dev
Originally posted by lee anoma
I've always played the middle ground with my meals, not eating too much red meat and primarily sticking to fish, chicken, and vegetables but it appears meat should not be ruled out of our diet entirely or there is a price to pay.
Thoughts?
Yeast extracts are one of the few vegetarian foods which provide good levels of the vitamin.
When the volunteers were retested five years later the medics found those with the lowest levels of vitamin B12 were also the most likely to have brain shrinkage. It confirms earlier research showing a link between brain atrophy and low levels of B12.
Originally posted by scientist
It shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that if you stop eating meat, that you will need to get the vitamins and minerals from another source.
We ate animals true enough, but we didn't mistreat them. We depended on them. We also made sure to plant trees and to respect our environment.
I didn't feel the righteous indignation of the anti-meat crowd until I left home for college and work in the cities up north (DC, Baltimore, NY, Philadelphia) and those arrogant accusations were leveled against me by upper-class peers who wouldn't know sassafras from poison ivy.
My point was that the "meat is murder" crowd that buys vegetables from their preferred stores can also be contributing to the "murder" of animals killed during the cultivation and harvest (which is inevitable) so it's a ridiculously hypocritical accusation to make against omnivores.
I also wanted to point out here that not all omnivores are ignorant of nature or respect of animals and most of the more judgmental elitist vegans and vegetarians I came across in cities haven't lived my lifestyle that was closer to nature than they will ever get.
It's pretty ironic actually.
I don't think your examples are necessarily relative to eating meat, nor do I think an animal that eats another animal is cruel. It occurs in nature and if the human animal does this in a humane fashion it is not murder.
What does genocide have to do with being an omnivore?
Originally posted by lee anoma
So are you saying it IS cruel, but it is a waste of time trying to explain that to meat eaters?
Originally posted by DeadFlagBlues
Originally posted by lee anoma
So, instead of looking at what these "arrogant rich kids" had to say, you simply justified your meat consumption because you actually knew where your food was coming from and all the work it had taken to consume it, and you used that to leverage what you thought was right against their opinions. Correct?
Murder - to kill or slaughter inhumanely or barbarously.
Kill - to deprive of life in any manner; cause the death of; slay.
I think it is right, not to eat meat, as I think you should spare us your justification for doing so.
Where as cows, chickens, pigs, and fish are cultivated to be murdered...
In some way, you can consider it a "genocide" as it is species specific.
It comes down to a decision. Do you believe life is a product that can/should be consumed?
Simple really.