It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
The skeptics will find 200 + reasons to still claim Jesus Christ didn't exist.
What are you talking about? This is the kind of substantial evidence the skeptics want that shows that Jesus as a man may have existed. All christians have done is provide second-hand accounts of Jesus which are not credible or reliable. Finally, there is something we can debate on.
None of you doubt the existence of Alexander the Great even though nothing was written about him until 400 years after his death.
No one seems to care that his "proof" is from second hand sources.
Oh, I get it.. it's because he never claimed to be a God.
Oh, wait, he did claim to be a God.
Originally posted by reject
A "head stone", found near the entrance to the first century catacomb, is inscribed with the sign of the cross.
"From its simplicity of form, the cross has been used both as a religious symbol and as an ornament, from the dawn of man's civilization. Various objects, dating from periods long anterior to the Christian era, have been found, marked with crosses of different designs, in almost every part of the old world." The cross symbol was found in:
- Scandinavia - The Tau cross symbolized the hammer of the God Thor
- Babylon - the cross with a crescent moon was the symbol of their moon deity
- Assyria - the corners of the cross represented the four directions in which the sun shines.
- India - In Hinduism, the vertical shaft represents the higher, celestial states of being; the horizontal bar represents the lower, earthly states.
- Egypt - The ankh cross (a Tau cross topped by an inverted tear shape) is associated with Maat, their Goddess of Truth. It also represents the sexual union of Isis and Osiris
- Europe - The use of a human effigy on a cross in the form of a scarecrow has been used from ancient times. In prehistoric times, a human would be sacrificed and hung on a cross. The sacrifice would later be chopped to pieces; his blood and pieces of flesh were widely distributed and buried to encourage the crop fertility.
Your point being?
Originally posted by banyan
crosses have been used long before christianity pawned that symbolism as their own. what part of christianity really wasn't borrowed from the ancient religions or pagan traditions?
Let me thank you for bringing up that matter as I'd like to once & for all put it to rest.
Matthew 13:24-30
Another parable set he before them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man that sowed good seed in his field: (25) but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares also among the wheat, and went away. (26) But when the blade sprang up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also. (27) And the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst thou not sow good seed in thy field? whence then hath it tares? (28) And he said unto them, An enemy hath done this. And the servants say unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up? (29) But he saith, Nay; lest haply while ye gather up the tares, ye root up the wheat with them. (30) Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of the harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather up first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
Originally posted by banyan
reply to post by reject
i did not think i would have to spell my previous post out, but i will since you deemed it a deterrent from your OP.
... my post was merely meant to illustrate that a cross found on a tomb does not conclusively mean christianity was the only possible explanation or meaning, especially since crosses were widely used before jesus was ever supposedly born...
if christianity was the only religion that ever used that symbol in history, you would have a case for the cross, but since you have various older traditions using it, you cannot claim exclusive explanatory proof.
Originally posted by reject
reply to post by banyan
good grief...the cross plus yeshua plus the date plus the location
You're still not sure its a christian site? yeah, right
hey, no fair, you left out "helper/redeemer." I edited my post
Originally posted by banyan
common name + common symbol + common date [to any of the millions of people who were living in that time] + needing to be buried somewhere = jesus lord almighty of pure and holy goodness?
maybe? maybe not? i do not think this is enough for me to wager an eternal soul on.
Originally posted by reject
ok, banyan & deaf alien. Let me put it this way. There is no archaeologist or historian in their right minds who would say that there is even the remotest possibility the site isn't christian
Originally posted by drevill
reply to post by reject
thanks for posting this, im going to have a good look. Another notch in the evidence that people will choose to ignor
Who's grasping at straws here? If that were the case it would've been on display to the public which it was not. Its the real deal.
Originally posted by banyan
...it could be a fake burial site planted by early christians for the ensnarement of future generations to believe in their newly founded religion...
this whole thread reeks of needless conjecture to prove that one's whole life is based on truth and not centuries of lies
No, deaf alien, I only proved that Jesus Christ of Nazareth walked the earth during the 1st century. It takes faith to believe what he taught as those who used this tomb did.
The ossuaries (stone coffins), untouched for 2,000 years, as they were found by archaeologist P. Bagatti on the Mt. of Olives
Originally posted by reject
Who's grasping at straws here?
Originally posted by banyan
...it could be a fake burial site planted by early christians for the ensnarement of future generations to believe in their newly founded religion...
this whole thread reeks of needless conjecture to prove that one's whole life is based on truth and not centuries of lies
Originally posted by reject
Originally posted by banyan
No, deaf alien, I only proved that Jesus Christ of Nazareth walked the earth during the 1st century.
It takes faith to believe what he taught as those who used this tomb did.