It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Spock Shock
Lmao as if, no I live in northwestern ontario canada, we see lots of stuff like that on days where theres a clear sky, i think its just the way lights refracted through droplets of moisture in the air or something, not sure, definitly not cern tho, lmao
Originally posted by eaglewingz
CERN?? What a ridiculous idea!
Everybody knows that all unusual looking atmospheric phenomena are caused by HAARP
Originally posted by citizen smith
More and more i'm beginning to wonder if the acronym CERN doesn't actually stand for Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire but Christians Everywhere Reacting Nonsensically
Originally posted by Blaine91555
You must be kidding; right???? Should we also prove that a Skunks glands secreting a bad smell was not caused by CERN?
Originally posted by Blaine91555
You do know that the test everyone seems to be afraid of has not even taken place yet?
Originally posted by asen_y2k
Yes i know this phenomenon is common in Alaska and other places, but it is safe to say it has NEVER occured in India or rather so few that its not in anyones memory. So why all of a sudden here? Thats the question which is causing speculations. I think this thread should be on climate change rather than CERN...
Originally posted by BlasteR
I still live in Alaska and we see those ALLL the time. Especially in the winter. But we usually call them sun dogs here.. Not "solar halo".. When the creation of the "halo" isn't caused by the sun at all but high altitude ice crystals..
-ChriS
Originally posted by saint4God
Being that you were the one to claim "bogus" and requested it closed, it would have been nice to have at least an explanation as to why. I'm also surprised that someone with such keen interest and knowledge in the field is uninterested in sharing...on a forum...where people discuss in great detail.
Originally posted by dave420
No, that's not how science works.
Originally posted by dave420
There is no evidence to suggest the LHC has any environmental effects, especially in India.
Originally posted by dave420
Scientists shouldn't have to waste their time and energy righting people's ridiculous assertions.
Originally posted by dave420
No - those who are saying the LHC is having an effect on, say Indian skies, have to cough up the evidence. Not the other way round.
Originally posted by dave420And yes, it is rather surprising that you are being paid if that is how you think science works.
Originally posted by saint4God
Discounting possibilites without explanation is not scientific, no matter how you slice it.
Originally posted by Man_Versus_AntiMan
Erm no... considering possibilities without evidence is not scientific.
Originally posted by Man_Versus_AntiMan
Its speculation.
Originally posted by Man_Versus_AntiMan
Well i agree with that up to the point where it becomes a veiled way of saying 'its valid until proved wrong',
Originally posted by Man_Versus_AntiMan
because of course speculative theories are only validated when proved right. If indeed they can be.