Originally posted by ANoNyMiKE
Of course she believes that just as much as Bush does and always have. She makes no excuse for her blatant pursuit of establishing a theocracy, one law and one war at a time.
Originally posted by Bunch
reply to post by LLoyd45
For a person to be at a loss for words it sont neccessarly need to be stumbling or making long pauses. A person that is at loss for words would also use deflection and spin in order to skew the relevant topic, she did it TWICE but Gibson didnt let her of the hook, when ask for a third time the she gave the answer: "I dont know"
[edit on 11-9-2008 by Bunch]
Originally posted by tommy_boy
Buddy, it was a BAD interview for her. Watch it again. Gibson schooled her. She flinched on the "Bush Doctrine" question. She did not come off presidential, and she needed to.