Firstly, to those who don't want "naysayers" to contribute to this thread I say this; most of us are not unshakeable skeptics.
However, before we allow our protective and reasonable doubts to be cast aside, we reserve the right to remain questioners; we have an inherent need
to voice reservations when someone states, in an open forum, that they are the recipient of higher knowledge from a superior species.
It shouldn't be surprising that not all will instantly believe the claims made in this thread. Does everyone simply accept what they're being told
Isn't that exactly what is meant when the old adage: "open your eyes to the truth" is used ad infinitum with regard to disbelieving the
NWO-Illuminati-Reptillians etc? So why shouldn't it apply now?
Why is it so wrong when we question so called alien redeemers?
We have every right to ask of an "authority" (this "Pleiadian woman") why it considers its culture (of which we know nothing about
) to be a
suitable saviour of part of our species. Where is our choice in this matter? Do the "Pleiadians" not condone democracy? We should be worried if they
don't. Most adherents to the "truth" of this subject seem to have ignored why we can't exercise our inalienable right to voice our
We don't seem to have one.
"They" are just going to turn up, select a minute fraction of the population and let the rest burn. Very benevolent. The excuse that it would be
impossible to move every human is an assumtion. How does anyone know the limits of the "Pleiadian" technology? If this is real, how do you know
they are telling the truth about their capabilities?
from Nexroth I don't buy it. If what you say is true, then the behavior of these beings and the way they choose to spread their
message is odd and inefficient for such an advanced race. My guess is that your story isn't true.
Thank goodness I'm not alone. This "message" is
highly inefficient and selective. It sticks closely to information that is already in the
There is nothing new supplied in smokingman2006
Nothing that even remotely suggests he is interacting with a highly developed and complex species. His lack of communication skills would be rendered
a mere hiccup if his "contact" were to explain in simple layman's tersm something extraordinary and innovative for him to relay here.
(Some may now object to my criticising the OP's use of what he says is a foreign language (English), but I counter with this: does the French
language not use punctuation? Would a "security analyst" [spelling corrected] not have those basic skills available to him? If you cannot explain in
your own tongue multifaceted premises, then use an online translator! We'll forgive the glitches it'd throw up simply to have an undiluted
communictaion from an "alien".)
Is this lack of originalty not slightly disconcerting? The message does not change; it does not transform into a culturaly embracing statement that in
its very construction and content convinces all
to the legitimacy of its source.
It's just repetitve.
Are we parrots? Is that how we're supposed to learn?
Do the "Pleidians" know so little of us, that they neglect to acknowledge we are the holders of a fierce and wonderful intelligence? I cannot
conceive of any
et species not knowing this.
And conversely, the message does not become clearer, become easier to disseminate and thus be available to all
. Not everyone is familiar with
the infant concepts of "higher-vibrations" etc. Why exclude them?
Of course, if we are dealing with a literary inability to expand on an original theme, then that would explain why nothing changes...
and as I write that, this gem appears:
tonight after telling my wife about my encounter she left me
I was sitting on my terrace drinking vodka with my trusty cats when around midinght my alien friend returned
she showed me and exact grave of alexander the great and told me moses was nothing but a thief who stole the secrets of the pharohs and used it to
help his people better themself
she also explain the use of monatomic mana to help the brain develope into a super state
Classic. Throw a few historical celebrities into the mix, along with a bit of Sitchin, and maybe that'll supply the neccesary solemnity and gravitas
this thread is sorely missing.
she also said that according to most races humen are not worth saving
Six and a half billion people would disagree strongly with that. Did smokingman2006
not object to this? I damn well would have.
I also understand about the 5 dragon who came here 20,000 years ago and there true intent on our future also known as the reptiles
And the audience go wild with the coup de grace of the mention of Reptillians!
Nothing is convincing me that this thread isn't a hoax. I do not object in the slightest to it including a message of love and salvation, etc. In
these troubled times, we all need compassion and understanding.
But the garbled and poorly thought out information purportedly given to smokingman2006
does not, in any way shape or form, suggest it has a
real provenance, other than in his head (and I don't mean in a metaphysical way).
Perhaps Ms "Pleiades" needs to rethink her envoy, as her choice has resulted in him being riddled with holes.