posted on Sep, 21 2008 @ 12:37 AM
I very much believe the OPs experience is geniune. First, unlike riggs, I am an experiencer myself, though not with the same people. But I value the
testimonies of others far more than those who pour their heart and soul into proving or debunking photos, because I'm not interested in the proof
factor, far beyond that. The agenda issue is of the greatest concern.
Though many think greys behave poorly, I have no actual bad feelings for the ones we've been forced to meet. They seemed to be connected at one
point with humans, but now are not. (I can't speak for every groups of greys). And though their ways are less understood, and they are less
understood, I understand the work the ones that deal with us are similar to the ones that deal with Jim Sparks.
Ufology exists due to the experiences real people, and often ordinary people, have been having for years. This is the heart and soul of ufology. Its
the grass roots experience in its most basic level. So anyone that comes forward will be examined carefully by me. Its a core need of mine to see
what is occurring with regards to our visitors, and to examine why we aren't getting the kind of practical help we need.
The OP has the markings of real contact. These are steadily shown throughout his account.
First theres no sign that he is mental, or delusional. He is intelligent and well written and natural in his responses. He shows stress, and mental
adjustment to his new messages that he has to sort out and get grounded again after having experienced. Unless he is working on behalf of the
misinformatin campaign, ie. he's black op, then I have to conclude this is real. Also, if he were the latter, his frailties, and nervous exhaustion
after each encounter where he has to get his grounding, isn't the way the misinfo agents operate. They don't use these techniques.
Once I have satisfied he's telling the truth, I really look at what this unusual person is saying. She would never have come down and chosen to
contact him face to face in these sessions if it wasn't urgent. This doesn't mean I automatically trust everything any et says, as I've read too
many accounts that make me cautious this way. But either way, whether the disaster is real, or they're really trying to push us into changing our
ways to gain more support from those who think Jack the Ripper represents our planet doesn't matter.
Others are free to feel otherwise, but they should not be harrassing in their attacks, nor persist in such obvious thread derailment techniques. I
don't feel such behavior is skeptical. My father is skeptical, but not overbearing or rude. This behavior seems like an agenda. Could also be
working for someone?
Edit to add: note I'm saying that in order for the contact, the situation is serious for our planet (which I think many of us know) whether the
exact disaster she talks about is imminent or not. Our actions in the next few years may determine whether we will receive the help we need, or
whether life on our planet is extinguished by any number of things, including nuclear, or enslaved.
[edit on 21-9-2008 by mystiq]