When investigating a subject, it is important to ask the same questions over and over again. If the subject is lying their answers will change. This has happened over and over again with 9/11.

At first the administration called UBL the Mastermind behind the attacks. Latter on the administration claimed that the attacks were a co authored plot between UBL and Saddam Husein, lately the Administration has changed it's story yet again to make KSM the focus of the plot.

What I am wondering is why police detectives all around the country don't jump up unanimously and cry fowl?

At this point more and more people around the country have stopped believing the official story behind the 9/11 attacks. I once had a conversation with a former police investigator, he was shocked to learn about building 7. Having lived in NY and doing police work there, he was familiar with the WTC complex and Building 7 yet he thought that it was torn down with the rest of the complex after the attacks were over, he was shocked to realise that it had fell into itself on the day of 9/11.

The point of my argument is this. A criminal cannot keep a straight story. Someone who is telling the truth won't change their story. They don't have to, they are telling the truth. If your lying you can't keep the same lie going, cracks will appear in your story and you will change your story in order to cover those cracks.

This is what we are seeing in the case of 9/11

I encourage everyone to take the time to read the 9/11 commission report, all the official reports that are publicly available, and see how over time the official story has changed over and over again. This isn't rocket science this is simple investigative query. When a criminal cannot keep the same story going. Then you know the criminal is lying. They wouldn't have to change the story over and over again if they were telling the truth.

Whatever the real facts are to the case of 9/11 they are slowly being eroded over time through the grace of revisionist history. Fortunately for us nearly immediately after the attacks, people cried fowl and started collecting all the video and photographic evidence they could. What is interesting is that as far as I know no one has taken a hard look at the original blueprints for the twin towers.

But no, we ignore the fact that the majority of the supposed hijackers were actually from Saudi Arabia, not Afghanistan, we ignore the fact that UBL used to be in the employ of the CIA, we ignore the facts. We just argue over semantics and speculation because the speculation weakens our investigation.

[edit on 9/11/2008 by whatukno]

If anyone has taken a serious look into this entire situation, after much research it is plain to see that this was the idea of yousef and KSM and this is fact, they know that .

Sigh.....
The truth is out there for everyone to see....
If anyone still has doubts about what went on,then they are truly blind.
The fact that some people say "saddam did it"makes me sick to my stomach...

The fact that people will continue to believe what CNN,FOX and any other news outlet has to say,makes me lose faith in humanity nothing less.

I hope everyday from the bottom of my heart that the "unthinking majority" will wake up,alas alas...they don't.

Spike

[edit on 11-9-2008 by Spike Spiegle]

I can't believe the White House has once again, changed the official story. But the people have followed along, believing whatever they've said, why should they stop now?

This is incredible to the point of being almost funny. Almost.

I have never believed the official story, so this isn't really a shock. I just can't believe the gall!

hahahahahahahaha [etc.]

Now that I got that off my chest... could it be that they saw Morgan Spurlock's latest film and decided "it's just not worth it?".

There was a time when I thought government was impertive. Then I came to the conclusion it was a necessity in certain areas. These days I think it's becoming a liability. These modern day lunatics are going to turn me into an anarchist yet...

---

Mod Edit: Character edit for page distortion - Jak

[edit on 11/9/08 by JAK]

Don't believe what the White House is saying!! Osama Bin Laden is indeed the mastermind. Khalid Sheik Mohammed was the scapegoat. The White House doesn't want Osama Bin Laden hurt by any American vigilantes. So if you say that Osama was not the mastermind but Sheik Mohammed who is already caught, then nobody needs to go after Osama Bin Laden, and he is safe. But I believe Osama did it since he ordered it.

Originally posted by deltaboy
Don't believe what the White House is saying!! Osama Bin Laden is indeed the mastermind. Khalid Sheik Mohammed was the scapegoat. The White House doesn't want Osama Bin Laden hurt by any American vigilantes. So if you say that Osama was not the mastermind but Sheik Mohammed who is already caught, then nobody needs to go after Osama Bin Laden, and he is safe. But I believe Osama did it since he ordered it.

So let me get this straight, we shouldn't believe them about this part of 9/11, but every other part about 9/11 they want us to believe is the gods honest truth.

Absolute Horse Poo!
I am so unbelievably pissed off right now.
They honor the souls that died by trying to ONCE AGAIN spin and distort history to better suit their story.
The saddest freaking (I would like to use the other F word but...) thing about this is that my fellow American's will swallow it like a spoon full of sugar.
I WILL NEVER FORGET THE VICTIMS OF 9/11 AND I WILL NEVER FORGET HEARING OVER AND OVER AND OVER "OSAMA BIN LADIN IS THE MASTERMIND"
Screw you Bush Administration, you all disgust me.

Originally posted by burdman30ott6
Semantics, folks. She clearly identified bin Laden's role in the briefing and it had not changed from the role they've pegged on him since day one. Bin Laden was the one who setup the plan required to carry out the plot and gave the ultimate orders, KSM was the one who actually masterminded the plot itself. You're arguing over nothing more than a semantical difference between Dana Pierino & Tony Snow. FOX News (and virtually every other news organization) used the term "mastermind" to describe bin Laden because it is a far quicker, more provocative title than "Al Qaida leader who gave the final orders to carry out mastermind KSM's plot." Tony Snow was FOX's #1 man so obviously he brought alot of the same semantics to the position at the White House that he had used on a daily basis on air at FOX.

It's the same thing if Keith Olbermann ever takes a position as press secretary for the Democrats and refers to Karl Rove as "Turd Blossom" while the next guy in simply calls him Karl Rove. My God, if this isn't running very close to the "it depends on what the definition of is, is" nonsense.

Quoted for truth. Its not that hard to figure out. Everyone OBL is the head of AQ and we knew it was AQ. It was not until we captured a few top AQ terrorist that we learned that it was not the brainchild of OBL but KSM.

Besides KSM killed OBL after he would not give a green light for the hit on 9/11. OBL came out right after 9/11 with an audio message saying that he did not order the attack but then said he understood why it was done. OBL was killed at Torah Bora for one not ordering the 9/11 attack but then some say intentionally leading U.S. forces to his location.

Remember how all the Arabs stopped fighting for a day during the raid on Torah Bora? Thats when they announced OBL was dead. Or he is just hanging out with Putin, Who really knows?