posted on Sep, 13 2008 @ 04:14 PM
reply to post by Badge01
That would be the same concept as trying to build a plane while ignoring all documentation regarding mechanics of flight and aero design.
Much research has been done on the B&B Hill case to include re-tracing their route with a watch. Why re do what has been done? Research does not
necessarily mean doing the whole thing from scratch, especially when you can stand on the shoulders of work done, and continue.
re·search [ r sùrch ]
noun
Definition:
organized study: methodical investigation into a subject in order to discover facts, to establish or revise a theory, or to develop a plan of action
based on the facts discovered.
For the sake of argument here is a list of website with information and research pertaining to the hill abduction. (I have left out the obvious ones
from sites such as ufocasebook, weird-encyclopedia, and the like to attempt to bring a more non-biased base.)
www.seacoastnh.com...
www.reference.com...
www.concordmonitor.com.../20060919/REPOSITORY/309190001
www.kidzworld.com...
www.newsvine.com...
www.prlog.org...
mcadams.posc.mu.edu...
www.seancasteel.com...
My point here is, there is no need (short of not believing anyone) to do all the research from scratch. These are all misc. site discussing the Hill
abduction. If you were to actually look at the "ufo websites", you would easily find that much of that work your stating needs to be done, has been.