It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yellowcard
How about some questions like "how could something that big be covered up, since it's the most watched event in human history"
or "how could someone wire a building with explosives without anyone noticing it"
or acknowledging that the towers began to lean after they were hit,
the collapse looked nothing like a demolition
as any demolition expert would tell you,
or how could thousands of scientists and eye witness reports be over turned by interviews taken out of context,
or eye witnesses victims of mass hysteria.
That's what's so hysterical about the 9/11 truth movement,
it only asks questions that it wants to ask, and ignores the rest.
At least the "official story" has answered 99.9% of all concerns with scientific analysis instead of assumptions based on video edits and unclassified documents that too are taken out of context.
I could make something up completely and it could be eaten up by the masses, just like so many hoax claims are...
The cover up of 9/11 is...hold on everybody...that the government failed, just like it did with Katrina, I don't see any investigations into that, and just like with Katrina the government tried to cover up it's failures with information dodging.
Originally posted by yellowcard
How about some questions like "how could something that big be covered up, since it's the most watched event in human history" or "how could someone wire a building with explosives without anyone noticing it" or acknowledging that the towers began to lean after they were hit, the collapse looked nothing like a demolition as any demolition expert would tell you, or how could thousands of scientists and eye witness reports be over turned by interviews taken out of context, or eye witnesses victims of mass hysteria. That's what's so hysterical about the 9/11 truth movement, it only asks questions that it wants to ask, and ignores the rest. At least the "official story" has answered 99.9% of all concerns with scientific analysis instead of assumptions based on video edits and unclassified documents that too are taken out of context. I could make something up completely and it could be eaten up by the masses, just like so many hoax claims are...
Originally posted by jfj123
Interesting interview although jesse takes the easy stance of the typical "truther" in that he simply asks questions but has no answers. Don't get me wrong, questions are good but without the answers, they're not very helpful.
He's in a position where he could use his connections to get answers that many regular citizens cannot however, he doesn't seem that interested in doing so. Seems a bit odd??? Or is it that it's easier to ask the questions then look for the answers???
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by yellowcard
or "how could someone wire a building with explosives without anyone noticing it"
Get rid of the dogs (cage them or remove them - that did happen, you know), dress up as "delivery persons" with boxes of "computers," "microwave ovens," whatever, that are filled with what is needed, or "maintenance" personnel... Work at night, work on unused floors (there was sound, dust and other things noticed from empty floors...). Easy as pie.
the collapse looked nothing like a demolition
Um... Yes, it did. I have watched MANY - living in Las Vegas when a number of buildings came down.
as any demolition expert would tell you,
ANY? That's a laugh. I have heard a number of them say it looked exactly like demolition. Maybe the ones you have heard were those piad "experts..."
At least the "official story" has answered 99.9% of all concerns with scientific analysis instead of assumptions based on video edits and unclassified documents that too are taken out of context.
Paid "experts?" There are many, many independent analyses that dispute what the Official "experts" say. Why should we believe the Official ones?
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by yellowcard
or "how could someone wire a building with explosives without anyone noticing it"
Get rid of the dogs (cage them or remove them - that did happen, you know), dress up as "delivery persons" with boxes of "computers," "microwave ovens," whatever, that are filled with what is needed, or "maintenance" personnel... Work at night, work on unused floors (there was sound, dust and other things noticed from empty floors...). Easy as pie.
Yep sounds easy until you figure that the entire building would need to be wired by a large team of demo experts and this would include direct wiring to the support posts and beams. In other words, the building would need to be gutted. Not so easy as pie now
Originally posted by yellowcard
Originally posted by jfj123
Interesting interview although jesse takes the easy stance of the typical "truther" in that he simply asks questions but has no answers. Don't get me wrong, questions are good but without the answers, they're not very helpful.
He's in a position where he could use his connections to get answers that many regular citizens cannot however, he doesn't seem that interested in doing so. Seems a bit odd??? Or is it that it's easier to ask the questions then look for the answers???
Originally posted by Ex_MislTech
Originally posted by jfj123
Interesting interview although jesse takes the easy stance of the typical "truther" in that he simply asks questions but has no answers. Don't get me wrong, questions are good but without the answers, they're not very helpful.
He's in a position where he could use his connections to get answers that many regular citizens cannot however, he doesn't seem that interested in doing so. Seems a bit odd??? Or is it that it's easier to ask the questions then look for the answers???
Take the time to watch 911 revisited, all the emergency workers
and engineers that spoke out against obvious flaws in the official
story.
Take the time to watch 911 press for truth.
After watching those two if you don't think there is at least something
odd going on, then I do not think anyone is going to be able
to convince you otherwise.
They are worth your time, and they are 100% verifiable as far as
I can see from the items I have looked up in both.
The firefighters that were in the building when the bombs went
off down stairs are particularly convincing to me.
Why would a firefighter risk losing his job by telling a lie ?
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by SarielDCLXVI
Obviously you have no idea what is involved in gutting a building and how much debris would need to be hauled away without one person seeing anything. No it's not possible to completely gut a building that's being used without people seeing the demo, the charge installation and then the remodeling.
But then again, maybe the starship enterprise simply beamed the material in and out, which is just as reasonable of a hypothesis.
Originally posted by jfj123
That being said, there's no evidence to support they planned and executed 9/11. If there were, I would not only be on the band wagon, but driving it !!!
Originally posted by SarielDCLXVI
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by SarielDCLXVI
Obviously you have no idea what is involved in gutting a building and how much debris would need to be hauled away without one person seeing anything. No it's not possible to completely gut a building that's being used without people seeing the demo, the charge installation and then the remodeling.
But then again, maybe the starship enterprise simply beamed the material in and out, which is just as reasonable of a hypothesis.
Really?
Care to back up the claim that demolition equipment could not have been applied to this building. I do not meant this "duh they have to rip all the walls down and everyone would see that, stupid" stuff. Show me exactly what would have been involved in rigging those buildings. I want exact designs, means and methods of what would have been involved in rigging the buildings for demolition.
Then after that, tell me you know for sure that never happend.
Apparently you missed my actual question, and anyone of you FOX robots can answer, anyone at all. ANYONE THAT WAS WATCHING EVERYONE IN THOSE BUILDINGS 24 HRS A DAY EVERY DAY PLEASE LEAP UP AND SPEAK!!!!!!!!!!!
Otherwise, you are not going to prove anything to me about whether or not it could have been pulled off. But get back to me when you have figured out how to rig the buildings exactly.
Originally posted by SarielDCLXVI
Originally posted by jfj123
That being said, there's no evidence to support they planned and executed 9/11. If there were, I would not only be on the band wagon, but driving it !!!
There is plenty of evidence to tell you that they were well aware of it in advance, what does that tell you?
Originally posted by SarielDCLXVI
reply to post by jfj123
So, knowing an attack would take place and then doing everything they could to help confuse the issue with training missions and taking away any would be rescue or interception, is incompetence and not complicity?