Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, the man who said that subprime was contained and that the Bazooka in his pocket would never be used, now assures us
that the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be costless to taxpayers. Despite the near euphoria that the plan has sparked on Wall Street, the
move will go down in history as the biggest policy blunder of all time, and will be credited as a pivotal point in the financial collapse of the
American economy. The ultimate cost to Unites States citizens will be in the range of hundreds of billions of dollars, perhaps more.
The original idea that gave birth to Freddie and Fannie, which is to make housing more affordable to average Americans, should now be seen as
farcical. Their new goal is to keep housing prices high. Absent Freddie and Fannie, housing prices would fall sharply and the mortgage market would
stabilize. Americans would once again be able to buy affordable houses with mortgages they could actually repay –just like their grandparents did.
Instead they will keep overpaying for houses, burdening themselves with excessive payments in the process, and ultimately sticking taxpayers with the
bills when they default.
In contrast to Paulson’s continuous misreading of the market, I have consistently predicted the failure of Freddie and Fannie. I did so in my book
Crash Proof, and in numerous speeches, commentaries and television appearances. I also was quick to point out that Paulson’s Bazooka would not
remain holstered for long.
There is absolutely no substance to Paulson’s insistence that based on the government’s first claim on the future profits of Fannie and Freddie,
the plan offers protection for taxpayers. There will be no future profits, just more heavy losses. Americans will now have unlimited ability to
continue to overpay for houses and commit to mortgages they can’t afford. In fact, the plan insures that eventual public sector losses will vastly
exceed those that would have befallen the private sector in a free-market resolution.
Paulson claims that his goal is to stabilize the mortgage market. But the best way to do so would be to allow housing prices to fall to a market
clearing level. As long as home prices remain artificially high, the risks of mortgage lending will keep credit tight, and the high costs of mortgage
payments will keep potential buyers on the side-lines. With private lenders justly cautious, the government intends to hold open the lending spigots,
without the pesky concerns over losses or financial risk. The hope is that the new lending will prevent home prices from falling further. It won’t
work. The government “solution” will simply delay the fall of artificially high home valuations and temporarily preserve the illusion of
In order to preserve current home prices, the government will be forced to maintain the lax lending standards that got us into this mess in the first
place. Since all the losses will now be borne by taxpayers, those lax standards will be much more problematic. The moral hazard that existed prior to
this bailout has become that much more hazardous. Every mortgage now insured by Fannie and Freddie is the equivalent of a U.S. Treasury bond. This
allows anyone to borrow on the full faith and credit of the U.S. government so long has the money is used to buy a house. In addition, mortgage
lending will now be a government function, run with Post Office-like efficiency.
Of course the biggest collateral damage caused by Paulson’s bazooka is the large hole ripped through the already tattered U.S. Constitution. If the
government can do this, does anyone believe there is anything it can not do? In effect the Federal government now has absolute power to corrupt
For a more in depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar denominated
investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.”
Im going to start posting this guys work. He is a genius and like Ron Paul has seen this coming for years. His name is Peter Schiff who was to be
RPs treasury secretary. But hey who needs people in office who knows what they are talking about.