"70% of Americans support a ban on semi-automatic weapons", page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 19-9-2008 @ 02:19 AM by projectvxn
reply to post by dave420



Dave your username is very telling...So I will ask you to stop being lazy for just one moment of your day and read the Constitution. It is not Dogma. Dogma is the mess we have today...Telling everyone we are at the top of our game when we have sunk nearly to the bottom of the sea. I want to be able to have auto-assault rifles, I want to be able to carry any weapon I wish without being harassed by the gestapo, I mean cops, over it. Because I want this country to be able to fight any threat foreign and domestic. I want the government to be AFRAID of ever thinking about curtailing our rights, and I want any foreign enemy to realize that invading America would be an exercise in futility.

I don't want to have to rely on my government for nothing. Especially not protection. I can do that myself. If having government protecting me from terrorists, or Russians, or Flying Spaghetti Monsters means taking away my rights, then I will take my chances with terrorists, Russians, and Flying Spaghetti Monsters before I give up one drop of Liberty.

[edit on 19-9-2008 by projectvxn]


reply posted on 20-9-2008 @ 03:33 PM by roguetechie
lol the great part is people stating we need close air support... In the event of a nationwide rebellion the military wouldn't have CAS in most areas... and beyond that there are thousands of cessna's pipers and aerobatic planes, and thousands of people who know how to make rockets who says the rebels won't have CAS? Look up the technical war, tamil tigers, and some of the other brushfire conflicts online. You'll see that CAS can be built in OVERWHELMING numbers on a budget if you have people with the technical expertise to carry it out. Your only concern then becomes avgas ... oh wait! thousands of regional and private airstrips nationwide? the 82nd and the rangers can only secure so many of them.
Beyond that the US military's airframe count and maintenance requirements would give them very limited cover. This isn't even covering the psychological impact on pilots sortying as fast as they can rearm and fuel that are having to kill their countrymen.

On to the next point the vaunted artillery,

1. err anyone who thinks the lower ranks of the military is solidly behind the regime at this point doesn't know anyone in the military. Blackwater and their ilk on the other hand... that's another story.

2. the US military has THOUSANDS of artillery pieces sitting in basically undefendable depots around the US. You think no one would think to pull a smash and grab?

3. the minute an MLRS or 155 with toe poppers loaded fires on the citizenry and the crew sees it's results you'll have basically neutrallized the arty by default because the crews won't want to fire.

I'm not saying that armed revolt wouldn't be without Massive casualties and a factionallization the US probably would never recover from, but the question that needs to be asked is "Is what we have that good?" In the land of the free there certainly are alot of laws governing that freedom. And there is a basic stricture our founding fathers let us know they believed in strongly "people should not fear their governments, governments should fear their people." Personally I think it's time to remind some people of that.

Now beyond that... the second ammendment is NOT anachronistic nor is private gun ownership a cause of a significant portion of "violent crime" look up what all is included in violent crime numbers sometime... Then do some thinking and talk to a brit and ask them if when a fight breaks out everyone even peripherally involved goes to jail. People in power have very sophisticated techniques to make the US look like the wild west but honestly it really isn't.



[edit on 20-9-2008 by roguetechie]


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 12:52 AM by ANNED
www.abovetopsecret.com...
this is the thread on propaganda.

then you will understand "70% of Americans support a ban on semi-automatic weapons"

pure propaganda by the anti gun movenment.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 09:26 AM by bdswetty
reply to post by DarkStormCrow



This is rediculous. what needs to be done is a crack down on the manufacturers who produce cheap guns made for personal confrontations.

Bryco Arms and their fed dubbed "ring of fire". The cheapest, worst guns out there that you can buy for 60 bucks new. These are the throw away guns. The ones people use for confrontations and then throw it away.

Unfortunately, the poor need to be armed, too.. and with decent guns costing a minimum of 300 it's rough.

Banning semi-auto guns completely is completely out of line.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 09:31 AM by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by bdswetty



So what is it when some thug idiot chucks a nice 1911 or Glock 17 in a sewer grate? Those arent cheap. The problem with the "cheap guns are used by criminals" idea is that it assume criminals are just walking into any old gun shop to buy their firearms.

How to you decide what's a 'cheap' gun when the criminals are buying from their buddies trunk?

I dont buy the "Saturday Night Special" theory at all. It's just more propaganda to puch the anti-gun movement forward.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nano Drones Flying in Formation
  Posted 9 days ago with 15 member flags
FPS RUSSIA
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags
Spinel Thin Transparent Ceramic Armor defeats Barrett .50 Cal BMG
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
Self-steering Bullet Researched
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
Shockrounds take out three of your five senses.
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
Defective Ammunition Warning
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags