You didn't critique anything. You implied the poster was in a "special room", so to speak. That's not critique. That was making fun.
I believe ATS supports the idea that people can come here and relate personal experiences without the endless barage of attacks they expect from the outside. It's one of the reasons we are here and you completely make it just as hard when you mock an OP for his statement.
It's not up to us to judge how real or phoney a personal experience is. It's just that. A personal experience. If you have no imput that can support the OP (like others have done), why make yourself heard.
Post with class and you will be taken as classy.
Originally posted by peacejet
All I wanted to say was visions are purely imaginary and we can beleive only when the person has REAL VISUAL sighting.![]()
What's this "we" crap? You have a mouse in your pocket? Visions are Personal Experiences that cannot be verified by some schlep on a website. Think about what you just said. "Visions are imaginary. You said that right before you stated "We can believe only when a person has REAL VISUAL sighting"
You totally contradict yourself. You are the self-proclaimed expert now. What's the difference between what YOU think is imaginary and what is real?
Like I said, guys. You can assess a personal experience and judge it as real or imaginary all you like. But, to post on ATS a belittling and mocking post distracts the OP from relating what may just be the convincing information. It's retardant to the ends.
Cuhail



